Comment

Representation ID: 5879

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Catherine Gregory

Question SS 31
I&O_6263
Specifically for NOR10, NOR11 and NOR12 (Weaverham). Increased pressure on healthcare provision as a result of the Winnington Urban Village housing development.   Need for extra pedestrian crossings near schools, improvement of footpaths eg Wallerscote Road and Station Road which are very narrow and improvement of road junctions eg Station Road out onto West Road. Need for additional car parking in the village centre to provide access to amenities. Public transport provision is limited with no evening or Sunday bus service .   Train stations at Cuddington, Acton Bridge and Hartford can only be accessed by car with very limited car parking and disabled access. Flooding from both the River Weaver on Sandy Lane and surface water has resulted in homes being flooded twice in three years.  NOR11 is sited close to Sandy Lane.  

Comment

Representation ID: 5914

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Adam Webster

Map 5.6 Northwich Growth Options
I&O_6300
Northwich It is a real positive to see the expansion of the Victoria Infirmary, but the town still suffers from a shortage of Doctors Dentists, Teachers - especially Special Education Needs and of course from an emergency services perspective the ever reducing fire service vis a vis more housing to provide cover for London Road, Chester Road Castle Street, Manchester Road - at peak times and Saturdays these roads are operating at capacity and many residents living on the outskirts will not travel into the town centre because of the traffic queues into town!! Highways need to consider park & ride (plus see our comments re NOR10 - Weaverham Davenham CWACs Local plan states that they will continue to:- 1. Protect the character of a village: allowing developers to double the size of Davenham is at odds with this 2. Promote wellbeing: these proposals would allow development on green spaces 3. Only consider Prime farmland in exceptional circumstances - Both NOR06 & NOR07 are both considered to be prime farmland 4. Ensure there is appropriate infrastructure! Roads at capacity, Buses infrequent and availability not conducive to regular use. Trains require users to drive to all nearby stations - car parking is costly and limited - NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns.  Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services.  The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives.  There is no Doctors or Dentists surgery in the village and the primary school is operating at capacity. The bus service is limited and there is no access to a railway station without driving at least 15 mins to Hartford, Northwich or Plumley   NOR06 - Land to the rear of Church Street and London Road ● Lack of adequate infrastructure is already known to CWAC Highways. This area would require access via two of the three busiest streets in the village! These roads operate at capacity at peak times ● A known and designated conservation area is situated in the centre of NOR06 ● NOR06 is home to two working farms and both of these landowners (either side of the Conservation area) have publicly stated they have no intention of selling their farms ● We are aware of a 72 Bed Dementia care nursing home currently working its way through the planning process - When approved, it will take land in NOR06 and increase traffic via staff visitors and suppliers ● There is a long established footpath here that would need to be protected ● A large sewage pipe runs across this land ● The land falls steeply down to Elderbriar brook. This would be overwhelmed with substantial surface water. It feeds into the River Dane near the old stone bridge and this area has seen a broad area of flooded farmland in recent years. ● The area is known for its diverse fauna and flora with ancient trees that are home to a variety of birds ● The grass areas are homes to foxes hedgehogs bees etc and should be protected under existing wildlife and conservation requirements/regulations NOR07 - Land off Eaton lane - currently down a single track lane ● Another Infrastructure hotspot known to CWAC Highways, as all current traffic from Eaton Lane, Eaton Crescent & Pritchard Drive, have to use Hartford road (The third known busiest road in the village) to access the A556 ● There has been serious flooding around the junction of Eaton Land and Hartford – below the site where NOR07 is proposed. Increased areas of tarmac and concrete will magnify this problem. ● A development of 440 houses would easily equate to over 800 cars - and Eaton Lane could not cope with this volume of traffic ● Eaton Lane (post cattle grid) is home to a ground works business, a working farm and a small residential site plus a Caravan Club recognised Camp site. These businesses would be severely impacted by any housing development ● NORO7 has been identified by Cadent as a proposed route for a future Hydrogen pipeline. This introduces a significant future infrastructure constraint and raises potential safety and planning concerns. The presence of such a pipeline would almost certainly reduce the developable area and adds a further layer of risk that has not been adequately accounted for in the site assessment process ● Eaton Lane -the actual farm land is considered to be in the top 10 in the UK re it’s condition for growing crops. It is currently used to grow crops such as Maze & Cheshire new potatoes ● The Land is also home to numerous butterflies, bees, foxes, wood pigeons, buzzards and Bats, (we believe there could be a Roost in the trees near to the railway line) There is also Owls are nesting there and there are multiple Badger sets (which are now protected by the current Government) ● Cheshire Wildlife Trust are also in the process of identifying more wildlife corridors and Vale Royal Locks and the surrounding fields are in scope for this! We are aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village.  These include a current pre application submitted by Stonhams for a reasonably sized development and village Community centre on land adjoining Butchers Stile. We are also aware of Tatton Estate’s plans to develop the Hamlet of Bostock, opposite the Hayhurst Arms i.e Bostock Green. These two developments, if included in the Local plan would collectively add circa 200 dwellings to the Parish. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 6076

