Comment

Representation ID: 10440

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Jemma Arragoni

I&O_10938


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10441

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah Roberts

I&O_10939


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10443

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Anne Salmon

I&O_10941


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10444

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Callum Dawson

I&O_10942


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10445

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Callum Dawson

I&O_10943
It would impact too much on the current infrastructure and traffic in our area. We do not support further homes being build and consider the current new build sites are more than enough. This is too much!

Comment

Representation ID: 10446

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Rachael Hurst

I&O_10944


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10447

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Nigel Davis

I&O_10945


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10449

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Katie Deakin

I&O_10947


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10453

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Joshua Tayman

I&O_10951


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10457

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Leanne Horobin

I&O_10955


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10458

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Richard Deakin

I&O_10956


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10460

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Megan Nadin

SS11
I&O_10958
I am answering question SS 11 and my choice is A, to retain the green belt. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10461

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Price

SS11
I&O_10959
I wish to answer Question SS11. My choice is Option A- retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10462

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Anne Marie Lucas

SS 11
I&O_10960
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. Green belt should be protected and preserved.  I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is:  *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10463

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Lucy Rushby

I&O_10961
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*  
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 10464

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Marlee Rushby

I&O_10962
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10465

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Victoria Allman

I&O_10963
I wish to answer Question SS11.My choice is Option A- retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10466

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Les Merrills

I&O_10964
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.  I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10467

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr James Doran

SS 11
I&O_10965
In response to Question SS 11, I support the retention of the Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10468

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Wills

I&O_10966
I have seen the public consultation document regarding potential future housing developments in the Northwich area. I am specifically looking at the area shown on the map as NOR01 surrounding Barnton and Anderton. I would like to respond to question SS11 and state that my choice is Option A - Retain the Greenbelt. This area of beautiful countryside is very important to local residents. We use it for wellbeing such as running, cycling and walks. It provides peace and tranquility and home for local wildlife. It would be a huge, irreversible loss if this area were to be developed.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10470

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Elizabeth Grant

I&O_10968
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt* Parkgate is in a conservation area and already our waste water infrastructure, doctors, dentists, schools and road network are at their limits.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10471

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Dani Small

SS 11
I&O_10969
In response to Question SS 11 , I support the retention of the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10472

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Suzanne Merrills

SS4 11
I&O_10970
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.  I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is:   *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10473

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Curtis Whitby

I&O_10971
I am answering question SS 11. My choice is option A - retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10474

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Karen Bridson

SS 11
I&O_10972
In response to Question SS 11 , I support the retention of the Green Belt. Please do not build any further and ruin what is left of our green belt. It would impact too much on the current infrastructure and traffic in our area. We do not support further homes being build and consider the current new build sites are enough.  Enough is enough please stop further loss of green fields

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10479

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Fiona Moore

I&O_10977
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. It has been suggested that a housing shortage of 180 homes are required in this area so I am completely against the enormous proposal. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10480

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Bex Wieckowski

SS 11
I&O_10978
Please accept this email as my response to the proposed planning in Northwich. Regarding Question SS11, my choice is; Option A, Retain the Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10482

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Cranston

SS 11
I&O_10980
We are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. We are answering Question SS 11 and our choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10487

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Trish Taylor

SS 11
I&O_10985
I am responding to question SS11 and my response is: Option A - retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10488

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Ann Naylor

I&O_10986
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.  I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt