Comment

Representation ID: 13644

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Joanne Driffield

SS 29
I&O_14163
We urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49 - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 -opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services NB Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly -We also believe that the   further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land, empty/abandoned properties and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village around Northwich

Comment

Representation ID: 13676

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Jack Arnold

NOR01
I&O_14195
I am writing to object to the proposal of 1500+ houses being built on the land to the north of Barnton. We currently have 3 shops, 1 pub and 1 school in the village. We cannot possibly cope with so many new people in the village.  Not only this, but to build on green belt land would be a massive shame.  Please, please reconsider.  Shame on you and the developers for even considering this. 

Comment

Representation ID: 13700

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Andrew Turner

NOR06 / NOR07 / NOR08
I&O_14220
I believe Northwich town centre is more suited to housing development for it has the infrastructure and amenities to cope with additional traffic, shops, etc.

Comment

Representation ID: 13717

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: John Edwardson

NOR07
I&O_14237
In response to the Local Plan and in particular NOR07 (Land off Eaton Lane), please note my following comments: We live opposite the top of Eaton Lane on Hartford Road. Volume and nature of traffic use is already too high (and dangerous), especially after the introduction of traffic lights (a baffling decision, ill thought out) off the A556 basically encouraging drivers to use Hartford Road as a cut through. The road is not suitable for current levels of traffic. Adding circa 440 houses on Eaton Lane, meaning at least 880 cars will go beyond breaking point on both Hartford Road and also Eaton Lane. Please also note, that other than local volunteers, we never see police with speed guns and it seems to be a forgotten route (its obviously easier to park a van on the bypass in a layby, which inherently is a far safer road) The land in question (NOR07) is beautiful open countryside / farm land, which is enjoyed by local residents and the like for exercise, dog walking, children playing etc. It is hard to imagine a less suitable site than this for a large sprawling housing estate and all that that brings with it (more surface water issues, noise, extensive prolonged building projects) The destruction of well established wildlife habitats (tick box mitigation measures would not replace what is there currently). We see badgers, foxes, owls, bats and much more wildlife on a daily basis. In addition to this, there is also substantial, established flora and fauna Increasing the size of a small village like Davenham on this scale would hugely affect its identity and character. Most residents have chosen to live here purely because of this. This proposal is massively disproportionate Prime, productive farmland would be destroyed forever Primary school already over subscribed Doctors and dentists are not available in Davenham Parking is already causing the residents major issues I would strongly urge Cheshire West and Chester to reconsider this proposal, not least because of the above points Without sounding like a NIMBY, I have lived in the village most of my adult life, and whilst it has changed over the years, it still retains a village feel and has a strong community spirit. I feel that this would be lost forever, if this wholly inappropriate proposal went ahead as it would effectively turn it into a town, without any of a towns infrastructure

Comment

Representation ID: 13775

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Carl Wood

NOR10
I&O_14295
NOR10 – Weaverham: Established infrastructure, capacity for growth, and excellent access to the A49 make this a logical choice for balanced, mixed housing.   Northwich Town Centre regeneration: Brownfield and underused sites should be prioritised to deliver sustainable, mixed-use housing, revitalising the town and protecting surrounding green space.   Winnington Village expansion: Further controlled growth here would build on existing community facilities and infrastructure.  Future housing growth must go where it fits, using existing infrastructure, protecting green space, and keeping community character intact. 

Comment

Representation ID: 13811

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Paul and Linda Jones

I&O_14331
We strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR01  -  Barnton  - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links A559, M56, and access to existing village facilities, Doctors Dentists shops and schools. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements -NOR05 - Land near Gadbrook Park  We attended an open briefing by the landowners who discussed using this site for a large logistics warehouse. It is our opinion that this land should be subject to a change of use and would be better used for residential development. It would have excellent access to the A556 - Chester - Manchester, Crewe, M6J19/J18 etc. and would mirror a similar housing development almost opposite. Gadbrook Park, since Barclays Bank left their two large sites there, it has freed up more than adequate office space for any new start up businesses, or businesses looking to relocate to the area This scheme would also give CWAC and Network Rail the opportunity to build a much needed railway station in Rudheath which could be used for passenger and potentially freight purpose - NOR08  -  Land adjoining the A556  - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and proximity to Hartford Railway station and Northwich town centre Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on Davenham directly,  although in busy times it's a given that Hartford Road would be  used as a rat run - NOR10  -  Weaverham , which has existing infrastructure, good road network with easy access to the A49 shops, doctors, dentists and schools and capacity to accommodate further planned growth. In our opinion the site would create an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. We also believe any developer as part of any planning permission granted a condition should be to potentially fund a new access road into (out of) Northwich to alleviate the pressure on the Winnington Lane bridge to /from Anderton, Barnton