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Tim O'Keeffe

I&O_6465
Yes. Severe highways congestion, poor public transport accessibility, and existing strain on schools, health facilities, and utilities should be recognised as constraints. NOR01 does not provide realistic solutions to these issues and would exacerbate them.

Comment

Representation ID: 6220

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Nolan

I&O_6618
Consideration needs to be given to, Upscaling of the local amenties, amny of the houses in the area were build in the 70's and before, have looped systems so cannot sustain EV charges, heatpumps etc. Upscaling of local highway infastructure, roads designed for the 70's, single lane bridge to cross the river between Winington and Barnton is not good enough. Condition of roads, poor maintainnance and upkeep, roads around greenbelts are single lane, deisgned and used for farming equipment such as tractors. Lack of access to medical faciliates, lack of access to primary, secondary and further edictaion in Northwich area. Despite investment in Northwich lack of ability to bring in trade/services/retail and leisure as one third of the town is moderna nd the rst falling to oieces (literally). Once all those things are remedied lets build some more houses that people want/need and i an area we can invest in.

Comment

Representation ID: 6238

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sue White

SS31
I&O_6636
NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 6323

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Adrian Birchenough

SS31
I&O_6730
- NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 6392

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Stuart Lea-Swain

I&O_6805
The natural geography of the river crossings available for the Weaver are Northwich town, Winnington and Acton Bridge A49. All these locations are currently unable to manage rush hour traffic, making the proposed developments unworkable.

Comment

Representation ID: 6538

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Philip Marshall

I&O_6955
Yes – Northwich faces significant constraints that must be addressed before further growth is planned. The single-lane Winnington Bridge is a critical bottleneck and there is no funded replacement, while existing schools, GP surgeries and roads are already under pressure. Major projects such as the Hynet pipeline and the Winnington Solar scheme will add years of disruption and heavy HGV traffic. These factors, combined with the risk of coalescence of surrounding villages, mean infrastructure delivery must come first before any additional allocations are made.

Comment

Representation ID: 6731

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Tim Parr

I&O_7154
NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and is a designated Conservation Area. The scale of the proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued not just by the village community but the wider Northwich community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting. Previous developments over the last 30 years have already changed the village and it’s surroundings significantly. Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,   particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from very heavy congestion, and further development would significantly exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Traffic noise is already a significant issue for residents adjacent to the A556. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services.   The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. There is a history of flooding issues at various points in and around Davenham. A particular concern is the issue mentioned in Q29 - the environmental, climate and biodiversity impact of continuing to develop out along both sides of the Weaver, further reducing the green corridor that is a significant benefit to the area, and impacting on the distinctive character of the Weaver Valley. The value and importance of preserving these green corridors can be seen in the Mersey Forest Plan and through Cheshire Wildlife Trust’s nature reserve work in this area. Some of these woodlands and reserves are now under more pressure than ever before, as large developments encroach right up to the boundaries of this important environment. I understand the need for the area to contribute to the plan and are aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are better aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting.   For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.  

