Comment

Representation ID: 11836

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Caroline Quick

SS 11
I&O_12335
I would like to register my answer to question SS 11 and give my answer as Option A - retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11840

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jacqueline Scurry

SS 11
I&O_12339
I write with reference to SS11  in particular to NOR10.  I specifically select option A to request to retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11844

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Christina Jones

I&O_12343
In response to Question SS 11, I support the retention of the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11845

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah Thorley

I&O_12344
In answer to question SS11 My voice is Option A - retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11846

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Laurence Cooper

I&O_12345
Re. The Green Belt policy document.  I am answering question SS11 and my choice is: Option A - Retain the Green Belt.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11851

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Michelle Cooke

I&O_12350
I wish to object to the potential building of new properties adjacent to Delamere Park. I therefore opt for option A - Retain the Greenbelt. This is for the reasons of retaining the exclusive nature of the village and it's way of life, preventing excessive increases in traffic and unmanageable pressure on resources such as GP services. There has already been considerable development in the area. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11863

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Karen Robinson

I&O_12362
my choice is Option A - Retain the Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11864

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Adam Moore

I&O_12363
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. It has been suggested that a housing shortage of 180 homes are required in this area so I am completely against the enormous proposal.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11865

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Andy Davies

I&O_12364
Option A save the greenbelt land

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11866

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Angela Briggs

I&O_12369
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11869

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: John and Jane Hunt

I&O_12379
We reside in the Cuddington and Sandiway area. We recognise that you have provided three options on which to comment. A,B,C. Our understanding is that 1914 houses are required per annum and the purpose of the consultation is to identify where these houses should be located.  On this basis we wish to object to all three options.  Cuddington & Sandiway does not have the infrastructure, it does not have long term sustainability for development and would lead to long term loss of productive farmland classified as best and most versatile (BMV). Food security should remain a national priority.

None of these

Comment

Representation ID: 11871

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Demi Ellis

I&O_12383
I am writing to you to have my say as a local resident in the Northwich area. Regarding the proposal for 5000 new houses all around northwich and surrounding area. Including 1700 north of Barnton.  I am not in favour of this happening. Specifically I am very much in favour of the option A for question SS11 (retain the green belt). Currently, I have multiple road works taking place all on close by roads - this as you can imagine has caused a large amount of traffic all throughout the day, especially, during popular commute times. (I received no warnings prior to the works taking place). And I can only imagine the upheaval of having the same works happening, only with another 5000 new residents trying to use the same roads. Baring in mind, that there is also no alternative roads to take. As a resident, this does not work. Not only this, as a existing resident I have already experienced the struggles of for example - registering as a patient at a local doctors clinic and obtaining a appointment, not to mention, I have still not been able to register at any local dental practices as a patient in this area. As the town and surrounding area does not have the capacity to obtain the current residents, not to mention the new housing proposal residents.  I feel as a existing resident, we do not need new housing, but more amenities throughout the Northwich area, to accommodate the already over population. The town centre still has plenty of empty shopping spaces. If you do however, need more options for basic amenities for example, you will not find them locally, you must travel to Winsford or Crewe or even further a field to Chester or Manchester.  Futhermore, the local roads themselves are in disrepair, many with deep and undetectable pot holes throughout. Having to add even more daily commuters would only continue to cause more damage. As they seem to resurface consistently with the day to day traffic we have already. To add to this, the main train commute is already degraded and lacks the ability to run regularly, not forgetting the extortionate prices if this would be your only means of transportation.  So as a existing resident, I must admit I am very much in favour of the option A for question SS11 (retain the green belt). This I believe is the only option to be taken. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11873

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Caroline Charles

I&O_12387
My choice is option A - Retain the Green Belt. Upton and specifically the A41 near the zoo, could not handle any increase in traffic volume.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11874

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ann Parsons

I&O_12388
Option A - Retain Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11875

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Rachel Cross

I&O_12389
My choice is Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11879

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Wendy Thomasson

I&O_12393
Having been made aware of the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate, I am writing to express my deep concerns over the plans. I am strongly opposed to the proposal.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11880

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Alan Parsons

I&O_12394


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11881

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Gorman

I&O_12395
I am writing in response to the planning consultation presentation. (Local plan issues and options) In relation to question SS11, i vote for option B, the current local plan should be followed, Kelsall parish council already had a local plan with areas proposed for housing and this should be followed. Also please be aware, there is a Facebook campaign taking place, encouraging people to vote for ‘Option A’ without having reviewed the presentation, I have attached a copy of this Facebook campaign. I feel that is extremely unfair and not giving a true reflection of opinion.

Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 11886

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Ken Tait

I&O_12400
I am writing to express my very strong objections to the proposed large-scale development on GREENBELT land in and around Neston and Parkgate. In answering Question SS 11 of your survey to local residents my choice is  Option A - RETAINING the GREENBELT.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11887

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Daniel Moorhead

I&O_12401
In answer to Question SS 11 - I have chosen Option A retain the green belt. We are suffering a mental health crisis at the moment throughout the country. My wife is a mental health councillor and sees first hand how much the green space and areas help people who are suffering. I believe building in these areas will add to the problems with depression and many things associated with poor mental health. We should be utilising brown field sites and regeneration of areas of housing that has been left unoccupied as a priority.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11889

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Lynda Philips

I&O_12403


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11890

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire Reid Entwistle

I&O_12404
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.  I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11892

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Chris Green

I&O_12406
my choice is option A – retain the GREEN belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11893

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sharon Hudson

I&O_12407


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11894

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Melanie McAnaw

I&O_12408
Anything built across the river in the Barnton, Anderton and Comberbach area can simply not happen. The infrastructure simply will not cope. It barely manages now. In Anderton / Comberbach the greenbelt is a huge draw for people visiting the area, with Marbury park and other beautiful countryside for people to enjoy. Therefore I favour option A for question SS11 (retain the green belt).

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11896

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Christopher Green

I&O_12410


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11898

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Hannah Thorley

I&O_12412
In response to question SS11 I chose option A - retain the green belt 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11903

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Antoinette York

I&O_12417
My family and I purchased a family home on the beautiful Swanlow Fields estate. We purchased here because of the beautiful countryside and now CWAC want to build new homes on the green belt land!   In response to CWAC consulting on building new homes on the green belt. This land is precious!  I am answering Question SS 11. My choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 11909

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Tarporley Parish Council

I&O_12423
Tarporley Parish Council does not support Option A. The Parish Council supports an approach which combines Options B & C. A key criterion of the Local Plan must be that the level of growth is able to be absorbed by a community whilst retaining its current character. Option A, to retain all the current Green Belt will prevent sustainable growth in villages and areas in the green belt while increasing pressure on green field sites in the open countryside. It is important however that the development in these areas does not erode the gaps between large settlements that the green belt was introduced to protect. Option B, to continue existing policies will result in the over development of the key service centres including Tarporley. Option C – to consider development along sustainable transport routes will take the pressure off key service centres and will also result in development which has access to good public transport and does not rely on narrow county lanes to reach the wider road network.

Comment

Representation ID: 11914

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Jeffrey

I&O_12428


Option A - Retain the Green Belt