Comment

Representation ID: 13841

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Claire Swithenbank

I&O_14361
We strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: NOR01 - Barnton - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links A559, M56, and access to existing village facilities, Doctors Dentists shops and schools. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements NOR05 - Land near Gadbrook Park We attended an open briefing by the landowners who discussed using this site for a large logistics warehouse. It is our opinion that this land should be subject to a change of use and would be better used for residential development. It would have excellent access to the A556 - Chester - Manchester, Crewe, M6J19/J18 etc. and would mirror a similar housing development almost opposite. Gadbrook Park, since Barclays Bank left their two large sites there, it has freed up more than adequate office space for any new start up businesses, or businesses looking to relocate to the  area This scheme would also give CWAC and Network Rail the opportunity to build a much needed railway station in Rudheath which could be used for passenger and potentially freight purpose. NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and proximity to Hartford Railway station and Northwich town centre Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on Davenham directly, although in busy times it's a given that Hartford Road would be used as a rat run - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure, good road network with easy access to the A49 shops, doctors, dentists and schools and capacity to accommodate further planned growth. In our opinion the site would create an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. We also believe any developer as part of any planning permission granted a condition should be to potentially fund a new access road into (out of) Northwich to alleviate the pressure on the Winnington Lane bridge to /from Anderton, Barnton.

Comment

Representation ID: 13901

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Rachel Swithenbank

I&O_14421
We strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: NOR01 - Barnton - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links A559, M56, and access to existing village facilities, Doctors Dentists shops and schools. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements NOR05 - Land near Gadbrook Park We attended an open briefing by the landowners who discussed using this site for a large logistics warehouse. It is our opinion that this land should be subject to a change of use and would be better used for residential development. It would have excellent access to the A556 - Chester - Manchester, Crewe, M6J19/J18 etc. and would mirror a similar housing development almost opposite. Gadbrook Park, since Barclays Bank left their two large sites there, it has freed up more than adequate office space for any new start up businesses, or businesses looking to relocate to the  area This scheme would also give CWAC and Network Rail the opportunity to build a much needed railway station in Rudheath which could be used for passenger and potentially freight purpose. NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and proximity to Hartford Railway station and Northwich town centre Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on Davenham directly, although in busy times it's a given that Hartford Road would be used as a rat run - NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure, good road network with easy access to the A49 shops, doctors, dentists and schools and capacity to accommodate further planned growth. In our opinion the site would create an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. We also believe any developer as part of any planning permission granted a condition should be to potentially fund a new access road into (out of) Northwich to alleviate the pressure on the Winnington Lane bridge to /from Anderton, Barnton.

Comment

Representation ID: 13904

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Jane Smart

I&O_14424
Question 29 - Which of the potential growth areas around Northwich do you consider the most suitable?  I urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: -  NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49. NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 -opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services NB Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly. I also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village   NOR01 - Although currently identified as a green belt site, expansion to the North-east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links (A559), and access to existing village facilities. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements 

Comment

Representation ID: 14043

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Landowner (Cogshall Lane)

Agent: Carden Group

I&O_14580
We consider that the growth area identified as NOR01 to be the most suitable for residential development around Northwich. The site is located less than 2 miles from the town centre, providing direct access to a wide range of services, retail, and employment opportunities. In addition, it lies within easy walking distance of a number of local amenities in Barnton, including the Co-op store, library, Barnton Community Nursery, and Barnton Primary School, which ensures that new residents could access day-to-day services without reliance on private vehicles. Its size and location also offer the opportunity to deliver supporting infrastructure and services, such as additional local facilities or improvements to public transport, including bus services connecting to the town centre and surrounding areas. Compared to other growth areas around Northwich, NOR01 benefits from its proximity to existing communities, a clearly defined and contained site boundary, and an enclosed position that avoids merging settlements, making it highly suitable for logical Green Belt release. Furthermore, the site’s accessibility, containment, and integration with existing development reduce the environmental and infrastructure risks often associated with more remote or fragmented growth areas. Its combination of scale, deliverability, and potential for creating a sustainable, well-connected community means it represents a strategically advantageous choice for residential development in the emerging Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 14055