Comment

Representation ID: 6779

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Karen Lea-Swain

I&O_7206
The highway design around Northwich does not support largesacle housing development and the related increase in vehicualar traffic. There are currently long queues and constant traffic congestion at the bridge points at Bartington/Barnton and Winnington. Any increase in population within the area needs to consider the extra vehicular traffic requirements. The current queues on the A49 as the main access route to motorways back up from the A49/A533 junction to the Cuddington A49/A566 junction every morning between 7-9am. This creates a wait time of at least 30 mins currently and will only increase with further households. This is due to the lack of public transport to effectively carry people to places of work/education during this time period. Whilst the congestion is more staggered during the evening rush hour the lights at the A49/A533 still back up to Higher Whitley on weekdays.

Comment

Representation ID: 7183

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: David Lees

I&O_7658
I think  we  need  more  schools, dentists  and  doctors  in the  northwich  area  before  any housing  is approved 

Comment

Representation ID: 7194

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Lucy Coles

Map 5.6
I&O_7672
Infrastructure including roads and bridges, health services and schools, particularly SEN provision, will all present a significant challenge with the scale of development outlined - the quantity of housing is out of proportion to the existing infrastructure and services. A particular concern is the level of congestion on London Road, Chester Road, Castle Street and Manchester Road at peak times, which impedes access to the town centre and local services. With reference to map areas NOR06 and NOR07 - Davenham East and Davenham West: 1) The current CWAC local plan commits to protecting the character of a village - the proposed number of dwellings would more than double the size of Davenham, which would fundamentally alter the character of the village and is disproportional to the village's size and setting. Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identiy and a designated Conservation Area (in the centre of NOR06) 2) The current CWAC local plan commits to promoting wellbeing - the proposed loss of green spaces and footpaths in the village of Davenham would degrade access to nature and spaces for exercise, negativly affecting wellbeing for village residents. The impact on current residents' access to infrasctructure (see point 4 below) and the increase in traffic congestion would also negatively impact on wellbeing. 3) The current CWAC local plan commits to only considering prime farmland in exceptional circumstances - both NOR06 and NOR07 are considered prime farmland and no clear case has been made for exceptional circumstances. The proposed development areas also include spaces where there are ancient trees and a diversity of plant and animal wildlife. 4) The current CWAC local plan commits to ensuring there is appropriate infrasctructure - at peak times routes into or through Davenham on Hartford Road and London Road are already very congested. In addition, there are limited bus services in the village and access to trains requires a car or bus journey. Also, there are no health services in the village and while there are shops, there is very limited parking to access them. Thus if the number of dwellings in the village is more than doubled, new residents will be impacted by this limited infrastructure and existing residents will have their use of existing infrastructure degraded. A more proportionate development of the village of Davenham could contribute to the local area's housing needs without fundamentally altering the character of the village. For example the current pre-application submitted by Stonhams for land adjacent to Butchers Stile and Tatton Estate's plans to develop the Hamlet of Bostock. 

Comment

Representation ID: 7218

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Nik Darwin

I&O_7698
Infrastructure constraints include the various river bridges including Winnington  to Barnton. Town centre traffic capacity. Town centre flooding. Need to traffic control on A556 at roundabouts to cope with additional traffic. Understanding of powers and water supply issues caused by increased housing anf employment. 

Comment

Representation ID: 7391

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Councillor Mark Stocks

I&O_7871
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED

Comment

Representation ID: 7396

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Councillor Lynn Stocks

I&O_7876
Outlying areas of Northwich Town centre do not have the same infrastructure, i.e. transport, doctors etc and I consider it to be vital that this is addressed before the possibility of more housing.

