Comment

Representation ID: 2878

Received: 15/08/2025

Respondent: Barry Melia

I&O_3049
Davenham is a small historic Village, with a designated Conservation Area. The roads within the village are reaching capacity, when the bypass was built the volume of traffic going through dropped, however, Moulton has increased in size and traffic from there goes through the village, plus there have been housing developments in the village which have also added to the volume of traffic. We do not have a Doctors or a Dentists, a village hall, or off road parking. In addition there will be more pollution and possible flooding, as occurred in Hartford Road/ Eaton Lane when a brook overflowed. I would beg CWAC to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish and all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 2982

Received: 16/08/2025

Respondent: Susan Conboy

I&O_3156
NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village's size and setting Davenham's existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concers. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham's capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.  

Comment

Representation ID: 3045

Received: 17/08/2025

Respondent: Hannah Crabtree

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_3219
NOR06 and NOR07 – Davenham : Conflict with Local Plan objectives : The Local Plan’s strategic objectives emphasise protection of heritage, rural character, high-quality agricultural land, and sustainable patterns of development. Large-scale expansion of Davenham would undermine these objectives. Heritage and identity : Davenham is a historic village with a designated Conservation Area and valued open spaces. Large housing allocations would be disproportionate to its size, risk eroding its distinct rural setting, and potentially harm heritage assets. Infrastructure capacity : Existing road infrastructure (A556, Hartford Road, London Road) experiences significant congestion, and public transport provision is limited. Further growth would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns, contrary to the Local Plan’s sustainable transport aims. Environmental constraints : Parts of the proposed sites play a role in mitigating local flood risk, and development would increase surface water run-off, potentially impacting nearby watercourses. The areas also support biodiversity that would be lost through development, conflicting with the Local Plan’s environmental protection goals. Loss of high-grade agricultural land : The proposed development sites include areas of Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land (Grades 1–3a), which the NPPF and the Local Plan seek to protect for food production and environmental value. More proportionate alternatives : Smaller-scale proposals currently in the planning system—such as the Wain Estates application, Stonhams pre-application, and Bostock Green development—collectively around 200 dwellings, align more closely with the village’s capacity and character. These could meet local housing needs without breaching the Local Plan’s environmental and infrastructure safeguards. Conclusion We request that large-scale allocations for Davenham (NOR06 and NOR07) are removed from the final Local Plan. This would ensure the strategy remains consistent with the Plan’s own objectives, protects high-quality agricultural land, maintains the historic character of the village, and directs growth to locations with greater capacity for sustainable development.

Comment

Representation ID: 3054

Received: 17/08/2025

Respondent: Anna Daws

NOR06
I&O_3228
As a current NHS employee working in central Northwich GP practice I can confirm that there is already significant pressure on GP appointments resulting in many residents of Davenham unable to see a health professional when they need it. This in turn affects our local Hospital A and E departments as people become more unwell and seek help there. There simply isn't the NHS infrastructure to care adequately for an additional few thousand residents on top of an already stretched local primary care service, and no government plan to provide additional services. Davenham village will be very much degraded with the addition of more traffic, noise and air pollution which will affect public health in the long term. Thus putting further pressure on NHS service locally.

