Comment

Representation ID: 10348

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Joanne Murphy

I&O_10845
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10349

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Louise Medlam

I&O_10846
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.  I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10350

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Janice Bell

I&O_10847
Re the consultation document question SS11 - I am choosing Option A - Retain the Green Belt. This plan is set to destroy this area of Cheshire west turning it into a grid locked urban environment. The green belt is shrinking so fast we are losing all sorts of wildlife and clean air. There are plenty of brown field sites which should be developed, and numerous abandoned homes causing an eyesore, concentrate on these first. The roads struggle to cope with the current levels of traffic without adding more into the mix and adding more traffic lights will bring everything to a halt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10351

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Deborah Porritt

I&O_10848
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large scale development on green belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering question ss11 and my choice is Option A retain the green belt 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10352

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Debbie Jones

I&O_10849
In response to the consultation document regarding where thousands of new homes could be built within Cheshire and Chester West, in particular question SS11 my choice is Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10353

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Gail Trainor

I&O_10850
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is - * Option A -  Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10354

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Colin Weeks

I&O_10851
I am emailing you with regards to the proposed housing areas surrounding Weaverham Village NOR10, NOR11, and NOR12  In answer to question SS11, I would like to choose Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10356

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Rowland Woolford

I&O_10853
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10357

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Gary Woodward

NOR10, NOR11, NOR12
I&O_10854
To whom it may concern, I am emailing you with regards to the proposed housing areas surrounding Weaverham village. (NOR10, NOR11, NOR12) In answer to question SS 11, I would like choose Option A- Retaining Green Belt. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10360

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Sally & Gordon Cole

I&O_10857
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10361

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Pamela Birch

I&O_10858
I am answering Question SS11 and my choice is Option A- Retain the Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 10362

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Justin and Kat Hussey

I&O_10859
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10363

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Dr John Ironmonger

I&O_10860
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10364

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Ironmonger

I&O_10861
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10365

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Deborah Mason-Smith

I&O_10862
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10366

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Robert Jones

I&O_10863
Regarding the consultation document and the subject of where thousands of new homes could be built within Cheshire and Chester West, in particular question SS11, my choice is Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10367

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Bahram Saadian

I&O_10864
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land around Neston and Pargate. I am answering Question SS11 and my choice is: Option A- Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10368

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Helen Washington

I&O_10865
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10369

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mark Ainsworth

I&O_10866
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10370

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Cheri Bradley

I&O_10867
I am FOR Option A, to retain the Greenbelt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10371

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Margaret Ainsworth

I&O_10868
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Comment

Representation ID: 10372

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Agnieszka Wieteska-Pym

I&O_10869
I'm writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston/Parkgate  I am answering question SS 11 and my choice is answer A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10373

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Judith Phoenix

I&O_10870
I am writing to you with regard to question ss 11, I am supporting plan A, because it is the better of the three options for Barnton village, my reasons are :- 1, the land that is proposed to be built on is good farm land, on which grows, wheat, barley, oats, rapeseed, potatoes, corn and other foods. Cattle also graze on some of the land. Food production is vital for the country and should be protected. 2, If it was decided to build 1600 houses on green belt land, the village would be twice its original size and would merge with Comberbach, thereby losing their identities. 3, the schools in Barnton and Comberbach are both full to their capacity, so new a school would need to be built before any houses were built. The Doctors are also full, so extra medics would be needed. 4, The road infrastructure would not be able to cope with all the extra traffic as it is very narrow through the centre of the village. Travel to Northwich requires a route over two bridges. One is an ageing swing bridge that is subject of a protection order and the second is a historic sandstone bridge that is extremely narrow. A new bridge, which has already been subject of a Government funding bid and a ring road would be needed if this extra building was-to go ahead.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10374

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Matthew Wieteska-Pym

I&O_10871
I'm writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston/Parkgate  I am answering question SS 11 and my choice is answer A - Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10377

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Scott & Jen Maslin

I&O_10874
My recommendation for the item SS11 is Option A - Retain the green belt. We believe that new houses should be built nearer to main road arteries and keeping travel disruption to villages to a minimum.  Our British way of life is disappearing before our eyes! Please let villages be villages - we choose to live here for that reason, we don't want to live in 'Barnton town' with the additional noise and traffic should the building of 1700 houses bring.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10384

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Rachel Watkins

NOR01
I&O_10881
I am writing to register my objection to the plans to build on the green belt between Barnton and Marbury, land adjacent to Hough Lane. This is marked as NOR 01 on your proposal. I am answering SS 11 and selecting Option A, Retain the green belt. The village of Barnton needs additional infrastructure if it is to expand to this level. An upgraded bridge to Northwich for vehicles and pedestrians and the chutes footpath fixed to allow better pedestrian access. There are not enough doctor, dentist and school places to support the additional homes and the destruction of wildlife habitats would be irreversible.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10385

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Pez Tellett

I&O_10882
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. There is not the infrastructure to cope.   I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is:   *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10386

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Matt Watkins

NOR01
I&O_10883
I am writing to register my objection to the plans to build on the green belt between Barnton and Marbury, land adjacent to Hough Lane. This is marked as NOR 01 on your proposal. I am answering SS 11 and selecting Option A, Retain the green belt. The village of Barnton needs additional infrastructure if it is to expand to this level. An upgraded bridge to Northwich for vehicles and pedestrians and the chutes footpath fixed to allow better pedestrian access. There are not enough doctor, dentist and school places to support the additional homes and the destruction of wildlife habitats would be irreversible.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10387

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Christine Brew

I&O_10884
Regarding the consultation document and the subject of where thousands of new homes could be built within Cheshire and Chester West, in particular question SS11, my choice is Option A - Retain the Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10388

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Lisa White

NOR10, NOR11, NOR12
I&O_10885
I am emailing you with regards to the proposed housing areas surrounding Weaverham village. (NOR10, NOR11, NOR12) In answer to question SS 11, I would like choose Option A-  Retaining Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt