Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for CPRE Cheshire Branch search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 23
Representation ID: 11523
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12021
There should be no development on Green Belt or high-quality agricultural land.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 24
Representation ID: 11524
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12022
The city should not be allowed to sprawl into the countryside. Before developing potential ‘growth’ areas ‘around’ the city, areas in need of regeneration within it should be redeveloped.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 25
Representation ID: 11525
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12023
The surrounding Green Belt plus Grade Two agricultural land in the north west and to the south east. Any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 26
Representation ID: 11526
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12024
There should be no development on Green Belt or best quality agricultural land.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 27
Representation ID: 11527
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12025
Before developing potential ‘growth’ areas ‘around’ Ellesmere Port, areas in need of regeneration within it should be redeveloped.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 28
Representation ID: 11528
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12026
Green Belt and a sliver of Grade Two agricultural land immediately to the west of the built area. Any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 29
Representation ID: 11529
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12027
There should be no development on Green Belt or best quality agricultural land.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 30
Representation ID: 11530
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12028
The Northwich Neighbourhood Plan identified that there were significant areas of the town suitable for regeneration and where new development could be located on previously developed land (https://www.northwichtowncouncil.gov.uk/northwich-neighbourhood-plan/).
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 31
Representation ID: 11531
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12029
Green Belt and slivers of Grade Two agricultural land to the north west, west and south. Any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 32
Representation ID: 11532
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12030
The adopted Winsford Neighbourhood Plan sets out where it is appropriate for development to go and it illustrates where the flood plain is (https://winsford.gov.uk/policies/).