Comment

Representation ID: 8187

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Stuart and Karen Prescott

SS 42
I&O_8676
I am writing to register my objection to the proposal to build a significant number of homes on the ancient woodlands at Hob Hey wood and the land on and adjacent to the allotments at the top of Langdale Way, Frodsham. Whilst I fully appreciate the push to build new homes, Frodsham simply does not have the infrastructure or the facilities to accommodate building new homes on this scale. Traffic concern  This particular area is accessible via one main road and one very narrow minor road. Neither could accommodate the traffic generated from building the homes, let alone the increase n traffic from hundreds of new home owners once occupied. As you know, most homes have a minimum of 2 cars but, as children get older, this usually increases. Frodsham already bottlenecks on a daily basis. Add a problem on the M56 into the mix and Frodsham becomes completely gridlocked. This is from all directions when people leave the M56 at junctions 10, 11 or 12 west bound or junction 14 east bound. As a resident of Frodsham for 28 years I can say we have gone from this happening on a monthly basis to 3 to 4 times a week. This area of the M56 is a hazard hotspot and it has an almost daily impact on Frodsham. We simply cannot accommodate an increase in the number of vehicles on our roads, due to the proposed building of these homes, either in the immediate location or in Frodsham generally. The swing bridge and the junction at Sutton Weaver, which is the key west bound route into Frodsham via junctions 11 and 12, is already at capacity and simply cannot take more traffic. A potential of a further 1300 plus cars on a daily basis would cause and add to the already existing chaos. Schools All primary schools are single form entry and are at capacity. The Manor would be the closest to the proposed scheme and would simply not have the capacity for the children or indeed cope with additional traffic for drop off. We have lost Frodsham High School so now only have Helsby High School, which again is at capacity, because it is a feeder school for all outlying villages as well as Frodsham and Helsby. Doctors surgeries Our GPs and nurses are already at capacity. The health centre is incredibly busy and it is often difficult to get an appointment. How do you expect it to cope with the influx of hundreds more families? Emergency services Frodsham has a significantly reduced fire service and the starion is now manned on a part time basis. It has a community Police base but not a dedicated Police station any more. There is hardly the capacity to address current needs. Flood risk and pressure on an already struggling fresh and waste water system Frodsham is already struggling. Our mains sewers are close to capacity. Every Autumn and Winter we have issues where the rain and run off water has no where to go but down our roads, contributing to surface breakdown and damage. We have United utilities working in the area on a very regular basis dealing with leaks and burst pipes because the pipe work system is aging and at capacity. Building this number of homes and connecting them to an already strained network of aging sewers and pipeworks is a recipe for disaster. Where will the run off water from all this construction go?  Also Frodsham is built on a natural sandstone seam. The destruction to the geology of the area could have a huge impact on the wider environment. Green spaces and ancient woodland Frodsham is a market town but surrounded by beautiful green spaces for  residents and visitors to enjoy and for the farmers to grow crops and use as pasture for livestock. We need land to be retained for agricultural and amenity/leisure use for our health and wellbeing and for the wellbeing of future generations. This proposed planning application will result in damage to the ecology of the area, affect wildlife corridors, and impact on air quality. It will also have a massive impact on light pollution and pollution from vehicles. Having at the same time destroyed the very woodland that helps protect us from the effects of such pollution. We have already lost vast amenity space due to the wind farms and now due to the proposed solar farms. How much more amenity space do you expect us to lose without destroying the very heart of the area. People move to Frodsham because of its close proximity to green spaces. If they wanted to move to a city they would do so. We are very proudly a market town which still feels like a village. Viability In the neighbouring village of Helsby a redevelopment at the edge of the village failed twice due to bankruptcy of the developers. Even Homes England couldn’t get the project up and running. It has now been progressed by a third developer, working with another developer in conjunction with Homes England at a smaller part of the site. This area was a brownfield site and is ideal for the type of construction proposed, although this too will have an impact on Helsby High School. Frodsham just simply does not have any similar brownfield sites or the capacity for redevelopment Our geology and geographical location cannot accommodate building homes on this scale. Please acknowledge receipt of this objection and confirm it will be registered against the proposal. I await hearing from you.

