Comment

Representation ID: 785

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Dave Bell

I&O_889
Understructure in the area is not sustainable for anymore growth

Comment

Representation ID: 808

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Janet Gormley

I&O_912
Roads are too busy at peak times now never mind with more houses bringing possibly 2 cars for each house. Not enough doctors and dentists to serve the community already. Personally I haven’t seen a doctor for over two yrs it’s always a practice nurse or assistant practitioner.  

Comment

Representation ID: 825

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Stephen Allen-Gurr

I&O_929
Need to take the A556 over Kingsmead roundabout which would alleviate congestion in Davenham. Traffic lights on Davenham bypass at junction for Moulton. A new bridge at Winnington.  

Comment

Representation ID: 843

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Andrew Oliver

I&O_947
Schools, FE colleges, sports facilities and health care should be a priority.

Comment

Representation ID: 865

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Debbie Bennett

I&O_969
Chester/Manchester train line needs beefing up. Only one train an hour atm.

Comment

Representation ID: 882

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Angela Capstick

I&O_986
Improvements to health care provision, education (particularly primary & secondary).

Comment

Representation ID: 890

Received: 05/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Dale

I&O_994
Highway infrastructure is limited by crossing points over the river Weaver within the town centre and at Winnington Swing Bridge. The road through the centre of Weaverham has a narrow bend shortly before the petrol station and shops and is a long length of 30 mph controlled road. Could some improvement be acheived by bypassing Weaverham with a new road off the A49 roundabout, running along the disused railway line towards Winnington? The Doctors Surgery is totally over subscribed and it can take weeks to obtain a face to face appointment with a Doctor. If the size of the village is to be increased health services need to be improved.

Comment

Representation ID: 899

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Jill Darlington

I&O_1003
NOR 06 and 07 would negatively impact the education of children and the environment of the local river 

Comment

Representation ID: 915

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Allan Aston

I&O_1019
Roads, transport, traffic, schools, doctors

Comment

Representation ID: 929

Received: 31/07/2025

Respondent: Vicky Goodall

I&O_1033
Must ensure there are enough schools, doctors, shops and public transport to cater for all new houses built.

Comment

Representation ID: 941

Received: 31/08/2025

Respondent: Dee Rowan

I&O_1045
See above

Comment

Representation ID: 1013

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Christian

I&O_1118
Rail services are shocking

Comment

Representation ID: 1027

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Mark Metcalfe

I&O_1132
Brownfield sites need to be considered as all the areas so far are greenfield. Land that was previously earmarked for HS2 should be looked at as well, as some of this was already purchased by the government and therefore was earmarked for previous development.

Comment

Representation ID: 1058

Received: 06/08/2025

Respondent: Suzanne Turner

I&O_1163

Comment

Representation ID: 1069

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Jenny Day

I&O_1174
Better roads, more shops, schools and Dr's should be in place BEFORE houses are built and more people move to the area. It will also help encourage more people to move to the area if all these things are already in place.

Comment

Representation ID: 1216

Received: 01/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Milnes

I&O_1321
Northwich infrastructure - Roads, especially at pinch points eg: the centre of Northwich, swing bridges.  

Comment

Representation ID: 1227

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Jennifer Hart

I&O_1332
I perceive many constraints that make areas NOR06 and NOR07 unsuitable as areas for growth. Davenham is a historic village including a designated Conservation Area and a strong community that values and passionately upholds a village identity. Development in NOR06 and NOR07 would forcibly change Davenham from a village to a town or mega-village, dramatically altering the settlement's identity and character. The village does not have infrastructure to cope with significant expansion. The traffic congestion and parking problems are already significant. Public transport provision is minimal. I have also heard concerns about sewage and overflows. I would also have concerns about flooding - I perceive that NOR06 and NOR07 include large areas that serve to mitigate flood risk in the existing village of Davenham. Furthermore, I am keenly aware that the NOR06 and NOR07 areas include, or are adjacent to, extremely well used countryside walking/running/cycling routes that support the physical and mental health of the local population. I have no doubt that loss of these much loved countryside spaces and their views would damage people's health in the area for years to come. 