Comment

Representation ID: 7579

Received: 22/08/2025

Respondent: Pinpoint Group

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_8066
NOR06 – A556 and London Road traffic Davenham are already very heavy following the recent large developments in Winsford and Moulton together with developments in Davenham at Fountain Lane, Green Lane, Church Street. The safety of the travellers at the caravan site at the end of London Road must also be considered. The land identified for NOR06 is a busy working farm and in the same family for generations. The farm is part of village life with its local farm shop produce and farm animals, all supporting a community spirit and contributing to mental well being. It has a rare breed programme as well as promoting local tourism with its Caravan Club approved site. It is also one of the last remaining Cheshire farms with its farmhouse at the centre of its land. Development of these key fields would possibly tip the farm into no longer being commercially viable. NOR06 farm land is crossed by public footpaths used heavily by walkers before, during and since Covid as a de-stress from daily life and as a boost to mental health. The designated fields support an abundance of wildlife which would be lost to development including various birds of prey, hares and owls. Mere Bank has that name for a reason. NOR06 has areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. The proposed development would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the local Davenham community. The proposed area would encroach on the designated conservation area and also obscure the landmark of St Wilfred’s Parish Church. Despite developments over recent years the additional 1305 houses of NOR06 and NOR07 now proposed are entirely disproportionate to Davenham village size and infrastructure which on a day to day basis is already operating at or near capacity. The village road network and bypass, suffer from heavy congestion which further development would only exacerbate. There are already concerns regarding traffic, air quality, and safety. This is before the Lostock Gralam incinerator becomes operational and the true effects on the local atmosphere are felt. There have been a number of recent planning applications which may be more aligned with the scale and character of the village. The old Davenham Dairy with land running alongside the A556, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 7755

Received: 23/08/2025

Respondent: Wendy Mahon

Map 5.6
I&O_8242
We have ONE Doctors Surgery and One Dentist! Patients already struggle to get an appointment. School parking is also a big problem. Therefore I am totally against more families coming to our ‘village’!

Support

Representation ID: 7792

Received: 24/08/2025

Respondent: Martin Dignum

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_8280
NOR06 - NOR07   Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 7842

Received: 24/08/2025

Respondent: Helen Armstrong

I&O_8331
- NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village,  practically doubling the number of residences and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan. I'd be most grateful if you would take my strong views on the above issues into account when considering the Local Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 7876

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_8365
The options for Northwich all have something wrong with them; for instance: NOR1 at Barnton/Anderton feels as though it would need a strategic link road to service it NOR2 at Wincham suffers from poor accessibility and would lead to a remote and detached location without community infrastructure support NOR10, 11 and 12 at Weaverham may offer the best fit but this is less an expansion of Northwich and more about the re-definition of Weaverham without supporting infrastructure NOR6 will change the character of Davenham, whilst not benefitting from great access NOR7, 8 and 9 may offer the best option for Northwich (aka Hartford)

Comment

Representation ID: 7912

Received: 24/08/2025

Respondent: Deborah Dignum

SS31
I&O_8401
NOR06 - NOR07    Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting.

Comment

Representation ID: 8087

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: M & S Lacey

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_8576
The options for Northwich all have something wrong with them; for instance: NOR1 at Barnton/Anderton feels as though it would need a strategic link road to service it NOR2 at Wincham suffers from poor accessibility and would lead to a remote and detached location without community infrastructure support NOR10, 11 and 12 at Weaverham may offer the best fit but this is less an expansion of Northwich and more about the re-definition of Weaverham without supporting infrastructure NOR6 will change the character of Davenham, whilst not benefitting from great access NOR7, 8 and 9 may offer the best option for Northwich (aka Hartford)