Comment

Representation ID: 8190

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Dr Henry Finch

I&O_8679
FR001 , east of the town, has relatively remote access from the town centre / High Street via Blue Hatch / London Road, Fluin Lane and Langdale Way (north) and Townfield Lane (south).   There is a two-hourly bus service shared with FR002.  Environmental loss at Hob Hey and Bradley Orchard would be severe. FR002 , two miles south of the town, includes a main road, Kingsley Road B5152. This road is extremely busy as Frodsham’s only link to the south with heavy traffic, some of which by-passes the town en route from / to the M56 Jct 12. The other boundaries of FR002 appear to be Bradley Lane in the north and Watery Lane to the east and south. Nearly all FR002 is cultivated arable land adjacent to B5152 with pasture for livestock beyond.  The environmental value to walkers of FR002 is exceptional with iconic views across the farmland to the Pennines.

Comment

Representation ID: 8199

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Catrin Jones

SS42
I&O_8688
To whom is may concern, My name is XXX, I live in XXX, In Frodsham. I’m writing to state my objections to the proposed building on the land by hob hey wood, an ancient woodland. I appreciate the housing crisis is taxing for our local area, but let’s be real these houses won’t be affordable for the young people of Frodsham to buy anyway. I am objecting to policies: SS41, SS42 and SS43. Thanks for your time,

Comment

Representation ID: 8202

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Andrew Helliwell

I&O_8691
Townfield Lane is situated very close to the land where the new homes are proposed, and the development would have a significant impact on my daily life. At present, it is a quiet and peaceful area, but the increase in traffic would bring noise and light pollution, and create congestion on local roads. This would particularly affect my daily commute in and out of Frodsham. My family and I also regularly walk around Hob Hey Wood, an ancient woodland at the end of our road. It is a treasured local space, home to a wide variety of wildlife, and I am very concerned that the development would cause lasting harm to this important natural environment. Frodsham itself is a small village with limited infrastructure. Additional housing on this scale would place unsustainable pressure on local services, including GPs, dentists and schools. My wife and I are planning to have children in the near future, and I want them to be able to attend local schools and grow up in a safe, quiet village with a strong sense of community. Finally, I am worried that such a development would make the area less desirable, leading to a decline in local house prices. Please could you reconsider the plan to build these new homes, in light of the concerns raised.

Comment

Representation ID: 8214

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Eleanor Helliwell

I&O_8703
Townfield Lane is situated very close to the land where the new homes are proposed, and the development would have a significant impact on my daily life. At present, it is a quiet and peaceful area, but the increase in traffic would bring noise and light pollution, and create congestion on local roads. This would particularly affect my daily commute in and out of Frodsham. My family and I also regularly walk around Hob Hey Wood, an ancient woodland at the end of our road. It is a treasured local space, home to a wide variety of wildlife, and I am very concerned that the development would cause lasting harm to this important natural environment. Frodsham itself is a small village with limited infrastructure. Additional housing on this scale would place unsustainable pressure on local services, including GPs, dentists and schools. My wife and I are planning to have children in the near future, and I want them to be able to attend local schools and grow up in a safe, quiet village with a strong sense of community. Finally, I am worried that such a development would make the area less desirable, leading to a decline in local house prices. Please could you reconsider the plan to build these new homes, in light of the concerns raised.

Comment

Representation ID: 8229

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Joe Laughton

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_8718
I strongly object to the proposed development on Green Belt land next to Hob Hey Wood (policies SS41, SS42, SS43, FR001, FR002). It would destroy wildlife corridors, damage ancient woodland, increase flood risk, worsen traffic and air pollution, and put more strain on local services, for example. It would also erode valuable community green space and the character of Frodsham’s countryside. Please reject this proposal in full.

Comment

Representation ID: 8232

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: John Gascoyne

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_8721
The proposals for these two areas of Frodsham will both be highly damaging to the local woodland - Hob Hey Wood.  This ancient semi natural wood is one of the most important and biodiverse sites in Cheshire and MUST be protected. New housing developments will bring severe problems including drainage, light pollution overuse and potential misuse/vandalism from the close proximity of the housing. Additionally the loss of farmland hedges and trees will reduce and disrupt the habitats around the wood which are equally important for the health of this nature rich gem. I strongly oppose this plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 8267

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: M and P Jones

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_8756
FROD1 and 2 suffers from poor access and comprises quality BMV FROD3 appears the most logical

