Comment

Representation ID: 12069

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Julie Mann

I&O_12583


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12070

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Matthew Smythe

I&O_12584
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12073

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Osborne

I&O_12587


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12074

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Pauline Dickinson

I&O_12588
Option A, retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12075

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Natalie Evans

I&O_12589
I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is OPTION A - RETAIN THE GREENBELT

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12081

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Bill and Lesley Gover

I&O_12595
I would like to submit my comment on the new Local Plan for Cuddington and Sandiway. In relation to Question SS 11, my Choice is OPTION A - RETAIN THE GREEN BELT

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12084

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Bill and Lesley Gover

I&O_12598
I would like to submit my comment on the new Local Plan for Cuddington and Sandiway. In relation to Question SS 11, my Choice is OPTION A - RETAIN THE GREEN BELT

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12085

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Janet Cross

I&O_12599


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12087

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Prudence Knight

I&O_12601
Option A. Retain the green belt. I feel very strongly about this. The local area cannot support more people and vehicles. Also why waste perfectly good agricultural land, which the country needs

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12089

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Michael Ward

I&O_12603
Option (A)

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12097

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Olwen Scott

I&O_12611
We are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed large scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. We are answering Question SS 11 and our choice is: Option A - Retain the Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12098

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Tucker

I&O_12612
answer A, protect the Green Belt. I write to protest most strongly that Chester certainly does not need more housing especially in Green belt and definitely NOT in Mickle Trafford. Currently there are 12 unsold properties in our Village Mickle Trafford alone. Our NHS services are already overwhelmed and cannot cope with existing demand. Our village school is at capacity and could not accommodate more primary school children. The road serving this school is small, and school runs are already bedlam. It would be impossible to accommodate more school run traffic. Our village relies on its small size to retain its rural character and feel. This is why we chose to live here in the first place.  
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives
Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12102

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Emma Stam

I&O_12616
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12103

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Sanderson

I&O_12617


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12105

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Thomas and Veronica McCabe

I&O_12619


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12110

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Julie Shore

I&O_12624
I don’t understand why houses carn’t be built on brown field sites before using these areas. I see so many properties around here empty that should be considered first.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12111

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Carolyn Farthing

I&O_12625
Having been made aware of the proposed large-scale development in and around Neston and Parkgate, I am writing to express my deep concerns over the plans. I am strongly opposed to the proposal. In answer to Question SS 11* my choice is: *Option A - Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12117

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Gould

I&O_12631
Mere Brow Farm Cheshire Permaculture Project I am answering question SS11 and my choice is Option A retain the green belt. I appeal to the planning authorities to reject the proposal to build all these new houses. Do we not have a declining birth rate? Will all these houses really be necessarily in 20 or 30 years from now Or will in fact many of them be left empty. There is currently an obsession with building houses. Yet we have so many empty houses. William Blake's 'green and pleasant' land is fast becoming a grey dull housing estate. Where are the children of future generations going to play? Where are we to ramble when our fields and beautiful countryside are but ugly roads and houses.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12118

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Anne Parsons

I&O_12632
My reasoning for the above is as follows:     a - We as a country need to protect agriculture and provide food security, we should not be reclassifying or building on agricultural land     b -  Brownfield sites should be used for any further development  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12120

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Gavin

I&O_12634


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12122

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Kay Corcoran

I&O_12636


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12123

Received: 19/08/2025

Respondent: Lea-by-Backford Parish Council

I&O_12637
See attached combined response from Lea-by-Backford Parish Council and Backford Parish Council

Comment

Representation ID: 12124

Received: 19/08/2025

Respondent: Backford Parish Council

I&O_12638
See attached combined response from Lea-by-Backford Parish Council and Backford Parish Council

Comment

Representation ID: 12145

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Bradbury

I&O_12659
I am answering question SS 11 of the consolation document and my preference is Option A - Retain the Green Belt. I believe there is already enough urbanisation of Cheshire’s countryside and the county will lose its character with the other options. In my opinion, the consolation document is far too long and complicated for most people to respond to.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12146

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Susie Felix

I&O_12660
Option A - Retaining Green Belt. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12152

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Miss Saffron Cheetham

I&O_12666

Neither of these
Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12154

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Tania Coventry

I&O_12668
My choice is Option A - Retain the Green Belt”.   I am from the Neston area and the Green Belt Land serves a great benefit to the community with much of it crossed by public footpaths regularly used and enjoyed by residents. These green spaces should be protected and Neston Town Councillors will recall the local residents uproar when a track called “Cuckoo Lane” was covered in hardcore (the track runs through Green Belt Land close to Little Neston).  Such action highlights how important this Green Belt is to the local community.    The Green Belt Land is also valuable farmland which should be kept in its existing use and local farmers supported and not burdened with the worry of having their businesses destroyed.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12156

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Rob Randall

I&O_12670
I support the retention of the Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12157

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Jay Bradberry

I&O_12671


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12161

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Connor Archer

I&O_12675
Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt