Comment

Representation ID: 4578

Received: 21/08/2025

Respondent: Caroline Gallimore

NOR10, NOR08
I&O_4861
We urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49 - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 -opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services NB Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly -We also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre , where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village.

Comment

Representation ID: 4593

Received: 21/08/2025

Respondent: Pam Copsey

NOR08
I&O_4879
I think NOR08 is a good location, because although it is farm land there could be safe access from A556, following modification to the junction with School Lane. I feel it would be appropriate to develop this like Kingsmead, rather than small infill and provide buses, school and shops.

Comment

Representation ID: 4698

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Cathy Thiemicke

Q SS 29
I&O_5007
Not the ones around Barnton. Winnington/Barnton swing bridge cannot cope with any more traffic. Not the ones around Weaverham - the A49 cannot cope with any more traffic.

Comment

Representation ID: 4735

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: victoria rigby

I&O_5059
NOR11 as access to A49 and trains

Comment

Representation ID: 4932

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr John Szostek

I&O_5291
Option A.

Comment

Representation ID: 5053

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Gordon Adam

I&O_5412
All, as mapped.

Comment

Representation ID: 5135

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: TRACEY MANLEY

I&O_5499
I would urge consideration of any available brown field sites

Comment

Representation ID: 5313

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: The Bostock Estate

Agent: Fisher German LLP

I&O_5679
The NOR05 employment allocation and the adjacent land to the east represent the most suitable growth areas for Northwich. NOR05 provides a strategic employment opportunity, and the adjacent land, although currently designated as countryside, is a logical and sustainable location for residential development. Together, these areas create a cohesive mixed-use growth opportunity that supports Northwich’s economic and housing needs while leveraging existing infrastructure and connectivity, particularly via Shurlach Lane and the nearby A556. Northwich, as one of Cheshire West and Chester’s main towns, faces a housing supply shortfall. The Cheshire West and Chester Local Plan (Part One) identifies a borough-wide need to deliver approximately 19,850 new homes between 2010 and 2030, with Northwich contributing significantly to this target. However, recent housing delivery rates in Northwich have lagged behind annual targets, contributing to an estimated shortfall of several hundred units over recent years. Furthermore, the revised NPPF and updated Standard Method, published in December 2024, have led to a significant increase in the borough’s Local Housing Need. As of August 2025, the minimum annual housing requirement for Cheshire West and Chester has risen from approximately 374 dwellings per annum (dpa) to 865 dpa, reflecting the latest affordability adjustment factor. This substantial increase necessitates the identification and allocation of additional residential sites to meet this need in full. Allocating the land adjacent to NOR05 for residential development would help address this deficit, contribute to the borough’s five-year housing land supply, and meet local affordability pressures.

Comment

Representation ID: 5349

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jonathan WILLS

I&O_5719
Sites NOR03, NOR04, NOR05, NOR06, NOR07, NOR08 and NOR09 seem to be the best sites availabile in terms of the accessibility to transport links (Hartford, Greenbank and Northwich train stations) and lack of impact on Greenbelt. 

Comment

Representation ID: 5557

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cllr Dan Marr

I&O_5929
I consider NOR02, NOR03 and NOR01 most suitable for development in Northwich.   NOR05 and NOR04 could be further considered for "Mixed" use rather than pure employment sites, given the proximity to both rail and road connections (including a site for a potential railway station).

Comment

Representation ID: 5611

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: DERWENT DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT LTD

Agent: ATP

I&O_5983
We agree that opportunities for growth to the north-east of Northwich should be encouraged, particularly where there is proximity to public transport infrastructure and existing local services. To that extent, the identified location for residential uses at NOR2 has merit but it is evidently distinct from the existing settlement. We conclude that additional opportunities should be identified on the edge of Wincham and Higher Wincham (such as site ID 0743).

Comment

Representation ID: 5616

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Acton Bridge Parish Council

I&O_5988
We are only commenting on those around Weaverham. Of the 3 areas NOR10, NOR 11 and NOR 12, we consider NOR10 to be most suitable as this maintains the separation between Acton Bridge and Weaverham most clearly. NOR 12 is the next most suitable and NOR 11 the least suitable. NOR 11 also has the risk of flooding.

Comment

Representation ID: 5639

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Chris Cowell

I&O_6011
NOR01

Comment

Representation ID: 5732

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Pamela Manning

I&O_6104
NOR 11 and NOR12 around Weaverham are not suitable as prime agricultural land and green space between villages. NOR10 was railway sidings and should be brown belt.  This combined with adoption of the ring road from Wallerscote to Weaverham round-about would reduce the traffic through the centre of Weaverham and take some off the Winnington Swing Bridge, which was another recommendation for replacement in the Northwich Transport Strategy.

Comment

Representation ID: 5860

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Andrew Rowe

I&O_6232
Proximity to sub centres with active travel at the forefront of your thinking should be the priority. 

