Comment

Representation ID: 13

Received: 05/07/2025

Respondent: Daniel Hind

I&O_15
All of the areas are suitable - although the developments must be accompanied by improvements to transport and services

Comment

Representation ID: 41

Received: 07/07/2025

Respondent: Chris Jackson

I&O_44
SS 29 No 6 ,7 ,8 ,9 look the best options here .

Comment

Representation ID: 507

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Historic England

I&O_590
Any option should be accompanied by a robust assessment of the historic environment, heritage assets and their setting to inform the best solution.

Comment

Representation ID: 769

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Elaine Fenech

I&O_873
NOR01

Comment

Representation ID: 783

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Dave Bell

I&O_887
NOR4/NOR5

Comment

Representation ID: 806

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Janet Gormley

I&O_910
  None   

Comment

Representation ID: 841

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Andrew Oliver

I&O_945
None

Comment

Representation ID: 845

Received: 05/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Dale

I&O_949
NOR 01 to NOR 06 and NOR 10 are the most suitable.

Comment

Representation ID: 864

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Debbie Bennett

I&O_968
NOR01, NOR09, NOR10, NOR11, NOR12,

Comment

Representation ID: 880

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Angela Capstick

I&O_984
NOR02, NOR01

Comment

Representation ID: 897

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Jill Darlington

I&O_1001
NOR 04 and 05. NOR NOR 10, 11 and 12

Comment

Representation ID: 914

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Allan Aston

I&O_1018
01,09,10,11,12

Comment

Representation ID: 927

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Vicky Goodall

I&O_1031
NOR02, NOR03, NOR09, NOR11

Comment

Representation ID: 939

Received: 31/08/2025

Respondent: Dee Rowan

I&O_1043
None

Comment

Representation ID: 1001

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Shaun Roche

I&O_1106
Nor07 & 08

Comment

Representation ID: 1012

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Christian

I&O_1117
NOR09 and NOR10

Comment

Representation ID: 1025

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Mark Metcalfe

I&O_1130
NOR2 & NOR3 - Having employment and Housing close-by is a good idea and the location has good access routes to the A559 & A556. NOR10 & 11 - Naturally extends the housing in the area and is close to good access (A49) NOR09 - Good access to the A556 NOR08 - Good access to the A556, though the woodland in the area needs to be protected. NOR05 & 06 - Good for employment opportunities.

Comment

Representation ID: 1067

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Jenny Day

I&O_1172
Of the options available, NOR08 & NOR04

Comment

Representation ID: 1101

Received: 06/08/2025

Respondent: Julie Smith

I&O_1206
Option A

Comment

Representation ID: 1214

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Milnes

I&O_1319
NOR08 and NOR09

Comment

Representation ID: 1226

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Jennifer Hart

I&O_1331
I am supportive of further consideration of NOR08 as a potential growth area (land adjoining A556, opposite Hartford). This area could be developed into an entirely new village with excellent transport links without affecting traffic in or the character of any of the nearby existing settlements. The direct access to the A556 and close proximity to Hartford Railway Station would seem to make this a great place to consider. I also encourage concerted effort to regenerate Northwich town centre. There seems to be a lot of wasted space that contributes to a sense of neglect. Smarter use of brownfield land and under-used commercial areas could help meet some of the demand for new housing. I would support the authorities to look into further expansion of Winnington Village as a means of meeting demand for new housing.

Comment

Representation ID: 1464

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Sara Summers Muir

I&O_1569
I oppose development in the Green Belt around Northwich. If development is unavoidable, it should be directed to non-Green Belt, previously developed locations closest to existing transport and services — not to open countryside.  

Comment

Representation ID: 1494

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: Sue Clough

I&O_1602
Option A - retain the greenbelt. The infrastructure in Northwich has not been adapted to cope with the recent increase in housing, especially in the Winnington area. This causes all sorts of issues, you can't bring in thousands of new residents without ensuring the surrounding roads can cope with the extra traffic. Therefore the option to retain the greenbelt looks the most attractive and sustainable for existing residents.

Comment

Representation ID: 1512

Received: 06/08/2025

Respondent: Victoria Glover

I&O_1620
NOR03 and NOR04, NOR05 are my preferred development opportunities in Northwich. 

Comment

Representation ID: 1537

Received: 06/08/2025

Respondent: Matt Aubrey

I&O_1645
1,2,10,11,12

Comment

Representation ID: 1556

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Majella Davies

I&O_1664
I really think the council should give consideration to the following area's: NOR10 : Weaverham  - this area already has the infrastructure and the capacity to accommodate further planned growth and to deliver a mix of housing and has a good access to the A49. NOR08: Land adjoining the A556 opposite Hartford where here development would benefit from transport links A556.  Further regeneration of Northwich Town Centre where Brownfield land and underused Commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable mix use housing development should be considered together with further expansion of Winnington Village. NOR01: although this area has currently been identified as a green belt site,  the expansion to the North East of Barton should be considered due to its proximity to major transport links A559 & access to the existing village facilities.  It would have minimal impact on surrounding landscape.  It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. NOR06 -NOR07: Davenham is a historic village and has a strong sense of identity & designated Conservation Area.  The proposed development would dramatically alter the rural character of the village and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community.   The scale of the development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village size and setting.

Comment

Representation ID: 1563

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Robina Gration

I&O_1671
I urge the council to give greater consideration to the following areas: NOR10 Weaverham which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49. NOR08 Land adjoining the A556, opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links on the A556 and access to main services. Although this is green belt the traffic form this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly. We also believe that further regeneration of Northwich town centre where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable mixed use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington village.

Comment

Representation ID: 1566

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Keith Gration

I&O_1674
I urge the council to give greater consideration to the following areas: NOR10 Weaverham which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49. NOR08 Land adjoining the A556, opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links on the A556 and access to main services. Although this is green belt the traffic form this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly. We also believe that further regeneration of Northwich town centre where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable mixed use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington village.

Comment

Representation ID: 1590

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Linda Dewsbury

I&O_1700
We are writing in respect of the proposed CWAC local plan consultation in particular as regards Davenham Parish Council. We have seen the Parish Councils answers to questions 29, 30 and 31. In addition we make the following comments for your consideration. Question 29   Mentions further expansion of Winnington Village.  However we understand that the proposal for over 1000 houses on the former ICI land was not approved without the situation over Winnington Bridge being resolved.   As relates to Winnington Bridge (an outdated single line bridge which from time to time takes detoured traffic from the Motorway network).  Applications to improve this by a modern system has been declined at least twice by central government for funding.  Without any such improvements (which have received favourable views locally) then it seems unfair to increase housing without a better infrastructure.  Surely if it is required to meet government targets relating to housing the Bridge Project should be a definite consideration before any significant housing increase.

Comment

Representation ID: 1593

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Chris Woodburn

I&O_1703
Firstly there is ample empty properties in Northwich town centre. Surely they should be the priority for affordable housing (ie flats).  There is also an further opportunity in Winnington village which would be easier and less environmentally damaging. Of those listed the 2 that could be considered are NOR10 Weaverham (existing infrastructure and access to A49) plus NOR08 A556 Hartford (easy access to A556 and would not place direct added strain on either Harford or Davenham directly).