Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for CPRE Cheshire Branch search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 11
Representation ID: 11677
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12175
Yes. However, we would welcome strengthening of Policy DM25 clause 5 to make it clearer that over-sized dwellings which are much larger than the functional requirement will not be allowed.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 12
Representation ID: 11678
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12176
Through conditions and/or section 106 agreements.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 13
Representation ID: 11679
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12177
This advice note should at the very least be retained (and specifically referred to in the policy) to enable adequate control over this type of development.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 14
Representation ID: 11680
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12178
No comments.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 15
Representation ID: 11681
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12179
Yes. We support the need for schemes to be generally modest in scale, in keeping with the form and character of the settlement and in line with a robust housing needs assessment. We would also stress the need for such schemes to be developed in close consultation with any relevant local Parish and/or Town Council.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 16
Representation ID: 11682
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12180
We cannot see why it would not apply to all smaller settlements, but subject to criteria such as those we identify in our answer to Q HO15.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 17
Representation ID: 11684
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12182
Only where this is clearly justified by robust and independent viability evidence, kept to a minimum level and where the overall benefits of the scheme clearly over-ride any planning harm.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question HO 18
Representation ID: 11685
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12183
No comment.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question GT 1
Representation ID: 11686
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12184
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question GT 2
Representation ID: 11687
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch
I&O_12185
Yes. Gypsy and traveller sites should not be allowed in the Green Belt (including “grey belt”).