Comment

Representation ID: 3066

Received: 17/08/2025

Respondent: Maggie Smock

NOR06/NOR07
I&O_3240
Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the local community. For instance there is an ancient requirement for St Wilfrid's Church on Church Street to be visible from Davenham Hall. There is also a public footpath from the church across the farmland on NOR06 which is used daily by local residents. There is a plethora of wildlife and biodiversity across this farmland from foxes, hares, owls, birds of prey, bats, ducks and several increasingly rare bird species, to name but a few. This farmland at the Church Street end of NOR06 and bordered by A533 currently owned by Davenham Hall, is actively being farmed and produces 4 large crops of sileage a year, contributing to sustainability objectives. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village's size and setting. Davenham's existing infrastructure is already operating at capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, London Road and Church Street, suffer from heavy congestion and traffic hold ups. The narrow roads in the village with no public parking facilities, were simply not designed for the amount of traffic there is now, let alone with more residents. More residents will mean more cars as the public transport system is absolutely minimal. Commuting to major areas of employment, education, etc are virtually impossible without cars. There are no doctors or dentistry services locally either. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run off and impact local watercourses. Surely the further regeneration of Northwich town centre, where brownfield land and underused commercial areas offer a prime opportunity for sustainable, mixed use housing development should be considered along with the further development of Winnington Village.  As a long standing local resident of Davenham, I strongly object to these proposals and urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for residential development in Davenham be removed in the final local plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 3169

Received: 18/08/2025

Respondent: Dominic Lonsdale

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_3343
- NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 3172

Received: 18/08/2025

Respondent: Rachel Lonsdale

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_3346
- NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 3182

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Acton Bridge Parish Council

I&O_3356
We are concerned that NOR11 significantly reduces the separation between Acton Bridge and Weaverham. The distinctive identity of Acton Bridge could easily be lost. We are also concerned that NOR11 also covers an area along Sandy Lane which has been extensively flooded by the River Weaver in 2021 and again nearly flooded in 2022.  Development in NOR11 should be reduced from that shown and conbstrained to be closer to Weaverham as it currently exists. There have been a significant number of serious accidents at the junction of the A49 and Sandy Lane such that a speed reduction has been agreed around this junction funded jointly by CW&C, CW&C councillors members budgets, Acton Bridge and Weaverham Parish Councils. If NOR 11 and/or NOR12 go ahead then road traffic will increase significantly at this junction. A major road scheme will be needed to change this junction in order to minimise the number of accidents.

Comment

Representation ID: 3372

Received: 18/08/2025

Respondent: Angela Wright

I&O_3546
The infrastructure in Davenham is already struggling with doctors, dentists, schools etc stretched to capacity. Parking and traffic congestion is also already a major problem.  Public transport is minimal, there is a lack of facilities such as shops and a complete absence of any community centre. 

Comment

Representation ID: 3375

Received: 18/08/2025

Respondent: Gordon Coxon

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_3549
NORO6 - NORO7: The sites identified around the historic village of Davenham include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in reducing local flood risk. Davenhams infrastructure is already at or close to capacity and already suffers from heavy congestion, including London Road, Hartford Road and the A556. Further development would only exacerbate the problem. The schools are full to capacity, there are no dentists or enough doctors appointments. Parking within the village is mainly on the road which creates its own problems. The scale of the proposed development around Davenham would effectively double the size of the village.

Comment

Representation ID: 3452

Received: 22/08/2025

Respondent: John Edward Holmes

I&O_3626
Yes the impact upon congestion, loss of greenbelt, enviromental impact and the fact that existing infrastructure is already straing to cope with the existing levels of development

Comment

Representation ID: 3474

Received: 19/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah Evans

I&O_3648
NOR06 and NOR07 – Davenham : Conflict with Local Plan objectives : The Local Plan’s strategic objectives emphasise protection of heritage, rural character, high-quality agricultural land, and sustainable patterns of development. Large-scale expansion of Davenham would undermine these objectives. Heritage and identity : Davenham is a historic village with a designated Conservation Area and valued open spaces. Large housing allocations would be disproportionate to its size, risk eroding its distinct rural setting, and potentially harm heritage assets. Infrastructure capacity : Existing road infrastructure (A556, Hartford Road, London Road) experiences significant congestion, and public transport provision is limited. Further growth would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns, contrary to the Local Plan’s sustainable transport aims. Environmental constraints : Parts of the proposed sites play a role in mitigating local flood risk, and development would increase surface water run-off, potentially impacting nearby watercourses. The areas also support biodiversity that would be lost through development, conflicting with the Local Plan’s environmental protection goals. Loss of high-grade agricultural land : The proposed development sites include areas of Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land (Grades 1–3a), which the NPPF and the Local Plan seek to protect for food production and environmental value. More proportionate alternatives : Smaller-scale proposals currently in the planning system—such as the Wain Estates application, Stonhams pre-application, and Bostock Green development—collectively around 200 dwellings, align more closely with the village’s capacity and character. These could meet local housing needs without breaching the Local Plan’s environmental and infrastructure safeguards. Conclusion We request that large-scale allocations for Davenham (NOR06 and NOR07) are removed from the final Local Plan. This would ensure the strategy remains consistent with the Plan’s own objectives, protects high-quality agricultural land, maintains the historic character of the village, and directs growth to locations with greater capacity for sustainable development.