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Graham Birkett

NOR10, NOR08
I&O_14592
- NOR10 - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49 - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 -opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services NB Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly -We also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village

Comment

Representation ID: 14120

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonny McGowan

I&O_14663
We strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR01 - Barnton - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links A559, M56, and access to existing village facilities, Doctors Dentists shops and schools. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements -NOR05 - Land near Gadbrook Park We attended an open briefing by the landowners who discussed using this site for a large logistics warehouse. It is our opinion that this land should be subject to a change of use and would be better used for residential development. It would have excellent access to the A556 - Chester - Manchester, Crewe, M6J19/J18 etc. and would mirror a similar housing development almost opposite. Gadbrook Park, since Barclays Bank left their two large sites there, it has freed up more than adequate office space for any new start up businesses, or businesses looking to relocate to the area This scheme would also give CWAC and Network Rail the opportunity to build a much needed railway station in Rudheath which could be used for passenger and potentially freight purpose - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and proximity to Hartford Railway station and Northwich town centre Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on Davenham directly, although in busy times it's a given that Hartford Road would be used as a rat run - NOR10 - Weaverham , which has existing infrastructure, good road network with easy access to the A49 shops, doctors, dentists and schools and capacity to accommodate further planned growth. In our opinion the site would create an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. We also believe any developer as part of any planning permission granted a condition should be to potentially fund a new access road into (out of) Northwich to alleviate the pressure on the Winnington Lane bridge to /from Anderton, Barnton

Comment

Representation ID: 14122

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Ryan Buckley

NOR08, NOR10
I&O_14665
We urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR10  - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49.  - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556, opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services. NB Although Green belt, the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly. I also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village.

Comment

Representation ID: 14140

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Lynne Field

NOR10, NOR11, NOR12
I&O_14684
As a resident of Davenham (73 years) I'd like to draw your attention to the  following points which emphasise reasons why these Growth Areas should not be adopted Local roads - with reference  to NOR06 and NOR07 particularly the local  road network, London Road and Hartford Road Davenham, are already  congested at busy times and the additional housing would make these  unusable and unsafe. There is no obvious way of improving these  residential streets to cater for more traffic. A556  - with reference to all three Growth Areas, again at busy times  this major artery is already congested with queueing stationary traffic  at the two roundabouts and three sets of traffic lights between School  Road Hartford and King Street Northwich. There is no capacity left in  the road. Schools, doctors and dentists - 2,200 additional homes are estimated on  the proposal - that could be 4,000 people and 2,000 children needing  services. Schools are full, there is no doctor in Davenham and dentists  are under similar pressure. Water, sewerage, electricity and gas  provision would similarly be under considerable strain. Loss of amenities - referring to NOR07 and NOR08 particularly. These are  currently countryside and farming areas with Grade 1 Agricultural land  surrounded by woodland and footpaths going down to the River Weaver and  Vale Royal Locks. They give valuable recreational and mental health  provision to the residents of the village and during Covid especially  they were much used, being adjacent to the as village as we were not  allowed to travel. In addition, covering these areas with housing and roads would increase  the risk of flooding to Eaton Lane and Hartford Road, already vulnerable  as has been shown in recent winter storms. In conclusion, doubling the size of the village would be detrimental not  only for the residents of the area, but those attempting to pass through  on the main routes north south and east west to the parts of Cheshire  and beyond

Comment

Representation ID: 14144

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Vicky Wood

NOR10
I&O_14688
NOR10 – Weaverham: Established infrastructure, capacity for growth, and excellent access to the A49 make this a logical choice for balanced, mixed housing. · Northwich Town Centre regeneration: Brownfield and underused sites should be prioritised to deliver sustainable, mixed-use housing, revitalising the town and protecting surrounding green space. · Winnington Village expansion: Further controlled growth here would build on existing community facilities and infrastructure.

