Comment

Representation ID: 10390

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Thomas

I&O_10887
I would strongly stand behind Option A , to retain the green belt. And I would encourage any members to Cheshire council to visit and survey thr people of the Wyre and Ribble Valley boroughs of Lancashire / Preston as to their feelings towards ripping up Green Belt policies.  I grew up and subsequently moved away from a similarly semi rural, suburban area. An area that had local identities, pride and a feeling to each town. An area where commuting to the local city was easy & working in the city & living beyond made sense for all. That was destroyed by over development,  joining towns along main roads, to form one continuous line of urban sprawl. Years of delays, years of roadworks, loss of green space, loss of local identity,  zero impact on hose prices or rental prices. Just money in house builder's pockets and endless traffic.  We moved to Cheshire in search of that life,  please don't turn Cheshires small towns and villages into building sites full of new build sprawl.  The A51 & A41 are at capacity on any given day. Vicars cross junction is a working persons nightmare. As is any journey out of Cheshire towards Warrington, Cheshire is sought after because it offers a way of life, long lost elsewhere. Please don't turn it into another pile of urban wreck. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10391

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: James and Alana Perry

I&O_10888
We are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. We are answering *Question SS 11* and our choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10392

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: John MacLeary

I&O_10889
Please put on record my preference for option C of the planning proposals. Imposing 10000 new homes on Winsford, without any commensurate investment in infrastructure such as doctors, dentists and schools will have a disastrous impact on the community.   Option C, with its reference to transport infrastructure, is the best for all.

Option C - Sustainable transport corridors

Comment

Representation ID: 10393

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Josh & Katie Edgington

I&O_10890
Re the expansion plans in the whole Northwich area and question SS 11 I strongly prefer option A which is to preserve our already dwindling green belt.   As well as the infrastructure around Northwich, Winnington, Barnton & Anderton unable to take anymore road traffic, this would also kill off one of the areas local visitor hot spots, Anderton Boat Lift, which draws in visitors across the country due to the the green belt surrounding the reserve.   With plenty of brown sites in the area we should be protecting & celebrating the few green belts we have left. Please let us keep our areas healthy & protected for future generations.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10394

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Kathryn Bryan

I&O_10891
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt* I have lived here all my life and strongly oppose building a new housing collective, our town has plenty of houses for its residents and just enough beautiful country side. Please don't ruin it.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10395

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Jennie Herbert

I&O_10892
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10396

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Emsley

I&O_10893
My response to question SS 11 . My choice is Option A Retain the Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10397

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Steph Bowers

I&O_10894
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10398

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Vanessa Joslin

I&O_10895
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10399

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Freyja Collingsmith

I&O_10896
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10400

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: E Pierrel

I&O_10897
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10406

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mark Rollason

I&O_10903
I’m sending this email in answer to question SS 11 and my choice is Option A “Retain Greenbelt”.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10408

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mary Render

SS11
I&O_10906
I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10410

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Joe Stephenson

I&O_10908
In response to question SS11 I would choose Option A to retain the greenbelt. The greenbelt is important and was a key decision for moving to the area.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10411

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Dominic Kent

I&O_10909
In answer to question SS 11 My choice is Option A- retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10412

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Danielle Burnside

I&O_10910
In answer to question SS11 my choice is Option A - retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10413

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Collingsmith

I&O_10911
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10414

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Jacqui McCormick

I&O_10912
I am writing to let you know my feeling about the proposed building plans on GREEN BELT LAND. I am writing in answer to Question SS 11 and my choice is OPTION  A - RETAIN THE GREEN BELT. Once it's gone it's gone and there is little enough left. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10415

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Scott Rawlinson

I&O_10913
For question SS 11, I would like to select option A: Retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10417

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Andy Joslin

I&O_10915
I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is:   Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10418

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Kerry and David Bentley

I&O_10916
With regard to the options presented, we strongly support OPTION A, which is to preserve local farmland and green spaces.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10421

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Helen E Bell

I&O_10919
I am submitting my choice of answer to question SS 11 and I chose   Option A - Retain Green Belt. I am submitting my choice of answer to question SS 11 and I chose   Option A - Retain Green Belt. I am submitting my choice of answer to question SS 11 and I chose   Option A - Retain Green Belt. I am submitting my choice of answer to question SS 11 and I chose   Option A - Retain Green Belt. I am submitting my choice of answer to question SS 11 and I chose   Option A - Retain Green Belt. I am submitting my choice of answer to question SS 11 and I chose Option A - Retain Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10422

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: David R Morris

I&O_10920
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10423

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mike Van Gordon

I&O_10921
In response to SS11 my choice is option A) retain the greenbelt. Any other option would surely be a failure of CWaC to deliver a sustainable future for the county it is meant to be representing.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10424

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Emma Lloyd

I&O_10922
In response to Question SS 11 , I support the retention of the Green Belt  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10425

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Howard Leonard

I&O_10923
Ref to the recent Proposal for 5000 new houses all around northwich and surrounding area. Including 1700 north of barnton I favour option A for question SS11 (retain the green belt)

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10427

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Flavio Arragoni

I&O_10925
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10434

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Susan & Stephen Britton

I&O_10932
Greenbelt has been established to protect our country from urban sprawl.  We believe that, wherever possible, building on it should be avoided. We need green spaces. If sustainable transport is high on the agenda, then Option C which emphasises growth around railway stations would appear to be the best choice, but only if the transport system is improved.  Many local residents work in Liverpool, Manchester and further afield and services must be improved if they are to be encouraged to leave their cars at home.

Option C - Sustainable transport corridors

Comment

Representation ID: 10438

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Jessica Dawson

I&O_10936


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10439

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Jessica Dawson

I&O_10937
Please stop building new homes and damaging the infrastructure of where we live. Enough is enough. The traffic is awful, the drains are overflowing. Focus on allowing us to improve the homes we have and stop the delays in the current planning permissions which are no doubt taken up by all these new home applications