Comment

Representation ID: 3477

Received: 22/08/2025

Respondent: Gary Nunn

Question SS 31
I&O_3651
Yes, regarding NOR06 and NOR07:- Davenham is an historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting. Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would increase road traffic, leading to poorer air quality and, potentially, reduced safety. Currently, public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or are on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to the sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of Davenham. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive local support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For the above reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the Davenham and Bostock parish. Further I would suggest that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 3488

Received: 19/08/2025

Respondent: Daniel Oates

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_3662
NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of this development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village's size and setting. Davenham's existing infrastructure is already operating over capacity. The road network, particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham's capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan. The village simply could not take an increase in population at that scale.

Comment

Representation ID: 3561

Received: 22/08/2025

Respondent: Deryn O'Connor

I&O_3735
Northwich area should be developed

Comment

Representation ID: 3883

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Birtles

I&O_4065
SS31 Whilst improvements have been made over recent years, access from Winnington into Northwich remains an issue. Significant further growth needs to address capacity limitations of River Weaver crossings

Comment

Representation ID: 4053

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: ROBERT MCSWEENEY

I&O_4261
Clearly, all key services and infrastructures would need to be expanded in capacity commensurately with any developments, including increases in the provision of housing. Little Leigh Parish Council is very conscious of the limitations on traffic flows due to the restrictions imposed by the various bridges, including the very old swing bridges over the waterways.

Comment

Representation ID: 4318

Received: 19/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lesley Sharon Galloway

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_4547
NOR06 - NOR07  - Davenham is a historic village and areas within it are conservation areas. The proposals would dramatically change its identity and rural character. The volume of proposed housing is way out of keeping with the size of the village., changing its identity entirely. The existing roads are frequently congested, maneuvering through the village centre is difficult and with the increase in traffic the proposed number of houses would bring  - one or two cars per household - the situation would become intolerable. The village is already becoming less pleasant to walk in , with the increased pollution and safety issues of speeding cars causing problems. Where are all the residents going to work? If they are commuting in one or two more cars per household to areas beyond the immediate area, the pollution and congestion is going to increase rapidly. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding - a problem that has already occurred with recent builds. There will also be a loss of biodiversity and green spaces. My suggestion is that much greater consideration be given to the proposals concerning Davenham - the allocation is out of proportion with the size of the existing village, when other areas are not. I wonder why? I request that all current proposals for large scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4324

Received: 20/08/2025

Respondent: David Bibby

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_4553
NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village's size and setting Davenham's existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concers. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham's capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4370