Comment

Representation ID: 8273

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Tildsley

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_8762
I strongly object to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. Just 2.5% of the UK is now covered in ancient woodland. Option C, which is concerned with greater development in rail connected settlements would almost double the population of the town! How can this be appropriate and how is this sustainable in terms of an infrastructure which is already struggling to cope? I note that you mentioned completing an infrastructure development plan IDP in due course but the time to consider the infrastructure in my view is before putting forward an option. The suggested number of houses would mean at least one more primary school would be required and put more pressure on Helsby High School which already will have to cope with the extra housing estate already being built in Helsby. Is another high school being considered? It goes without saying that extra doctors and dentists will be needed. Hob Hey Wood is a site of biological interest and ancient woodland; Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site irecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. Statistics say that over 70% of ancient woodland has already been lost. These carbon catching areas must be preserved. The wood is not only a haven for wildlife but also for local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. This is supported in Mind’s Nature and Mental Health Report. Hob Hey Wood is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment and the wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive and building here would destroy that forever. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. We know that surface water flooding is a huge issue in England today over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the greenland around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 would mean that water would run off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. We already have sink holes appearing in the town. The councils own flood risk assessment warns against removing natural barriers. Incidents from the late nineties to 2005 have been the subject of a campaign involving both the council and United utilities resulting in excavation and the installation of huge tanks. House building could result in these issues rising again. I used to live on Langdale Way and remember when flooding occurred there in the early 2000’s and huge tanks had to be installed under the school carpark. The proposed building will only exacerbate the situation.

Comment

Representation ID: 8299

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Sue Benson

SS42
I&O_8788
FRO01 and FRO02 are unsuitable for development due to a number of factors: FRO01 and FRO02 are wildlife corridors in close proximity to Hob Hey Wood, an area of Ancient Woodland and a Site of Biological interest with more than 800 species, many of them rare, including bats. Hob Hey Wood is protected by the Woodland Trust and close to the Mersey Forest. Any developments in this area of Frodsham would clearly impact this and must not be allowed to happen. This area is enjoyed for recreation by walkers and dog walkers. An increase in both, especially dogs, would have a negative impact on the wildlife living here and reduce the quality of the natural environment. Forest-bathing and other outdoor activities are well documented as being vital for physical and mental health and contribute to the general wellbeing of residents and visitors. This area is also home to Townfield Allotments, a thriving vibrant community of over 82 active allotments. As well as growing food, the allotments site provides a great community amenity for plot holders and their families to enjoy. This undoubtedly contributes to community cohesion and good mental and physical health within Frodsham as well as providing freshly and sustainably grown produce for plot holders’ families, friends and the wider community. There is also a memorial orchard. The Allotment Society holds an open day each year where the local community can meet and enjoy the site and its produce. Schools, scouts, artists and other community groups visit throughout the year and enjoy this valuable registered community asset and there is a wellbeing plot tended by Petty Pool for the benefit of their service users. Beekeepers have their bees on the site, and this a haven for pollinators within the Weaver Valley. Although FRO01 and FRO02 seem to be in relatively close proximity to the station and town centre, they are over the top of a very steep hill and very few people walk or cycle here, relying on cars to travel up and down to and from Frodsham centre. Anyone living in new developments in this area would not be walking or cycling to the town and its amenities. The car parking in the town is very often full, so there is no capacity for more cars or parking areas. Train services to Liverpool and Manchester are poor and overcrowded. Access to FRO1 and FRO02 are very poor. Langdale Way is a residential road passing a junior school and feeding into Fluin Lane which is already a bottleneck where it joins the A56. This is dangerous double box junction. Alternative access would be via Ellis Lane, a track, which is on a dangerous bend and would necessitate major new road building. This would put further pressure on the Weaver Valley, an area which has been recognised as being of significant environmental importance. Another access route is Bradley Lane which is also a quiet residential road and totally unsuitable for high levels of traffic. Townfield Lane would potentially be an access route, but this is already an over-busy rat-run and is very congested with parked cars with vehicles struggling to pass. Any more traffic in this area or on the nearby B5152 which links the area to the town centre would lead to an unmanageable level of gridlock. A number of sites for housing development were identified in the Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan, so these should be the first places that are considered rather than precious greenbelt which will be lost forever. Building houses on these areas would damage the rural characteristics of Frodsham, the Weaver Valley and Ancient Woodland. Any developments in this green belt and designated area of open countryside on FRO01 and FRO02 would cause permanent harm to the character of the area and must not go ahead.