Comment

Representation ID: 8111

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Mark Powell

SS 31
I&O_8600
Northwich  It is a real positive to see the expansion of the Victoria Infirmary, but the town still suffers from a shortage of Doctors Dentists, Teachers - especially SEN and of course from an emergency services perspective the ever reducing fire service vis a vis more housing to provide cover for   London Road, Chester Road Castle Street, Manchester Road - at peak times and Saturdays these roads are operating at capacity and many residents living on the outskirts will not travel into the town centre because of the traffic queues into town!! Highways need to consider park & ride (plus see our comments re NOR10 - Weaverham   Davenham  CWACs Local plan states that they will continue to:- Protect the character of a village: allowing developers to double the size of Davenham is at odds with this Promote wellbeing: these proposals would allow development on much used green spaces  Only consider Prime farmland in exceptional circumstances - Both NOR06 & NOR07 are both considered to be prime farmland  Ensure there is appropriate infrastructure! Roads at capacity, Buses infrequent and availability not conducive to regular use. Trains require users to drive to all nearby stations - car parking is costly and limited  - NOR06 - NOR07  Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. There is no Doctors or Dentists surgery in the village and the primary school is operating at capacity. The bus service is limited and there is no access to a railway station without driving at least 15 mins to Hartford, Northwich or Plumley - NOR06 - Land to the rear of Church Street and London Road  Lack of adequate infrastructure is already known to CWAC Highways. This area would require access via two of the three busiest streets in the village! These roads operate at capacity at peak times  A known and designated conservation area is situated in the centre of NOR06 NOR06 is home to two working farms and both of these landowners (either side of the Conservation area) have publicly stated they have no intention of selling their farms  We are aware of a 72 Bed Dementia care nursing home currently working its way through the planning process - When approved, it will take land in NOR06 and increase traffic via staff visitors and suppliers  There is a long established footpath here that would need to be protected A large sewage pipe runs across this land The land falls steeply down to Elderbriar brook.  This would be overwhelmed with substantial surface water.  It feeds into the River Dane near the old stone bridge and this area has seen a broad area of flooded farmland in recent years. The area is known for its diverse fauna and flora with ancient trees that are home to a variety of birds The grass areas are homes to foxes hedgehogs bees etc and should be protected under existing wildlife and conservation requirements/regulations NOR07 - Land off Eaton lane - currently down a single track lane  Another Infrastructure hotspot known to CWAC Highways, as all current traffic from Eaton Lane, Eaton Crescent & Pritchard Drive, have to use Hartford road (The third known busiest road in the village) to access the A556 There has been serious flooding around the junction of Eaton Land and Hartford – below the site where NOR07 is proposed. Increased areas of tarmac and concrete will magnify this problem.    Access, a development of 440 houses would easily equate to over 800 cars - and Eaton Lane could not cope with this volume of traffic   Eaton Lane (post cattle grid) is home to a ground works business, a working farm and a small residential site plus a Caravan Club recognised Camp site. These businesses would be severely impacted by any housing development NORO7 has been identified by Cadent as a proposed route for a future Hydrogen pipeline. This introduces a significant future infrastructure constraint and raises potential safety and planning concerns. The presence of such a pipeline would almost certainly reduce the developable area and adds a further layer of risk that has not been adequately accounted for in the site assessment process Eaton Lane -the actual farm land is considered to be in the top 10 in the UK re it’s condition for growing crops. It is currently used to grow crops such as Maze & Cheshire new potatoes  The Land is also home to numerous butterflies, bees, foxes, wood pigeons, buzzards and Bats, (we believe there could be a Roost in the trees near to the railway line) There is also Owls are nesting there and there are multiple Badger sets (which are now protected by the current Government) Cheshire Wildlife Trust are also in the process of identifying more wildlife corridors and Vale Royal Locks and the surrounding fields are in scope for this!  I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village.  These include a current pre application submitted by Stonhams for a reasonably sized development and village Community centre on land adjoining Butchers Stile  We are also aware of Tatton Estate’s plans to develop the Hamlet of Bostock, opposite the Hayhurst Arms i.e Bostock Green. These two developments, if included in the Local plan would collectively add circa 200 dwellings to the Parish  These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 8124