Received: 20/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Spare

NOR06, NOR07, NOR08
I&O_4599
The Local Plan document states in Section 1.19, that multiple assessments have yet to be completed eg   Retail and Town Centres Study   Strategic Flood Risk Assessment   Housing Needs Assessment Green Belt Study   Infrastructure Delivery Plan   Strategic Viability Assessment Transport Assessment     The Davenham Neighbourhood Plan examines several of these issues and when CWAC undertake these crucial studies, it is very likely that will discover the range of difficulties discussed below and conclude that NOR06 NOR07 and NOR08 proposals are not compatible with the Local Plan principles.   The Local Plan contains the following statements 1.7 It will also set out policies that cover the same issues as those in the existing Local Plan such as protecting the Green Belt, protecting and providing open space and the natural and historic environment,     Protecting character – protecting the special character of the Cheshire countryside and its villages. Under Section 2 - VISION – PRINCIPLES The vision for Cheshire West and Chester is to be a desirable and attractive place to live, work, learn and visit with vibrant towns and villages, by meeting our development needs in sustainable locations. We will achieve this by applying the four overarching principles of: Promoting wellbeing – enabling all to enjoy safe and healthy lifestyles with a good quality of life Providing infrastructure – ensuring the provision of appropriate infrastructure in suitable locations to make Cheshire West and Chester a good place to live Protecting character – protecting the special character of the Cheshire countryside and its villages Contrary to the Section 2 principles, the massive expansion of villages such as Davenham will destroy, not protect their established character.  The area around and to the south of Davenham, although not designated green belt has the requisite quality of farmland and natural habitats There is very little spare capacity in the schools in Davenham, Moulton and Leftwich.  The colleges – ie John Deane’s and the Advanced Manufacturing & Engineering Academy at Winsford are also very popular.  Student numbers will inevitably increase if the developments currently in the planning system are approved.  The addition of several hundred houses - NOR06 and NOR07.  NOR08 would exceed the capacity of the primary schools and probably the high school and colleges. Areas of land suitable for new schools in the district are extremely limited. There are no surgeries nor dentists in Davenham so that any new residents would have to travel to Northwich, Winsford or Kingsmead which would increase the number of car journeys. There is a Fire and Rescue centre in Leftwich that serves all of the Northwich area.  Additional developments may require this to be expanded.

Comment

Representation ID: 4433

Received: 20/08/2025

Respondent: Ruth and Mike Smith

NOR06, NOR07, NOR08
I&O_4674
Traffic considerations NOR06, NOR07 and NOR08 would all increase the amount of traffic through the village to the schools when the roads are already very busy.  In the mornings the A556 is backed up towards Hartford and London Road down towards Northwich also. The traffic going along School Lane into the schools in Hartford is also very heavy in the mornings and again at school closing. The village school is situated off Charles Avenue and Allen Drive which both come off Mount Pleasant Road.  Many children are bought to the school in cars and this causes a problem with parking and dropping off/pick up in all these roads.  Mount Pleasant Road is on a bus route and parked cars cause a nuisance. Parked cars also cause as issue for pedestrians and neighbours.  Developers like to tell us how residents in new houses will walk their children to and from school, I believe this is unlikely and that there would be an increase in the number of cars.  Facilities and Infrastructure The village school does not have capacity for lots of extra children. The provision for children for six form is limited to Sir John Deane’s and St Nicholas and the Grange. Students who fail to be accepted at these schools must travel to Warrington (very heavy traffic through Warrington in the mornings), or to Crewe or Manchester.  This is not ideal as it puts even more traffic onto the roads.  It also seems very poor planning to send these children on long bus journeys when we had a perfectly good college facility in the area.  Young people need more sleep especially in the mornings and must get a bus very early to get to Warrington in time for classes. The train provision to Northwich is poor and access difficult at Northwich station for the disabled. The provision of health services in the area is over subscribed. Northwich has few shops, although plenty of coffee shops.  There are few activities and only one swimming pool. There is no Marks and Spencer and as an indicator; women’s’ clothing options limited to Matalan, supermarket chains and H and M. Davenham Hall, its drive and other buildings and meadows are an intrinsic part of Davenham Viilage.  The view from The Grove, Parson’s Court and from Riverside Organic Farm at ShipBrook should be retained as Protected Views or Vistas as the village historic mentions in the Domesday Book. Davenham village is a rural village and I would suggest that this is why many people moved to the area, by building so many houses on the surrounding fields this would destroy what makes I a great place to live.  (I am not sure why land to the North of Northwich is green belt but land to the South is not!) Land already earmarked for building in the village does not seem to have been taken into consideration. See the importance of these areas to the village by reading the village neighbourhood plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4448