Comment

Representation ID: 14174

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Nicola Buckley

I&O_14718
We urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR10  - Weaverham, which has existing infrastructure and capacity to accommodate further planned growth and an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing with good access to the A49.  - NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556, opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and access to main services. NB Although Green belt, the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on either Hartford or Davenham directly. I also believe that the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed-use housing development should be considered, together with further expansion of Winnington Village

Comment

Representation ID: 14399

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Andrew Pozniak

NOR01, NOR05, NOR08, NOR10
I&O_14943
We strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following sites, which offer more sustainable and infrastructure-ready alternatives to those currently proposed for Davenham: • NOR01 – Barnton (Northeast Expansion) While currently classed as Green Belt, this site benefits from excellent access to the A559 and M56, and is well-connected to existing village facilities, including shops, schools, doctors, and dentists. The landscape impact would be minimal, and the site has potential to deliver a balanced mix of housing in line with the Local Plan. • NOR05 – Land near Gadbrook Park This site has previously been discussed for commercial logistics use, but we believe it would be more appropriately designated for residential development. It has outstanding transport links via the A556, M6 (J18/19), and Crewe-Manchester corridor. The availability of vacant office space at Gadbrook Park (including two large units formerly occupied by Barclays) would mitigate the loss of employment land. Additionally, this site presents a unique opportunity to deliver a new railway station at Rudheath, serving both passenger and freight needs. • NOR08 – Land adjacent to A556 (opposite Hartford) Although Green Belt, this site benefits from superior transport infrastructure, being close to the A556 and Hartford railway station. Development here would be less likely to impact the Davenham community directly, though we acknowledge Hartford Road is already under pressure during peak times. • NOR10 – Weaverham Weaverham is well-positioned to accommodate further growth. It has robust infrastructure, access to the A49, and essential services such as schools, shops, doctors, and dentists. Development here could be tied to infrastructure contributions, such as a new access route into Northwich, easing pressure on the heavily congested Winnington Lane bridge.

Comment

Representation ID: 14405

Received: 30/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Davies

NOR01, NOR02, NOR08, NOR10
I&O_14949
I consider that the more suitable locations identified for potential growth areas are those in Northwich and close to Weaverham and Hartford (NOR01,02, N0R08 and 10), as these would utilise existing Brownfield sites, under occupied and unattractive commercial areas and areas of land adjacent to existing key infrastructure routes and transport and other community facilities that minimise impact on existing local villages.

Comment

Representation ID: 14413

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Thomas Beckwith

I&O_14957
We strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR01  -  Barnton  - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links A559, M56, and access to existing village facilities, Doctors Dentists shops and schools. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements -NOR05 - Land near Gadbrook Park  We attended an open briefing by the landowners who discussed using this site for a large logistics warehouse. It is our opinion that this land should be subject to a change of use and would be better used for residential development. It would have excellent access to the A556 - Chester - Manchester, Crewe, M6J19/J18 etc. and would mirror a similar housing development almost opposite. Gadbrook Park, since Barclays Bank left their two large sites there, it has freed up more than adequate office space for any new start upbusinesses, or businesses looking to relocate to the area This scheme would also give CWAC and Network Rail the opportunity to build a much needed railway station in Rudheath which could be used for passenger and potentially freight purpose  - NOR08  -  Land adjoining the A556  - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and proximity to Hartford Railway station and Northwich town centre Although Green belt the traffic from this proposed development would not add pressure on Davenham directly,  although in busy times it's a given that Hartford Road would be used as a rat run  - NOR10  -  Weaverham , which has existing infrastructure, good road network with easy access to the A49 shops, doctors, dentists and schools and capacity to accommodate further planned growth. In our opinion the site would create an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. We also believe any developer as part of any planning permission granted a condition should be to potentially fund a new access road into (out of) Northwich to alleviate the pressure on the Winnington Lane bridge to /from Anderton, Barnton    

Comment

Representation ID: 14440

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Davenham & Bostock Parish Council

NOR01, NOR04, NOR05, NOR08, NOR10
I&O_14984
I strongly urge the Council to give greater consideration to the following areas: - NOR01 - Barnton - Although currently identified as a green belt site the expansion to the North east of Barnton should be considered, due to its proximity to major transport links A559, M56, and access to existing village facilities, Doctors Dentists shops and schools. It would have minimal impacts on the surrounding landscape. It would also provide an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the Local Plan requirements   -NOR05 & NOR04- Land near Gadbrook Park It would be my opinion that this land should be subject to a change of use and would be better used for residential development. It would have excellent access to the A556 - Chester - Manchester, Crewe, M6J19/J18 etc. and would mirror a similar housing development almost opposite.  This scheme would also give CWAC and Network Rail the opportunity to build a much needed railway station in Rudheath which could be used for passenger and potentially freight purpose.   NOR08 - Land adjoining the A556 - opposite Hartford, where development would benefit from its better transport links A556 and proximity to Hartford Railway station and Northwich town centre.   NOR10 - Weaverham , which has existing infrastructure, good road network with easy access to the A49 shops, doctors, dentists and schools and capacity to accommodate further planned growth. This site would create an opportunity to deliver a mix of housing as per the local plan requirements. We also believe any developer as part of any planning permission granted a condition should be to potentially fund a new access road into (out of) Northwich to alleviate the pressure on the Winnington Lane bridge to /from Anderton, Barnton.