Comment

Representation ID: 1466

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Sara Summers Muir

I&O_1571
Key constraints: local NHS capacity (GP/dental), existing school capacity, local road congestion and road safety, flood risk/drainage, and biodiversity loss. These constraints should be resolved and funded prior to any land allocation.  

Comment

Representation ID: 1515

Received: 06/08/2025

Respondent: Victoria Glover

I&O_1623
Schools, doctors, dentists, and public services such as police force and fire are already stretched. If building houses, we need a solid infrastructure able to support the expansion comfortably.

Comment

Representation ID: 1538

Received: 06/08/2025

Respondent: Matt Aubrey

I&O_1646
Any increase in housing MUST come with additional services including schools transport and health provision

Comment

Representation ID: 1558

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Majella Davies

I&O_1666
As a resident of Davenham Village I feel I need to give my opinion and concerns over the proposed development of Northwich & surrounding area's. I feel the impact of all these houses in Davenham and Bostock is huge in relation to traffic,schools and the environment.   There is very little capacity in the schools in Davenham, Moulton & Leftwich at present and it is the same with the colleges i.e John Deanes and at Winsford. The problem with Davenham is the transport limitations, the village gets really busy already so any extra traffic to the village would be just terrible. Also there are no train stations in the village and the nearest one is several miles away and also the bus service to Winsford & Crewe is hourly but goes the long way around so not really suitable for those who would commute to work. There are no surgeries or dentists in Davenham and therefore any new residents would have to travel to Northwich , Winsford or Kingsmead which would increase the number of car journey's and the surgeries could not cope with the demand. There is alot of high grade farmland, two rivers and substantial  area's of broadleaf woodland. The proposed development would take away valuable agricultural land. The village of Davenham & Church Street conservation area's would be harmed by large new developments. Davenham village is already operating at or near capacity.   The road network especially A556, Hartford Rd and London Road suffer heavy congestion already & further development woukd exacerbate traffic, air quality & safety concerns which is very worrying. Public transport provision at present is minimal and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on the limited local bus service.

Comment

Representation ID: 1565

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Robina Gration

I&O_1673
NOR06, NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of Identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of the development proposed is entirely dis proportionate to the villages’ size and setting. Davenhams’ existing infrastructure, Hartford Road and London Road suffers from heavy congestion. Further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal and additional residents and cars would place unsustainable pressure on the limited local bus service. The sites identified includes areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run off and impact local water courses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainable objectives. The CWAC local plan proposes major developments in and to the South of Northwich for just over 5000 dwellings. There would also be significant urban extensions to the South / West of Winsford of more than 11,000 dwellings. Thes will have direct impact on Davenham and Bostock. Existing problems in Davenham with regards to traffic, services and the environment would be exacerbated. Schools, Nurseries, Colleges. There is very little spare capacity in the schools in Davenham, Moulton and Leftwich. The colleges, Sir John Deans Kingsmead and Winsford College inevitably could see an increase in students. Transport. The great disadvantage of Davenham that is not recognised in the new plan is the transport limitations. There are already frequent traffic tailbacks into the village from the A556 roundabout. The Northwich trains to Manchester are not frequent. There is an hourly bus service to Winsford and Crewe, but the route is very circuitous and not suitable for commuter use. Green belt, Agricultural, Flood risk. The developments will take valuable agricultural land. The land South of Northwich is not part of the Green Belt but is largely high grade farmland, two river valleys and substantial areas of broadleaf woodland. Two years ago there was flooding around the River Dane. There has also been flooding around Eaton Lane and Hartford Road due to New house building interference with the water course at the rear of London Road. Medical Services. There are no Doctors surgeries or Dentists in Davenham, New residents would have to travel to Winsford, Northwich, Kingsmead which again increases the number of car journeys. I am aware of the planning applications and interest of developers more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre application from Stonhams and a small development at Bostock Green, collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenhams’ capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the Parish. I request that all current proposals for large scale residential developments in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 1568

