Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 11553

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12051
Neston and Parkgate are closely defined by the Green Belt and the Dee Estuary and the Neston Neighbourhood Plan relies heavily on that fact, only condoning Green Belt development where special circumstances can be proved and preferably only for affordable housing (https://neston.org.uk/council/neighbourhood-plan/).

Comment

Representation ID: 11554

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12052
There should be no development in Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 11555

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12053
The Green Belt, the salt marshes of the Dee Estuary and the Sandstone Ridge that Neston sits on. In addition, any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.

Comment

Representation ID: 11556

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12054
The Tarporley Neighbourhood Plan, the boundaries for which were revised last year, should be fully taken into account (https://www.tarporley.org.uk/tarporley-parish-council/neighbourhood-plan/).

Comment

Representation ID: 11558

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12056
There should be no building on high grade agricultural land.

Comment

Representation ID: 11559

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12057
The southern Sandstone Ridge and Sandstone Trail to the west and Grade Two agricultural land to the north east and east. Any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.

Comment

Representation ID: 11560

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12058
The Tarvin Neighbourhood Plan must be taken into consideration. It only condones infill development within the settlement (https://tarvinpc.tarvinonline.org/your-parish/neighbourhood-plan.html).

Comment

Representation ID: 11561

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12059
There should be no building on Green Belt or high-grade agricultural land. The housing allocations proposed are on Green Belt and the mixed-use allocation adjoins it.

Comment

Representation ID: 11562

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12060
Green Belt to north west and west and significant swathes of Grade Two agricultural land to the north west, north east and south. Any areas which are marked as grade 2 or 3 farmland on the Natural England map (and which therefore may be BMV – see our response to SS20) should be subject to detailed site survey (i.e. not just desk-based) carried out in accordance with Natural England guidance to inform any decisions about future development.

Comment

Representation ID: 11563

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12061
The Tattenhall Neighbourhood Plan, currently being renewed, must be taken account of. It supports small scale development (https://tattenhallpc.co.uk/the-parish-council/the-neighbourhood-plan/).