Comment

Representation ID: 5872

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Catherine Gregory

Question SS 29
I&O_6248
Areas outside of the Green Belt - NOR06, NOR07 and NOR08

Comment

Representation ID: 5884

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Adam Webster

NOR01 - Barnton, NOR05 - Land near Gadbrook Park, NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556, NOR10 - Weaverham
I&O_6269
We strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR01 - Barnton - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links A559, M56, and access to existing village facilities, Doctors Dentists shops and schools. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements NOR05 - Land near Gadbrook Park We attended an open briefing by the landowners who discussed using this site for a large logistics warehouse. It is our opinion that this land should be subject to a change of use and would be better used for residential development. It would have excellent access to the A556 - Chester - Manchester, Crewe, M6J19/J18 etc. and would mirror a similar housing development almost opposite.  Gadbrook Park, since Barclays Bank left their two large sites there, it has freed up more than adequate office space for any new start up businesses, or businesses looking to relocate to the area This scheme would also give CWAC and Network Rail the opportunity to build a much needed railway station in Rudheath which could be used for passenger and potentially freight purpose. NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and proximity to Hartford Railway station and Northwich town centre Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on Davenham directly, although in busy times it's a given that Hartford Road would be used as a rat run - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure, good road network with easy access to the A49 shops, doctors, dentists and schools and capacity to accommodate further planned growth. In our opinion the site would create an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. We also believe any developer as part of any planning permission granted a condition should be to potentially fund a new access road into (out of) Northwich to alleviate the pressure on the Winnington Lane bridge to /from Anderton, Barnton

Comment

Representation ID: 6073

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Tim O'Keeffe

I&O_6462
I do not consider NOR01 to be a suitable growth area.

Comment

Representation ID: 6211

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Nolan

I&O_6609
Areas NOR 02-09

Comment

Representation ID: 6236

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sue White

SS29
I&O_6634
  We urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49 - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 -opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services NB Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly -We also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village

Comment

Representation ID: 6288

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Adrian Birchenough

SS29
I&O_6695
We urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49 - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 -opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services NB Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly -We also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village

Comment

Representation ID: 6536

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Philip Marshall

I&O_6953
Only those referenced within Option 2, for the reasons highlighted throughout this submission. 

Comment

Representation ID: 6546

Received: 22/08/2025

Respondent: Freda Large

I&O_6963
CWAC  Can't even look after Davenham. We can't have our 2p zebra crossings back. Roads are poorly looked after loads of potholes. High speed are achieved through Davenham all day we need proper speed cameras day and night. School is over subscribed  When grass is cut it's like making hay we want it looked after like Kingsmead. No Community centre  Church Street to King's Street a nightmare any one with a trailer tool's bouncing out into the road. We the residents and Parrish Council are nor listened to. Go and build in Tarporley instead. We urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49 - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 -opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services NB Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly -We also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village Question 30. - Do you have any further comments about any of the growth areas identified around Northwich - NOR01 - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links (A559), and access to existing village facilities. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements Question 31 -Are there any constraints, including Infrastructure provision, that should be considered for Northwich/DAVENHAM when developing the new Local Plan - NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan  

Comment

Representation ID: 6605

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Will Holden

I&O_7025
Development to the south should be favoured to preserve green belt land

Comment

Representation ID: 6728

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Tim Parr

I&O_7150
I’d s uggest that greater consideration is given to the following areas: - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure, capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49 - NOR08 - the land adjoining the A556 - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links to the A556 and access to main services. Traffic impact from this site would be less impactful on Hartford and Davenham. However, this is a green belt site and I would urge the council to consider the environmental, climate and biodiversity impact of continuing to develop out along the Weaver, further reducing the green corridor. -I also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre , where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village  

Comment

Representation ID: 7136

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Lucy Coles

Map 5.6
I&O_7608
We suggest the following areas are most suitable for growth: NOR01 (Barnton) - this area has good access to transport links (eg A559, M56) and existing facilities. Although a green belt area, there would be minimal impact on the surrounding landscape. NOR05-(Nr Gadbrook Park) - this area has excellent transport links via access to the A556 and, via a change of use, could be better used for residential development, mirroring the successful development opposite this site. NOR08 (Land adjoining A556) - this area has good scope for transport links (road and rail), meaning a lessened traffic impact on the nearby village of Davenham. NOR10 (Weaverham) - this area has facilities and road access to support further expansion, although this should be conditional on the developer addessing the bottleneck of the Winnington Lane bridge. The existing infrastructure and easy access to shops, docotrs, dentists and schools should allow for a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements.

Comment

Representation ID: 7184

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: David Lees

I&O_7659
Nor 6

Comment

Representation ID: 7202

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Nik Darwin

I&O_7680
Employment sites at Gadbrook are appropriate given that there are few options for employment uses close to stations and it is close to established road transport infrastructure which has been improved. For housing NOR 02 09 11 and 12 are within a short distance of a station and therefore preferred locations for development. There needs to be a clear understaning of TTWA for current and new population to understand likely travel patterns for increased population as Northwich has fairly limited employment opportunities.    

Comment

Representation ID: 7372

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Alison McKay

I&O_7852
Option A.

Comment

Representation ID: 7386

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Councillor Mark Stocks

I&O_7866
I SUPPORT OPTION A