Received: 07/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Keith Gration

I&O_1676
NOR06, NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of Identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of the development proposed is entirely dis proportionate to the villages’ size and setting. Davenhams’ existing infrastructure, Hartford Road and London Road suffers from heavy congestion. Further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal and additional residents and cars would place unsustainable pressure on the limited local bus service. The sites identified includes areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run off and impact local water courses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainable objectives. The CWAC local plan proposes major developments in and to the South of Northwich for just over 5000 dwellings. There would also be significant urban extensions to the South / West of Winsford of more than 11,000 dwellings. Thes will have direct impact on Davenham and Bostock. Existing problems in Davenham with regards to traffic, services and the environment would be exacerbated. Schools, Nurseries, Colleges. There is very little spare capacity in the schools in Davenham, Moulton and Leftwich. The colleges, Sir John Deans Kingsmead and Winsford College inevitably could see an increase in students. Transport. The great disadvantage of Davenham that is not recognised in the new plan is the transport limitations. There are already frequent traffic tailbacks into the village from the A556 roundabout. The Northwich trains to Manchester are not frequent. There is an hourly bus service to Winsford and Crewe, but the route is very circuitous and not suitable for commuter use. Green belt, Agricultural, Flood risk. The developments will take valuable agricultural land. The land South of Northwich is not part of the Green Belt but is largely high grade farmland, two river valleys and substantial areas of broadleaf woodland. Two years ago there was flooding around the River Dane. There has also been flooding around Eaton Lane and Hartford Road due to New house building interference with the water course at the rear of London Road. Medical Services. There are no Doctors surgeries or Dentists in Davenham, New residents would have to travel to Winsford, Northwich, Kingsmead which again increases the number of car journeys. I am aware of the planning applications and interest of developers more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre application from Stonhams and a small development at Bostock Green, collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenhams’ capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the Parish. I request that all current proposals for large scale residential developments in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 1592

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Linda Dewsbury

I&O_1702
Question 31 The Parish Council has already raised several concerns for the village which are identified in their comments.  All relative and constructive points to be taken into account. If the current housing applications whereby over 200 dwellings are proposed and if approved will increase the Davenham Parish by approximately 17% which is quite a significant amount when you consider the size of the village. As long as the infrastructure is increased, in particular utilities (sewage), it will be necessary, if due to the number of housing growth is to be achieved. There is a Pharmacist in the village but there is no Medical Centre and with a limited amount of shops and very restricted parking on the current road system. It appears that the Parish Council supports the proposed applications and in our opinion is in keeping with the government’s proposal to provide additional housing within the community. An Ancillary Comment If all other Parish Councils follow this example and agree on an acceptable % in their area then this should go a great deal further to meet the government’s aims. 

Comment

Representation ID: 1595

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Chris Woodburn

I&O_1705
Please note the below that refer specifically to the land off Eaton Lane - this area is not supported by any infrastructure or access roads, and there is little or no scope to create access direct to the main Chester Road other than using the existing Eaton Lane. That is not fit for any significant increase in housing nor should there be any compulsory purchase to facilitate access from Hill Top junction. - the existing Eaton Lane is much used by many residents for walking, cycling, running, dog walking etc. It therefore provides a significant contribution to the wellbeing of many in the village and beyond Davenham. That should not be underestimated, nor should it be impacted or ruined by development. - this side of Davenham, including Hartford Road and the entry to the village centre is at saturation point in terms of traffic already. The village centre, even with the bypass cannot cope at busy times. Significant infrastructure developments would be needed and that won’t happen or be sufficient. - included in the above is Davenham primary school, just off Hartford Road. That could not cope and such an increase in traffic would make it even more unsafe than current. - further houses of similar size and value to what exists in Davenham will NOT address the issues of housing availability for young people. Those type of houses are simply out of range to the majority of under 30s and any large numbers of affordable homes would not align with existing developments in the village. For all the above reasons, I urge CWAC to divert their plans to the areas listed above, especially the town centre that is in urgent need of life being breathed into it.  Surely a young and growing population within the town centre would benefit all of CWACs current aims for Northwich.

