Comment

Representation ID: 12444

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Carden Group

I&O_12961
We support Option A as the preferred framework for setting the strategic objectives of the new Local Plan. While Option B (Sustainability Appraisal objectives) plays an important role in testing the sustainability of policies, it is not suitable as the primary structure for the Local Plan’s strategic objectives.
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 13127

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Network Rail

I&O_13646
Local Plan OB 1 (Objectives) notes the following two alternative options for the new Local Plan: • Option A – Take forward the current Local Plan objectives; or • Option B – Use the Sustainability Appraisal objectives. In relation to Option A, Local Plan objective SO4 notes the importance of reliable and efficient transport networks that support growth and accessibility to jobs. Local Plan objective S05 goes on to require that all development should be supported by or contribute towards improvements in infrastructure. With regards to Option B, criterion 22 from the Sustainability Appraisal is of most direct relevance to transport networks and railway infrastructure. This requires that development makes the best use of existing transport infrastructure and ensure everyone has access to high quality and affordable public transport, cycling and walking infrastructure. Draft Policy SD 1 sets out the various sustainable development elements that new development must provide for in relation to mitigating climate change, adapting to climate change and additional environmental and social requirements. Under the heading of mitigating climate change, criterion 3 requires that new development must, where relevant: “Be designed to make walking, wheeling and cycling as safe and easy as possible. Providing for sustainable transport choices to create healthy and inclusive communities, whilst reducing the need to travel. Incorporating electric vehicle (EV) charging points in every new home with off-street parking, and outside new commercial developments, village halls, community facilities and services.” Network Rail supports the above Strategic Objectives (SO4, SO5, and 22) and Policy SD1 but also requests that specific recognition is given in these to the importance of the railway transport system as part of sustainable growth, including the provision of necessary improvements through private sector investment alongside investment by bodies such as Network Rail. There will be circumstances where transport infrastructure requires enhancements, improvements, and new additions to support sustainable growth.

Comment

Representation ID: 13330

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Landowner (Manor Park)

Agent: Carden Group

I&O_13849
We support Option A as the preferred framework for setting the strategic objectives of the new Local Plan. While Option B (Sustainability Appraisal objectives) plays an important role in testing the sustainability of policies, it is not suitable as the primary structure for the Local Plan’s strategic objectives.
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 13382

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Trust

I&O_13901
The most appropriate option is Option A - take forward current Local Plan objectives.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 13412

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Harworth Group

Agent: Turley

I&O_13931
Harworth considers that whilst the Council may take inspiration from the objectives of the current Local Plan and the Sustainability Appraisal. However, objectives need to be specific to the emerging Local Plan and based on responding positively to national planning policy to grapple with the housing crisis and fostering economic grow and reflective of up-to-date evidence to respond to the specific issues and challenges facing CWAC. This will ensure that the emerging Local Plan objectives support the realisation of the vision. Harworth would seek some further evidence around the approach to the Options once further developed.

Comment

Representation ID: 13600

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Jack Hardman

I&O_14119

Neither of these

Comment

Representation ID: 13614

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_14133
I choose option B
Option B - use the Sustainability Appraisal objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 13740

Received: 31/08/2025

Respondent: Anne Tunnicliffe

I&O_14260

Option B - use the Sustainability Appraisal objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 13856

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Christopher Martin

I&O_14376
It should be a combination of Option A taking forward Local Plan objectives and Option B incorporating appropriate sustainability appraisal objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 13911

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Canal & River Trust

I&O_14431
OBJECTIVES Question OB 1 Objectives With regard to the two alternatives for objectives for the new Local Plan, the Trust has no preference which Option is carried forward. Option A clearly outlines how policies within the Local Plan will be delivered through the principles of Sustainable Development (economic, social and environmental).

