Comment

Representation ID: 12162

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Yvonne Gavin

I&O_12676
I choose option  A  - to retain the green belt.   The green belt is what helps to make the village what it is, housing, schools and small business’s mixed in a rural and agricultural setting. To build upon this land in a significant way would have a negative impact on the village.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12165

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Alison Kippax

I&O_12679
I would like to lodge my objection to the proposed further development in the area of Kelsall. I am responding to question SS 11 and would be in favour of response A. Retaining our present designated green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12166

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jennifer Sanderson

I&O_12680
Your query as to which option I support in answer to question SS 11 is option A.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12167

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: keith vernon

I&O_12681
I am FOR option A, to retain the Green Belt. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12169

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Anne Moran

I&O_12683
In respect of question SS 11 in the report my preference would be Option B. This enables development to follow the existing neighbourhood plan which has been developed with much care and thought.

Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 12172

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jayne Wilson

I&O_12686

Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 12180

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Davies

I&O_12694

Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 12185

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Martin ONeill

I&O_12699
Too much land is being taken over by house building, this is happening all over the country, thousands of new houses have been built within Mid-Cheshire over the last 5 years yet nothing is done about the infrastructure, i.e schools, hospitals, Doctors, Dentist, roads are falling apart, Councils are getting more money not only due to the Council Tax going up but also the number of new house yet the service we are getting is less and less.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12192

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mitch Illston

I&O_12706


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12210

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Paul McGeorge

SS 11
I&O_12724
Option A Retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12214

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jim Carew

SS 11
I&O_12728
I strongly support Option A – Retain the Green Belt, as the infrastructure in and around Chester simply cannot support large-scale new housing developments   on Green Belt land. The city is unique in its geography and road network, but this also limits its ability to expand responsibly. The presence of major motorways and a fragile road system, combined with low-capacity bridges and small, historic streets, means the system is already at its limit. Additional car journeys from thousands of new homes will exacerbate congestion, increase pollution, and reduce quality of life for residents.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12216

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: David Hennessey

SS 11
I&O_12730
My choice is Option A - retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12217

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Alan Manger

SS 11
I&O_12731
My choice is Option A to Retain the Greenbelt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12218

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Wendy Glendinning

SS 11
I&O_12732
We strongly reject plans for CUD05 cuddington and Sandiway) Option A is our strong view.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12220

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Linda Rooney

I&O_12734


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12221

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr David Pickering

I&O_12735
I'm an Acton Bridge resident. Avoiding erosion of Green Belt and the preservation of the character of the village are very important to my family. For that reason, I would vote for Option A to retain the Green Belt.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12222

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Heather Campbell

I&O_12736
I am writing to give my full support  for the protection of our greenbelt. I am answering question SS11 and my choice is option A = retain our greenbelt. Resident of Christleton. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12224

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Andy Hollingworth

I&O_12738
I’m writing in response to the consultation document and am specifically answering question SS 11  and confirming that my answer is: Option A - Retain the Green Belt  I do not believe the village [Barnton] has the infrastructure to support so many new homes specifically: A would like to see our green spaces and the character of the village preserved. Potholed roads which would be too small for works vehicles or addition traffic due to a development which would make their state even worse. Insufficient bridge access at the bottom of Soot Hill to support additional traffic heading to Northwich. Insufficient Schooling capacity. Insufficient GP services.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12225

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah Nash

I&O_12739
We are in favour of:  option A retaining the Green Belt . Option A must be the only consideration of the council as it safeguards our green belt and countryside.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12227

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mandy Townsend

I&O_12741
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt* I am a Neston resident 

Comment

Representation ID: 12229

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Tom Gibbons

I&O_12743


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12230

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Stephen Glendinning

SS 11
I&O_12744
We strongly reject plans for CUD05 (Cuddington and Sandiway). Option A is our strong view.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12232

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Payne

I&O_12746
I am emailing my views because your online consultation form is extremely poor and not user friendly.  Why are these potentially substantial changes not more widely advertised either? Speaking to neighbours and family living in Vicars Cross, they had zero knowledge of this consultation.  Regarding the Local Plan, specifically the "spatial strategy options" - I support "Option A - Retain the Green belt".  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12233

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Rachel McCabe

I&O_12747
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.  I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12234

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Emma Catterall

SS 11
I&O_12748
I would like to vote for option A (retain the green belt).

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12238

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Christopher Ellett

I&O_12752
I would like to add my name to the consultation about building on the green belt in Cheshire.  In answer to question SS11 my choice is Option A - Retain the Green Belt.   

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12239

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Maureen Hinks

I&O_12753
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering question SS11 and my choice is: OPTION A - Retain the Greenbelt.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12244

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Greenfield

I&O_12758
Therefore, if we have to have any new housing around CuddingtonI would prefer Option A - Retain The Green Belt. Therefore building on CUD02 and CUD03. Although this still has issues with the land being primarily green and causing urban sprawl.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12245

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Georgia Cheales

SS 11
I&O_12759
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. My choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12247

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: David Cooper

I&O_12761
Of these, I support Option A – Retain the Green Belt, because it protects rural character greatly appreciated by walkers, cyclists, (The Sandstone Trail), and why people have chosen to live here.  It is safe and secure, away from noise pollution, air pollution and an area of low crime. Property prices are reflected in this and it is more expensive to live in this area and therefore may not suit rehousing of people from a city or urban areas who are used to a lot of facilities being on hand and where you need to run a car. At present the bus service is 1 bus a week to 1 destination.  It would totally change the area and bring in people who may not be able to cope without shops, doctors, transport links, where the nearest hospital is 16 miles away. I do not support Option B or C because it risks overdevelopment in sensitive areas, increases car dependency and lacks supporting services.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt