Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 11688

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12186
No.

Comment

Representation ID: 11689

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12187
Potentially, as such sites are likely to be more suitable than provision in the open countryside or Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 11690

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12188
This should be considered in the light of the GT need assessment which is yet to be published.

Comment

Representation ID: 11692

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12190
Not that we are aware of.

Comment

Representation ID: 11693

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12191
No

Comment

Representation ID: 11695

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12193
In broad terms yes. The policy should specifically reference the health benefits of having access to the countryside, for example through public rights of way and bridleways and of having access to nature, in line with the emerging Cheshire and Warrington Local Nature Recovery Strategy.

Comment

Representation ID: 11696

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12194
No

Comment

Representation ID: 11697

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12195
No comment.

Comment

Representation ID: 11699

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12197
No comment.

Comment

Representation ID: 11700

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12198
No comment.