Comment

Representation ID: 13949

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Landowner (Forest Road)

Agent: Carden Group

I&O_14469
We support Option A as the preferred framework for setting the strategic objectives of the new Local Plan. While Option B (Sustainability Appraisal objectives) plays an important role in testing the sustainability of policies, it is not suitable as the primary structure for the Local Plan’s strategic objectives.
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 14023

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Landowner (Cogshall Lane)

Agent: Carden Group

I&O_14560
We support Option A as the preferred framework for setting the strategic objectives of the new Local Plan. While Option B (Sustainability Appraisal objectives) plays an important role in testing the sustainability of policies, it is not suitable as the primary structure for the Local Plan’s strategic objectives.
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 14059

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Caroline Hall

I&O_14602
I believe option A - carrying forward and updating the current Local Plan objectives is the right way forward and therefore spatial strategy option B should be maintained.
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 14132

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Crew

I&O_14676
The objectives in Option B are desirable but why should Options A and B be mutually exclusive?  Many of these objectives are very generalised.  How will they be applied to new developments and how will they be measured?

Comment

Representation ID: 14200

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Judith Critchley

I&O_14744

Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 14420

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Robin Turney

I&O_14964

Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 14628

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Andrews

I&O_15178
You couldn’t get 2 more distinct sets of objectives – why are we choosing one over the other – we know we need to protect the environment and we are now at the point of damage limitation when it comes to Climate Change but a common sense approach is needed – what is possible ?  What is achievable ?     

Comment

Representation ID: 14702

Received: 02/09/2025

Respondent: Darnhall Parish Council

I&O_15252
Darnhall Parish Council notes the objectives for the Local Plan, some of which may need to be revised including changes to the national planning framework which make the protection of the North Cheshire Green Belt and Cheshire countryside more challenging, as well as the objectives set out in the Sustainability Appraisal. Darnhall Parish Council is aware that the two options set out by CWAC for the Local Plan are to use and update the current Local Plan objectives (Option A - covering economic, social, and environmental goals) or to use the objectives set out in the Sustainability Appraisal (Option B - covering areas such as air quality, energy, waste, heritage, housing, health, transport, economy). Darnhall Parish Council has no agreed view on these options.

Comment

Representation ID: 14952

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Ainscough Strategic Land

Agent: Turley

I&O_15511
ASL considers that whilst the Council may take inspiration from the objectives of the current Local Plan (i.e. Option A) and the Sustainability Appraisal (i.e. Option B), that it should prepare objectives specific to the emerging Local Plan, that address the issues and challenges that are current in CWAC and which seek to support the realisation of the vision. In particular, this includes ensuring there is sufficient land available to meet local housing (and employment) needs, with a suitable range of sites to accommodate a mix of tenures, including affordable homes.

Comment

Representation ID: 15044

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire Garden Village Ltd

Agent: AshtonHale

I&O_15603
CGV support the objectives taken from the Local Plan Update 2023: Sustainability Appraisal Report which provide a comprehensive framework for bringing forward sustainable development. They support a balanced approach to environmental protection, social wellbeing, and economic growth, which are key considerations in the release of Green Belt land. CGV believes that their site, land off Chester Way, complies with each of the relevant objectives outlined within Option ‘B’, as detailed below.  [See attached review of LAA site 1663 against SA objectives]
Option B - use the Sustainability Appraisal objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 15135

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Views Holdings Limited

Agent: AshtonHale

I&O_15694
Views supports the objectives taken from the Local Plan Update 2023: Sustainability Appraisal Report which provide a comprehensive framework for bringing forward sustainable development. They support a balanced approach to environmental protection, social wellbeing, and economic growth. Views believes that Land off London Road, Davenham complies with each of the relevant objectives outlined within Option ‘B’, as detailed below. [See attached site appraisal against SA objectives] 
Option B - use the Sustainability Appraisal objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 15186

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Barratt Redrow Plc

Agent: Pegasus Planning Group Ltd

I&O_15745
In respect of the objectives, we support the HBF position that whilst the Council may take inspiration from the objectives of the current Local Plan and the Sustainability Appraisal, that it should prepare objectives specific to this Plan, that address the issues and challenges that are current in Cheshire West, including acute housing need as noted above.

