Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 11533

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12031
Before developing potential ‘growth’ areas ‘around’ Winsford, areas in need of regeneration within it should be redeveloped – and there should be no building on best quality agricultural land.

Comment

Representation ID: 11534

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12032
The flood plain and a small area of Grade Two agricultural land to the north east. Any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.

Comment

Representation ID: 11535

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12033
There should be no development on Green Belt and the Cuddington Neighbourhood Plan – which wants to see any development focused on previously developed land and infill sites – must be respected (https://cuddingtonandsandiwayonline.org/local-councils/76-neighbourhood-plan-reg15).

Comment

Representation ID: 11536

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12034
The adopted Neighbourhood Plan emphasises that only small-scale development in stipulated areas should be permitted.

Comment

Representation ID: 11537

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12035
Green Belt. In addition, any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.

Comment

Representation ID: 11538

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12036
The adopted Farndon Neighbourhood Plan does not allocate any specific development sites. It eschews small scale development and points out the extent of the recognised flood plain in the area (http://www.farndonparishcouncil.co.uk/?page_id=168).

Comment

Representation ID: 11539

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12037
There should be no building on the flood plain or on best quality agricultural land.

Comment

Representation ID: 11540

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12038
The flood plain and a significant swathe of Grade Two agricultural land to the north west. Any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.

Comment

Representation ID: 11541

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12039
The Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan was only ‘made’ as recently as November last year and must be respected. Based on a masterplan developed by AECOM, it identifies six sites, within the settlement boundary, for development (https://frodshamplan.org.uk/).

Comment

Representation ID: 11542

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12040
There should be no building on Green Belt or best quality farmland (e.g. the swathe of Grade Two agricultural land to the east and south east).