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Powell

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_8613
It is a real positive to see the expansion of the Victoria Infirmary, but the town still suffers from a shortage of Doctors Dentists, Teachers - especially SEN and of course from an emergency services perspective the ever reducing fire service vis a vis more housing to provide cover for London Road, Chester Road Castle Street, Manchester Road - at peak times and Saturdays these roads are operating at capacity and many residents living on the outskirts will not travel into the town centre because of the traffic queues into town!! Highways need to consider park & ride (plus see my comments re NOR10 - Weaverham). Davenham  CWACs Local plan states that they will continue to:- Protect the character of a village: allowing developers to double the size of Davenham is at odds with this Promote wellbeing: these proposals would allow development on green spaces  Only consider Prime farmland in exceptional circumstances - Both NOR06 & NOR07 are both considered to be prime farmland  Ensure there is appropriate infrastructure! Roads at capacity, Buses infrequent and availability not conducive to regular use. Trains require users to drive to all nearby stations - car parking is costly and limited  - NOR06 - NOR07  Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. There is no Doctors or Dentists surgery in the village and the primary school is operating at capacity. The bus service is limited and there is no access to a railway station without driving at least 15 mins to Hartford, Northwich or Plumley   - NOR06 - Land to the rear of Church Street and London Road  Lack of adequate infrastructure is already known to CWAC Highways. This area would require access via two of the three busiest streets in the village! These roads operate at capacity at peak times  A known and designated conservation area is situated in the centre of NOR06 NOR06 is home to two working farms and both of these landowners (either side of the Conservation area) have publicly stated they have no intention of selling their farms  We are aware of a 72 Bed Dementia care nursing home currently working its way through the planning process - When approved, it will take land in NOR06 and increase traffic via staff visitors and suppliers  There is a long established footpath here that would need to be protected A large sewage pipe runs across this land The land falls steeply down to Elderbriar brook.  This would be overwhelmed with substantial surface water.  It feeds into the River Dane near the old stone bridge and this area has seen a broad area of flooded farmland in recent years. The area is known for its diverse fauna and flora with ancient trees that are home to a variety of birds The grass areas are homes to foxes hedgehogs bees etc and should be protected under existing wildlife and conservation requirements/regulations - NOR07 - Land off Eaton lane - currently down a single track lane   Another Infrastructure hotspot known to CWAC Highways, as all current traffic from Eaton Lane, Eaton Crescent & Pritchard Drive, have to use Hartford road (The third known busiest road in the village) to access the A556 There has been serious flooding around the junction of Eaton Land and Hartford – below the site where NOR07 is proposed. Increased areas of tarmac and concrete will magnify this problem.  Access, a development of 440 houses would easily equate to over 800 cars - and Eaton Lane could not cope with this volume of traffic Eaton Lane (post cattle grid) is home to a ground works business, a working farm and a small residential site plus a Caravan Club recognised Camp site. These businesses would be severely impacted by any housing development  NORO7 has been identified by Cadent as a proposed route for a future Hydrogen pipeline. This introduces a significant future infrastructure constraint and raises potential safety and planning concerns. The presence of such a pipeline would almost certainly reduce the developable area and adds a further layer of risk that has not been adequately accounted for in the site assessment process Eaton Lane Farm - the actual farm land is considered to be in the top 10 in the UK re it’s condition for growing crops. It is currently used to grow crops such as Maze & Cheshire new potatoes  The Land is also home to numerous butterflies, bees, foxes, wood pigeons, buzzards and Bats, (we believe there could be a Roost in the trees near to the railway line) There is also Owls are nesting there and there are multiple Badger sets (which are now protected by the current Government) Cheshire Wildlife Trust are also in the process of identifying more wildlife corridors and Vale Royal Locks and the surrounding fields are in scope for this!    I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village.  These include a current pre application submitted by Stonhams for a reasonably sized development and village Community centre on land adjoining Butchers Stile  We are also aware of Tatton Estate’s plans to develop the Hamlet of Bostock, opposite the Hayhurst Arms i.e Bostock Green. These two developments, if included in the Local plan would collectively add circa 200 dwellings to the Parish  These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 8178

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Nick & Margy Hodges

SS31
I&O_8667
NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting   Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services.   The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives.   I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting.   For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.   We would also like to point out that NOR06 & NOR07 include sustainable working Farms producing food within a climate of cost-of-living increases driven particularly by rising food prices.  Developing on this land appears to go against the CWAC stated Strategic Polices, e.g. SO3 and wider economic interests in maintaining the food supply etc.:   SO3   In rural areas, support farming, agriculture and diversification of the rural economy whilst ensuring development is of an appropriate scale and character.  