Comment

Representation ID: 15289

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Peel NRE Limited

Agent: Turley

I&O_15848
C. Neither of these.
Neither of these

Comment

Representation ID: 15375

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Barlow Trust Fund

Agent: Cassidy & Ashton Group Ltd

I&O_15934
The Trust are supportive of the retention of objective SO1, which enables Northwich to continue to develop, ancillary to the role of Chester as a sub-regional city and therefore, be a suitable place for ongoing development. As part of a second tier in terms of the spatial strategy to accommodate future development, Northwich provides a key focus in the east of the Borough. Northwich is defined as the town of Northwich and adjacent settlements of Anderton, Barnton, Davenham, Hartford, Lostock Gralam, Lower Marston, Lower Wincham, Rudheath and Weaverham. It is the secondary settlements, such as Lostock Gralam, that offer opportunity for expansion of an appropriate scale. Maintaining the character of the settlements whilst increasing population to support local schools and services. Such settlements are sustainably-located to benefit from the services and facilities of Northwich itself, whilst being able to develop independently. Particular focus should be placed on those settlements with a train station, offering strong sustainability credentials, such as Lostock Gralam.  The Trust are supportive of the retention of objective SO9 which focuses development within and on the edge of main urban areas and key service centres. This is in accordance with all suggested spatial strategies which focus the largest areas of development on key service centres. Objective SO10 aims to protect the Green Belt. Whilst the Trust are not necessarily against the suggested objective, there are two key points to consider: New national policy regarding Grey Belt opportunities for development within the Green Belt. Given this, and in consideration against the Council’s current housing position aligned with the new NPPF policy, it is submitted that the  Council must support those sites that merit consideration as a Grey Belt opportunity, subject to infrastructure improvements in the locality, open space / recreation / BNG improvements, and affordable housing provision 15% above standard LPA policy (will be 45%). The Trust land at Lostock Gralam offers such an opportunity. Release of Green Belt to accommodate necessary allocation for development, e.g. housing, is not prohibited by national policy.  Through reasoned strategic justification, boundaries can be amended through the Local Plan review process. If such an approach is pursued by the Council, The Trust land at Lostock Gralam provides such an opportunity, without compromising the sustainability principles of the Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 15409

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Consilio Bono

Agent: PWA Planning

I&O_15968
Given the changes in national planning policy, it would not be appropriate to simply roll forward objectives which are inherently out of date and inconsistent with much of the new guidance and priorities laid down in the new NPPF and national guidance. Accordingly, only Option B has any true legitimacy. In this regard, the sustainability appraisal objectives appear to reflect those in national guidance. Provided the objectives are underpinned by the primary objective which is to meet in full the development needs of the authority, use of these objectives makes the most sense and is supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 15435

Received: 21/10/2025

Respondent: Wirral Borough Council

I&O_15994
No comments at this stage

Comment

Representation ID: 15738

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Northern Powerhouse Land Ltd

Agent: Asteer Planning

I&O_16297
As explained at Section 3 of these representations, the new standard method has resulted in a substantial increase in CWaC’s LHN figure from 532dpa to 1,914dpa (259.77% increase). Furthermore, the Council has a five-year housing land supply position of 1.89 years. Therefore, there is clearly a need to develop on suitable sites that are located outside of the current settlement boundaries, such as in the Open Countryside. Consequently, Option A ‘Take forward the current Local Plan objectives’ is not an appropriate approach, particularly as objective SO10 refers to “maintaining the general extent and character of the North Cheshire Green Belt and Cheshire countryside”. Comments pertaining to Option B are provided in answer to Question OB 5 below.

Comment

Representation ID: 15827

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: West Midlands Pension Fund

Agent: Knight Frank

I&O_16386
Using the Sustainability Appraisal objectives (Option B) would be the most appropriate approach as the current Local Plan objectives are dated and national policy has evolved since these were established.
Option B - use the Sustainability Appraisal objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 16067

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John & Kathy Ricketts

I&O_16648
We support option A. 

Comment

Representation ID: 16123

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Rosemary Parkinson

I&O_16704
B