Comment

Representation ID: 14499

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Linda Eves

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_15044
Davenham is our home. Its heritage, countryside, and strong community make it special – and the proposed developments at NOR06 and NOR07 would irreversibly destroy that. These sites are far too large for the village, with hundreds of houses completely out of scale. Our roads are already congested, public transport minimal, and local services like doctors, dentists, and schools are at capacity. The land is prone to flooding, home to ancient trees, wildlife, and prime farmland – once lost, it cannot be restored. NOR06 sits next to a Conservation Area and a well-used footpath, while NOR07 is near a future hydrogen pipeline and working farms. There are far better options for sustainable growth around Northwich: • NOR01 (NE Barnton): Good infrastructure, minimal landscape impact, and mix of housing possible. • NOR04/05 (Gadbrook Park): Vacated offices could become homes with new sustainable transport links. • NOR08 (S of A556 opposite Hartford): Excellent access to roads and railway station. • NOR10 (Weaverham): Existing infrastructure, capacity for housing, and potential for a new access road to ease traffic. We are not against change, but it must be the right scale, in the right place, with proper support. These proposals would rip the heart out of Davenham. This is about protecting our homes, our families, and our children’s future. Once it’s gone, it’s gone forever. Please listen to the people who live here – we love our village, and we must protect it.

Comment

Representation ID: 14573

Received: 09/09/2025

Respondent: Julie Leigh

NOR11,NOR12,NOR10
I&O_15119
on regards to the proposed housing areas surrounding weaverham village (NOR11,NOR12,NOR10) in the answer ss11 I would like to choose option A Retain as Green Belt land.

Comment

Representation ID: 14614

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes, Diane Martin, Peter Martin & Brunel Trustees Limited

Agent: Emery Planning Partnership

NOR10
I&O_15164
Bloor Homes is promoting Weaverham South, which is identified within the consultation as growth option NOR10. Details of the site and the proposed allocation are provided in Section 6 of these representations.(see attachment)

Comment

Representation ID: 14619

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes, Diane Martin, Peter Martin & Brunel Trustees Limited

Agent: Emery Planning Partnership

NOR10
I&O_15169
Homes is promoting Weaverham South, which is identified within the consultation as growth option NOR10. Bloor Homes propose the site as an allocation for residential development. The site can deliver approximately 900-1,100 dwellings, as well as extensive green infrastructure, community facilities and (if required) land for the expansion of the adjacent Weaverham High School. Weaverham South represents a highly sustainable location that offers an exceptional opportunity for meeting housing needs in Northwich and Cheshire West. The site is in single ownership, under sole control of Bloor Homes and is subject to an exceptionally low level of constraint. The site is flat, subject to a very high level of visual containment, predominantly of low ecological value, and suitable access is readily available. These representations are accompanied by a comprehensive vision document (Appendix EP1) which has been prepared by Planit on behalf of Bloor Homes. The vision document provides: • An analysis of the site and its surroundings; • A masterplan and vision that articulates and illustrates the opportunities presented by the site; • A demonstration that the site is deliverable, available and achievable; and • A summary of the key benefits of the site. These representations are also supported by supporting technical statements in respect of the following matters: • Sustainable Transport Strategy report by Eddisons (Appendix EP2) • Landscape and Visual Technical Note by FPCR (Appendix EP3) • Ecological Feasibility Assessment report by UES (Appendix EP4) • Technical Note on Flood Risk and Drainage by Betts Associates (Appendix EP5) Further of details of the site and the proposed allocation are provided below.(see attachment)