Received: 20/08/2025

Respondent: Alan Evans

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_4696
NOR06 and NOR07 – Davenham: o Conflict with Local Plan objectives: The Local Plan’s strategic objectives emphasise protection of heritage, rural character, high-quality agricultural land, and sustainable patterns of development. Large-scale expansion of Davenham would undermine these objectives. o Heritage and identity: Davenham is a historic village with a designated Conservation Area and valued open spaces. Large housing allocations would be disproportionate to its size, risk eroding its distinct rural setting, and potentially harm heritage assets. o Infrastructure capacity: Existing road infrastructure (A556, Hartford Road, London Road) experiences significant congestion, and public transport provision is limited. Further growth would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns, contrary to the Local Plan’s sustainable transport aims. o Environmental constraints: Parts of the proposed sites play a role in mitigating local flood risk, and development would increase surface water run-off, potentially impacting nearby watercourses. The areas also support biodiversity that would be lost through development, conflicting with the Local Plan’s environmental protection goals. o Loss of high-grade agricultural land: The proposed development sites include areas of Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land (Grades 1–3a), which the NPPF and the Local Plan seek to protect for food production and environmental value. o More proportionate alternatives: Smaller-scale proposals currently in the planning system—such as the Wain Estates application, Stonhams pre-application, and Bostock Green development—collectively around 200 dwellings, align more closely with the village’s capacity and character. These could meet local housing needs without breaching the Local Plan’s environmental and infrastructure safeguards. Conclusion We request that large-scale allocations for Davenham (NOR06 and NOR07) are removed from the final Local Plan. This would ensure the strategy remains consistent with the Plan’s own objectives, protects high-quality agricultural land, maintains the historic character of the village, and directs growth to locations with greater capacity for sustainable development.

Comment

Representation ID: 4463

Received: 20/08/2025

Respondent: Gill Evans

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_4721
NOR06 and NOR07 – Davenham : o    Conflict with Local Plan objectives : The Local Plan’s strategic objectives emphasise protection of heritage, rural character, high-quality agricultural land, and sustainable patterns of development. Large-scale expansion of Davenham would undermine these objectives. o    Heritage and identity : Davenham is a historic village with a designated Conservation Area and valued open spaces. Large housing allocations would be disproportionate to its size, risk eroding its distinct rural setting, and potentially harm heritage assets. o    Infrastructure capacity : Existing road infrastructure (A556, Hartford Road, London Road) experiences significant congestion, and public transport provision is limited. Further growth would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns, contrary to the Local Plan’s sustainable transport aims. o    Environmental constraints : Parts of the proposed sites play a role in mitigating local flood risk, and development would increase surface water run-off, potentially impacting nearby watercourses. The areas also support biodiversity that would be lost through development, conflicting with the Local Plan’s environmental protection goals. o    Loss of high-grade agricultural land : The proposed development sites include areas of Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land (Grades 1–3a), which the NPPF and the Local Plan seek to protect for food production and environmental value. o    More proportionate alternatives : Smaller-scale proposals currently in the planning system—such as the Wain Estates application, Stonhams pre-application, and Bostock Green development—collectively around 200 dwellings, align more closely with the village’s capacity and character. These could meet local housing needs without breaching the Local Plan’s environmental and infrastructure safeguards. Conclusion We request that large-scale allocations for Davenham (NOR06 and NOR07) are removed from the final Local Plan.  This would ensure the strategy remains consistent with the Plan’s own objectives, protects high-quality agricultural land, maintains the historic character of the village, and directs growth to locations with greater capacity for sustainable development.