Comment

Representation ID: 8195

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Robin Mackenzie

SS31
I&O_8684
Yes, NOR07 is wholly unsuitable for such proposed development on a number of grounds. Flooding: The area is prone to surface flooding (easily visible on public flood maps) and development would almost certainly lead to further village flooding with particular risk to the junction of Eaton lane and Hartford Road which has historically flooded and left residents out of there homes for 6+ months Community warnings of development in Moulton that would create flooding risks in the area were ignored,  and flooding occurred in 2022 A CWAC report documents this https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/asset-library/flooding/s19-daveham-report.pdf Ecology: NOR07 is designated prime agricultural land surrounded by designated irreplaceable ancient woodland . STRAT 1 emphasises the importance of minimising the loss of high-grade agricultural land, particularly BMV (Best and most versatile) As mentioned, the land is surrounded on all sides by officially designated irreplaceable ancient woodland, also a river body (The Weaver) and ancient hedgerow. I hope you note that the ancient woodland that extends from Eaton Lane to the side of NOR07 then over the The River Weaver and into the proposed NOR8, is the longest corridor of ancient woodland in CWAC . This makes it and the surrounding area especially unique and important above its already listed status. These corridors and the surrounding open space around them are symbiotic , and are widely acknowledged in all modern ecology studies to be the most important. As modern ecologists know, these open spaces adjacent to protected ancient woodland environments provide the travel corridors and hunting ground for countless protected species in an ancient woodland setting. These would be significantly (and arguably criminally) impacted by such development. The ecosystem does not contain itself to the woodland itself, rather it relies also on the spaces around it. I am happy to provide references and studies on this. I am also personally aware of multiple bat species and nesting barn owls that use NOR07 specifically as their primary hunting and feeding area. Given the length of the ancient woodland corridor, the water body, and the meadows, the entire area (NOR07, Vale Royal Locks, NOR08) is a truly unique habitat that should be investigated for SSSI status. It is a jewel in the CWAC landscape. Development in the area is totally misinformed and ecologically vandalistic, going against all government guidance and policy on ecology. Access The aforementioned boundaries of NOR07, the protected ancient woodland, River Weaver and hedgerow, mean that NOR07 is inaccessible in any practical way without unlawful damage to the habitat. Eaton Lane would provide the only access point without penetrating the ancient woodland, the alternative is building a bridge over the weaver through other ancient woodland which you would agree is not feasible. Eaton Lane is a small and narrow form of ‘cul-de-sac’ with some limited bridleway traffic to the farm and one other small rural property, wholly unsuitable for high traffic and already at capacity. And yet, I do not see another way into NOR07 without damaging the ancient woodland and surrounding habitat Hartford Road (the only access to Eaton Lane) has already been flagged as unsuitable for high flow construction HGVs due to risk of road collapse . This has been widely documented in HyNet consultations with the community Further to this, some of the proposed HYNet stations are proposed on NOR07. Should HyNet proceed in the area, this would put a hydrogen pipeline under a proposed development which raises many new concerns of safety and planning practicality. Community: I would encourage anyone to visit the bridleway alongside NOR07 on foot rather than google maps. It is immediately clear why this is the community recreational area for the entire village. Dog walkers, pram pushers, runners, the elderly. This is their life line to better physical and mental health . Disturbing this would cut off this life line for the entire community across generations . With the addition of other proposed developments the village would change beyond recognition, multiple dimensions of health would suffer, which again is against policy to keep unique villages (such as Davenham) intact of their character and protect community health and wellbeing. Davenham is its own historic parish village, the threat to the village of being considered under Northwich rather than its own identity was laid out most recently in 2014 https://consult.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/file/3186591 . This should be taken into consideration that the community here has been historically ignored on matters of village and parish identity. Should construction occur, the blight put on property and young families from reduced air quality due to extensive building works would be another major concern and this impact would especially be felt in village children (as their lungs are still developing). Davenham and its single primary school is a village of families playing in the street. In addition to NOR07, NOR06 and NOR08 are similarly affected by the above concerns with particular respect to the preservation of the village around the historic parish church (NOR06) and the preservation of ancient woodland habitat and its surroundings (NOR08). Additionally, the owner of NOR06 has not consented to sale or alternative use of the land, this was made explicitly clear in a local community gathering on the proposed Local Plan . It is a family farm that is not up for sale and they are extremely upset that the land is in the plan without prior consultation, as this now places an administrative burden on them that was avoidable and unnecessary should prior outreach have occurred.