Comment

Representation ID: 14620

Received: 05/09/2025

Respondent: Ian Fogg

NOR01, NOR10, NOR11, NOR12, NOR08
I&O_15170
Consideration should be given to the areas on the fringes of the large villages of Barnton and Weaverham (NOR01, NOR10, NOR11, and NOR12). This would involve some amendment to the boundaries of the North Cheshire greenbelt, however current demand for houses to accommodate population growth as well as social changes of the last 40-50 years warrants these difficult decisions. Further in the case of the greater Northwich area both Weaverham and Barnton have significant existing infrastructure including schools, both secondary and primary, shops, medical and leisure facilities. They also benefit from road links via the A559, A533, and A49 to the motorway system.  Smaller scale developments of groups of houses and infill in green belt settlements could also make a contribution to the areas housing requirements. The Governments "Grey Belt" announcements is a step towards the same. NOR08 has the advantage of potential access to the A556 and to services provided by the village of Hartford. Nationally there is a significant overprovision of town centre retail space due to the growth of online shopping and Northwich is no exception. Future plans should include the further  regeneration of Northwich town centre where brown field land and underused commercial areas provide an opportunity for mixed use housing development. Consideration should also be given to the further expansion of Winnington Village.

Comment

Representation ID: 14649

Received: 01/09/2025

Respondent: Jane Sharples

I&O_15199
  As a large and well-established village, on the flip side to this question I feel Weaverham is not a suitable ar ea for potential growth.  Weaverham already faces significant infrastructure challenges that make further residential development unsustainable. The village lacks the capacity to absorb additional housing without placing undue strain on essential services, transport links, and community resources.   One of the most pressing concerns is the A49, the main arterial road serving the area. This route is heavily congested during peak hours, incidents have highlighted how vulnerable the A49 is to disruption with closures causing widespread traffic chaos.   Adding more homes would only exacerbate this issue, increasing traffic volume and further compromising road safety and accessibility. Weaverham’s current infrastructure—roads, schools, healthcare facilities, and public transport—is stretched. Without significant investment and strategic planning, additional housing would risk diminishing the quality of life for existing residents and undermining the village’s character and cohesion. We urge planners and decision-makers to consider the long-term implications and to prioritize sustainable development that respects the limitations of our village infrastructure.

Comment

Representation ID: 14679

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Miller Homes North West Ltd

Agent: NJL Consulting

I&O_15229
As detailed throughout these representation, Miller Homes are promoting their site off Jack Lane, Davenham which lies to the south west of the growth option NO06. As such, we are of the view that this general area is most suitable however should be extended to cover Millers site.

Comment

Representation ID: 15067

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire Garden Village Ltd

Agent: AshtonHale

I&O_15626
While CGV’s land off Chester Way has not been identified as a potential growth area within the Issues and Options consultation, we consider it to be a logical and sustainable location for growth. The site is well-related to the existing built-up area of Northwich, benefits from strong transport connections, and is bounded by defensible features that prevent further sprawl. It offers a valuable opportunity to accommodate future development needs in a planned and contained manner and should therefore be considered in the next stages of the plan-making process. 

Comment

Representation ID: 15094

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Agent: Asteer Planning

I&O_15653
Persimmon consider that the site could be included as part of potential growth location NOR09, in the case that this is pursued within the chosen spatial strategy. The exclusion of the site from NOR09 would create an isolated wedge of open countryside land, which forms no functional purpose as ‘open countryside’, wedged between the existing settlement boundary and proposed residential growth. Notwithstanding this and under any growth option, land at Fullerton Road should be identified as a suitable and deliverable infill site that does not contribute to the wider open countryside setting; and which would form a natural and logical extension to recent successful residential developments at Albermarle Avenue (Redrow Hartford) and Fullerton Road (developed by Persimmon). The settlement of Northwich also has a range of major physical and policy constraints along its settlement edges (as illustrated in the Constraints Map of Northwich at Figure 8.1 of the Issues and Options Consultation, included as Figure 3 below). These include the Green Belt which bounds the settlement to the north, Areas of Special County Value (“ASCV”) to the northeast and south of Northwich and key settlement gaps, particularly around the south of the settlement. These constraints bolster the importance of makingthe most use of vacant, underutilised infill sites which could deliver much-needed housing with a very limited impact on the settlement boundary or any of the major identified physical and policy constraints. 

Comment

Representation ID: 15154

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Views Holdings Limited

Agent: AshtonHale

I&O_15713
Out of the growth options identified, area NOR06 appears to be in the most sustainable and logical location. Views support the extent of NOR06 and importantly the inclusion of Land off London Road, Davenham within it.