Comment

Representation ID: 4477

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Barnton Parish Council

I&O_4741
Winnington Lime beds - proposed ingress of HGV's Winnington bridge - not fit for purpose Narrow A roads in Barnton - danger to life Public services - services at capacity HGV ingress (Lostock incinerator/power station) No school or GP  places available  in Barnton or Comberbach  

Comment

Representation ID: 4489

Received: 20/08/2025

Respondent: Malcolm & Lynda Keat

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_4757
NOR06, NOR07 - Both of these are totally disproportionate for the village of Davenham. Davenham is a historic village mentioned in the Domesday Book of 1086 with a strong sense of identity and a designated conservation area. The developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village risk encroachment on the open spaces valued so highly by the community for the wellbeing of the residents. The existing infrastructure within Davenham is operating at near capacity with an accident blackspot at the roundabout joining the A556 and heavy congestion on Church St and Hartford Road where the carriageway is too narrow. In the centre of the village, London Road becomes heavily congested many times during each day due to parked cars visiting local traders with nowhere else to park than the roadside. Road safety is also an ongoing concern for both children and adults. Further housing developments would obviously exacerbate the problems in these areas and be detrimental to air quality and the safety of residents. I am aware that soil conditions in these areas are poor and there are flooding concerns or flood mitigation provisions to minimise any flooding integrated in the landscape. Any development would increase surface water run off and affect watercourses which in turn would increase damage due to flooding. A further consequence would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land that is contrary to the council’s sustainability objectives.  Currently there are at least two developments close to Davenham by Wain Estes and a smaller one at Bostock Green at differing stages of the planning process. They total some 200 houses and with the appropriate design and infrastructure development should be more in line with the village setting of Davenham. For these reasons, I would urge CWAC to reconsider the proposed developments around Davenham and ideally remove them or scale them  to a more appropriate level.

Comment

Representation ID: 4581

Received: 21/08/2025

Respondent: Caroline Gallimore

NOR06, NOR07
I&O_4864
NOR06 - NOR07 Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. I am aware of planning applications and interest from developers that are more aligned with the scale and character of the village. These include a current application submitted by Wain Estates, a pre-application from Stonhams, and a small development at Bostock Green collectively involving around 200 dwellings. These proposals would be more proportionate to Davenham’s capacity and infrastructure and would be more likely to receive support, provided they are delivered with appropriate design, infrastructure investment, and sensitivity to the village setting. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed or significantly scaled back in the final Local Plan. I also wish to point out that NOR7 in particular is located down a single rack roadway and would not be suitable for the additional excessive traffic that this would create, plus the fact that the Proposed Hydrogen Pipeline will be cutting straight across this ear marked land. This is an important part of the village green space for local residents to enjoy and also consideration must be made for the wildlife that is present in this area  And can be seen on a regular basis. , badgers, foxes , rabbits especially.To remove this prime agricultural land from production would be for the many reasons mentioned detrimental to the village life. For these reasons, I would urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider the proposed development allocations within the parish. I request that all current proposals for large-scale residential development in Davenham be removed.

Comment

Representation ID: 5155

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: TRACEY MANLEY

I&O_5519
Despite the bypass to Davenham village, the roads are congested at peak times, traffic attempting to access the local garage blocks the main London road completely and it is extremely dangerous for pedestrians without proper crossing places. Hartford and Mount Pleasant roads are used as short cuts and in a terrible state of repair.Doctors , dentists and hospitals are already at capacity. More housing will exacerbate these existing problems. Building on the surrounding fields will increase the potential for even more flooding and devastate the rich diversity of wildlife.  

Comment

Representation ID: 5315

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: The Bostock Estate

Agent: Fisher German LLP

I&O_5681
While the land adjacent to NOR05 has no significant flood risk or heritage constraints, infrastructure improvements will be necessary to support new residential development. This includes transport infrastructure to ensure safe and sustainable access onto Shurlach Lane and the A556, as well as utilities and local services.