Comment

Representation ID: 1602

Received: 03/08/2025

Respondent: Barry Dixon

SS 31
I&O_1712
On an area wide or village wide position these are additional points for consideration. Given the increased traffic and the disruption and road widening required will CWAC require a Section 106 agreement? Such agreement would of basic necessity include: Resurfacing of roads in the area Extents. The extent of road reconstruction or full-width resurfacing will need to be, at a minimum, along the entire frontage of the site(s) including the junction of Station Road / B5144 at the Hanging Gate and the junction of B5144 / High Street. Surfacing and or reconstruction is warranted for a minimum of 40m to 50m into the linking roads. Given the potential increase in (new) local residents using existing community facilities, area-wide improvements are warranted. The Barratt development is approximately a 7% increase on the existing settlement population. A Section 106 Agreement should be secured from the developer to contribute to the improvement to amenities in the village centre covering the avenue of shops on Northwich Road, reconstruction of the frontage roads and the reconstruction of the car park to the rear, this is a private road and car park but appropriate arrangement can be reached as has been successfully done elsewhere. Additionally, a review of the condition of High Street is required to prolong its useful life (attending to condition of footways, kerbs and potholes) An area wide assessment is warranted to identify incidental measures to accommodate the potential 7% increase in dwellings. Part 1 and Part2 of the CWAC Local plan has a lot of platitudes and many reference to could, would, should, consider, etc, etc. However, there is very little care given to key issues that will affect the residents of Weaverham and the wider Northwich catchment. Specifically with regards to the needs of the community on the provision of Doctors, Nurses, Teachers, health care workers, etc there is nothing, mentioned, at least I was unable to locate any reference. There is no reference to the number of professionals in regard to Plumbers, Electricians, Joiners, Brick-Layers etc – in other words real people, the people who make a proper community work. Where has the excellent local education establishment of Mid Chesire College gone? It has been subsumed into Winsford and Warrington. No longer local to the community that it originally served. Given the increase in population of Northwich over the last 25 years the maintenance of such a valuable resource should have been an urban planning priority. Is there an estimate of the additional number of children and the requirements of school places? Are existing educational establishments sufficient to cater for the additional children or is physical construction required? Is there a budget allocated? Other than the considerations for NOR11 a similar set of considerations are required for the sites at NOR10 and NOR12. CWAC will need to be proactive to secure the best out-turn and maximum utility for the residents of Weaverham, after all we pay your wages and we expect a proper return on our investment.

Comment

Representation ID: 1675

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Roxane Gorel

I&O_1785
NOR06  Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, London Road, & Church Street suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. NOR06 - The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. A significant portion of NOR06 , particularly the non farmed fields to the North of Davenham Hall has a number of trees with TPOs and is a hive of wildlife.  Easily viewed from the public footpath, there are Bats, White Owl, many varieties of birds and Newts that nest here. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 1679

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Brian Parker

I&O_1789
NOR06  Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, London Road, & Church Street suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. NOR06 - The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. A significant portion of NOR06 , particularly the non farmed fields to the North of Davenham Hall has a number of trees with TPOs and is a hive of wildlife.  Easily viewed from the public footpath, there are Bats, White Owl, many varieties of birds and Newts that nest here. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 1682

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian & Roxane Parker

I&O_1792
NOR06   & NOR07  Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, London Road, & Church Street suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. NOR06 -  The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. A significant portion of  NOR06 , particularly the non farmed fields to the North of Davenham Hall has a number of trees with TPOs and is a hive of wildlife.  Easily viewed from the public footpath, there are Bats, White Owl, many varieties of birds and Newts that nest here.   I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting.   For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 1685

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Michael & Rowena Fildes

I&O_1795
Davenham is a rural village with its own individual identity and community spirit. These proposed developments would see an urban sprawl between Moulton, Davenham, Hartford and Northwich. It would have a detrimental effect on property prices and happy communities. Davenham is experiencing frequent traffic problems as commuters use it as a short cut from the A556 and A533. There is no accessible rail connection without a car. Buses are infrequent and only serve local areas. There is no local Doctor or Dentist. There is no car park in the village so roads are clogged with parked cars making it extremely hard for dustmen and buses. Davenham has underground water courses which have flooded in the recent past together with the risk the River Dane would pose with more built up land. Schools are at near full capacity with no room for expansion. The question of the proposed hydrogen pipeline across NOR07 and NOR08.