Comment

Representation ID: 8258

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Christopher and Marie Lawton

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_8747
NOR06 AND NOR07; The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village's size and setting, particularly bearing in mind our strong sense of identity and being designated a Conservation Area. Public transport is sparse, and infrequent, which results in people having to use their cars. Having additional vehicles on the local roads, will result in further congestion. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding, and any further development would result in further issues to local watercourses. There would be a greater loss of greenfield land and biodiversity, contrary to sustainable objectives. The proposed developments by Wain Homes and that of a small development in Bostock is more suited to the infrastructure and size of our village.  For these reasons, we ask that CWAC Council reconsider the proposed development applications within our parish.  We request that all current proposals for large scale residential development in Davenham be removed or scaled significantly back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 8262

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: M and P Jones

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_8751
The options for Northwich all have something wrong with them; for instance: NOR1 at Barnton/Anderton feels as though it would need a strategic link road to service it NOR2 at Wincham suffers from poor accessibility and would lead to a remote and detached location without community infrastructure support NOR10, 11 and 12 at Weaverham may offer the best fit but this is less an expansion of Northwich and more about the re-definition of Weaverham without supporting infrastructure NOR6 will change the character of Davenham, whilst not benefitting from great access NOR7, 8 and 9 may offer the best option for Northwich (aka Hartford)

Comment

Representation ID: 8286

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Victoria Gardner

NOR06 NOR07
I&O_8775
Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the local community. For instance there is an ancient requirement for St Wilfrid's Church on Church Street to be visible from Davenham Hall. There is also a public footpath from the church across the farmland on NOR06 which is used daily by local residents. There is a plethora of wildlife and biodiversity across this farmland from foxes, hares, owls, birds of prey, bats, ducks and several increasingly rare bird species, to name but a few. This farmland at the Church Street end of NOR06 and bordered by A533 currently owned by Davenham Hall, is actively being farmed and produces 4 large crops of sileage a year, contributing to sustainability objectives. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village's size and setting. Davenham's existing infrastructure is already operating at capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, London Road and Church Street, suffer from heavy congestion and traffic hold ups. The narrow roads in the village with no public parking facilities, were simply not designed for the amount of traffic there is now, let alone with more residents. More residents will mean more cars as the public transport system is absolutely minimal. Commuting to major areas of employment, education, etc are virtually impossible without cars. There are no doctors or dentistry services locally either. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run off and impact local watercourses.   Surely the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed use housing development should be considered along with the further development of Winnington Village.  As a long standing local resident of Davenham, I strongly object to these proposals and urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for residential development in Davenham be removed in the final local plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 8355

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: William Coverdale

SS31
I&O_8846
Please find below my comments / objections on the proposal Cheshire West and Chester Local Plan specifically to Davenham.  In summary:  - Contrary to highway safety - Contrary to stated policy - Detrimental to public interest - Lack of services/utilities - Other or non-specific reason In Detail: - NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, Jack Lane and London Road suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. There is already a problem with lack of parking spaces for the local shops where there is regular congestion. Pedestrians often take their life in their hands as they cross London Road, when often visibility is limited over the parked cars for a good view of oncoming cars.  Growth in development in the our rural village, over the past few years is gradually eroding the fields that borders it. The new builds will have a detrimental impact upon the character of Davenham, which seems to go against the 'Vision' of CWAC "By 2030 Cheshire West and Chester will be a desirable and attractive place to live , work, learn with vibrant towns and rural villages, reflecting the vision of the Sustainable Community Strategy......conserving, managing and enhancing the valuable natural and historical environments." How is it possible to allow other new housing estate to be built on the greenfields of Davenham and still conserve and enhance its valuable natural environment? The open fields that remain contribute hugely to the character of the village. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local plan. There is concern that there is a lack of infrastructure, the doctors surgeries, dentists and schools are already under pressure. Old and established trees and hedges will be lost to the new developments. These form an important part to the local eco system, absorbing CO2 and take up of ground water. Air quality will suffer and as well as adding to the risk of flooding. To meet housing needs, all brownfield sites in the Northwich urban area should be developed before any greenfield sites. The development of brownfield sites would 'conserve, manage and enhance the valuable natural and historical environments' and would benefit all communities. Greenfield sites should only be used as a last resort, once they are built on they are lost forever. These are all points which CWAC was presumed to protect when it agreed with the Davenham and Whatcroft Neighbourhood Plan. I would hope that CWAC will take my views into consideration. I strongly oppose any plans of development within Davenham as anymore traffic and loss of environment will remove the integrity of the village completely. The wellbeing through lack of walking and cycling routes for those who already live within the village, could suffer as they see the beautiful country side devoured under the heavy building machinery and eventually another housing estate