Comment

Representation ID: 5561

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cllr Dan Marr

I&O_5933
There are significant contraints that must be considered in these areas. For example, the A556 is an extremely busy corridor between the M6, Northwich and Chester. During disruption, local roads already cannot cope with the diverted traffic and is a significant barrier to safety and local growth. As previously mentioned, there is an outline site for a new railway station at Gadbrook Park and Rudheath which should be a primary focus of any development in the area. Also, in regards to NOR07 and NOR08, the primary entrances would be off the A556 which would require significant investment and remdial works in order to provide access which would be highly distruptive in the event of any building. As pointed out by Davenham Parish Council in regards to NOR06, 07 and 08: - NOR06 - NOR07  Davenham is a historic village with a strong sense of identity and a designated Conservation Area. The proposed developments would dramatically alter the rural character of the village, and risk encroachment on heritage assets and open spaces valued by the community. The scale of development proposed is entirely disproportionate to the village’s size and setting Davenham’s existing infrastructure is already operating at or near capacity. The road network,particularly the A556, Hartford Road, and London Road, suffers from heavy congestion, and further development would exacerbate traffic, air quality, and safety concerns. Public transport provision is minimal, and additional residents would place unsustainable pressure on limited local bus services. The sites identified include areas at risk of flooding or on land that serves an important function in mitigating local flood risk. Any development here would increase surface water run-off and impact local watercourses. Furthermore, there would be a loss of biodiversity and greenfield land, contrary to sustainability objectives. There is no Doctors or Dentists surgery in the village and the primary school is operating at capacity. The bus service is limited and there is no access to a railway station without driving at least 15 mins to Hartford, Northwich or Plumley   - NOR06 - Land to the rear of Church Street and London Road Lack of adequate infrastructure is already known to CWAC Highways. This area would require access via two of the three busiest streets in the village! These roads operate at capacity at peak times A known and designated conservation area is situated in the centre of NOR06 NOR06 is home to two working farms and both of these landowners (either side of the Conservation area) have publicly stated they have no intention of selling their farms We are aware of a 72 Bed Dementia care nursing home currently working its way through the planning process - When approved, it will take land in NOR06 and increase traffic via staff visitors and suppliers There is a long established footpath here that would need to be protected A large sewage pipe runs across this land The land falls steeply down to Elderbriar brook. This would be overwhelmed with substantial surface water.  It feeds into the River Dane near the old stone bridge and this area has seen a broad area of flooded farmland in recent years. The area is known for its diverse fauna and flora with ancient trees that are home to a variety of birds The grass areas are homes to foxes hedgehogs bees etc and should be protected under existing wildlife and conservation requirements/regulations - NOR07 - Land off Eaton lane - currently down a single track lane Another Infrastructure hotspot known to CWAC Highways, as all current traffic from Eaton Lane, Eaton Crescent & Pritchard Drive, have to use Hartford road (The third known busiest road in the village) to access the A556 There has been serious flooding around the junction of Eaton Land and Hartford – below the site where NOR07 is proposed. Increased areas of tarmac and concrete will magnify this problem. A development of 440 houses would easily equate to over 800 cars - and Eaton Lane could not cope with this volume of traffic Eaton Lane (post cattle grid) is home to a ground works business, a working farm and a small residential site plus a Caravan Club recognised Camp site. These businesses would be severely impacted by any housing development   NORO7 has been identified by Cadent as a proposed route for a future Hydrogen pipeline. This introduces a significant future infrastructure constraint and raises potential safety and planning concerns. The presence of such a pipeline would almost certainly reduce the developable area and adds a further layer of risk that has not been adequately accounted for in the site assessment process Eaton Lane -the actual farm land is considered to be in the top 10 in the UK re it’s condition for growing crops. It is currently used to grow crops such as Maze & Cheshire new potatoes The Land is also home to numerous butterflies, bees, foxes, wood pigeons, buzzards and Bats, (we believe there could be a Roost in the trees near to the railway line) There is also Owls are nesting there and there are multiple Badger sets (which are now protected by the current Government) Cheshire Wildlife Trust are also in the process of identifying more wildlife corridors and Vale Royal Locks and the surrounding fields are in scope for this!

Comment

Representation ID: 5740

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Pamela Manning

I&O_6112
Road congestion and the Winnington Swing Bridge.