Comment

Representation ID: 8308

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Samantha Chiffers

I&O_8797
This is to confirm that we strongly object to the following planning proposals:   SS42

Comment

Representation ID: 8326

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Patrick Cullen

SS42
I&O_8815
Good evening, I'm a resident in Frodsham (XXX) and I am objecting to policies SS41, SS42 and SS43. Kind regards

Comment

Representation ID: 8341

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Nicky Jones

I&O_8830
Flood Risk – FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03 act as natural drainage land. Removing them will increase surface water flooding to nearby homes, including mine. Frodsham already has a history of flooding (e.g. Langdale Way), and these fields are essential in preventing repeat incidents. Traffic & Congestion – The A56, Kingsley Road, and surrounding routes are already heavily congested, especially when the M56 is closed. Hundreds of additional vehicles from these sites will worsen gridlock and make it harder for emergency vehicles to get through, endangering lives. Pressure on Local Services – GPs, dentists, and schools in Frodsham are already oversubscribed. New housing on FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03 would overwhelm these services, with no improvements planned. Environmental Harm – Hob Hey Wood is an ancient woodland and a Site of Biological Interest. FRO01 and FRO02 form vital wildlife corridors connecting to the wood, while FRO03 would create a huge conurbation between Frodsham and Helsby. These developments would sever habitats permanently, destroying biodiversity. Air Quality & Light Pollution – Increased traffic and large-scale development will damage both human health and wildlife. Loss of Rural Buffer & Character – These sites form part of Frodsham’s Green Belt and countryside setting. Development here would permanently erode the town’s rural identity, reduce house values, and take away much-loved green space. For these reasons, I urge the Council to remove sites FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03 from the Local Plan. Building here is unsustainable, unjustified, and in direct conflict with Green Belt policy.

Comment

Representation ID: 8352

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Helen London

SS42
I&O_8841
I am writing to strongly object to the following proposed developments of Frodsham as identified in the local plan: Proposed development: FRO01 Proposed development: FRO02 Proposed development: FRO03 I am responding to questions SS41, SS42, SS43 on the consultation document. All 3 areas identified namely, (FRO01, FRO02 and FRO03) are all completely unsuitable for development for the following reasons: The proposed developments are in addition to the preceding development for 91 homes on the A56 opposite Castle Park plus also the plans to infill brown field plots within the exceeding town area. The proposed developments will add pressure to an already failing infrastructure.  There will be yet more gridlock on Frodsham roads.  Traffic in Frodsham (especially on the A56) is frequently very heavy at peak times.  In addition, roads are gridlocked when there is a traffic accident or heavy traffic on the M56. Thus compromising the free access/egress of emergency vehicles into Frodsham.  The A56, adjacent to the planned development opposite Castle Park, will become highly unsuitable for bicycles as it will pose an  increased risk for cyclists.   Trains in and out of Frodsham are often over crowded.  There will be strain on GPs, dentists and all schools (primary, Helsby High School as well as the special educational provision). There will be worse air quality and an increased risk of light pollution. There will be increased risk of flooding.  There will be significant destruction of wildlife corridors. There will be damage to ancient woodland. There will be a loss of community and green space areas.  Sports, recreation and community facilities will be oversubscribed, therefore compromising the health and wellbeing of residents.  Frodsham's Green Belt land must be protected.  Hob Hey Wood, our wildlife and our rural buffer must be protected.

Comment

Representation ID: 8376

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Rebecca Lane

FRO01 & FRO02
I&O_8867
 Dear Planning Policy Team, I am writing as a local resident of Frodsham to submit a formal objection to the inclusion of Green Belt sites FRO01 and FRO02 in the draft Local Plan (Regulation 18 – Issues & Options 2025) . I urge the Council to reconsider these allocations, on the basis of conflicts with national policy , lack of exceptional circumstances , and harm to the local environment, infrastructure, and community sustainability . ❌ Conflict with National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) According to NPPF 2023 (Para. 140–149) , Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances , through the Local Plan review process. However: No clear or robust evidence of exceptional circumstances has been provided to justify the release of FRO01 and FRO02 from Green Belt designation. The Council is required to fully exhaust brownfield and non-Green Belt options before considering Green Belt release. Evidence in the Issues & Options documents does not demonstrate that these have been adequately explored. The harm to openness, permanence, and countryside character caused by development of FRO01 and FRO02 is not outweighed by identified need. This makes the proposals non-compliant with national policy . � Inconsistency with Local Plan Spatial Strategy (SS41–SS47) The proposals contradict the Council’s stated aim of directing development to sustainable locations , close to jobs, services, and public transport (SS41). Frodsham has limited capacity in terms of school places, road infrastructure, healthcare, and public services. Adding hundreds of dwellings in this location will exacerbate existing strains on infrastructure (SS42). FRO01 and FRO02 are disconnected from key local services , leading to increased car dependency – undermining the Plan’s sustainability goals (SS45). � Environmental Harm and Loss of Landscape Character These sites provide a critical Green Belt buffer between Frodsham and the surrounding countryside. Their loss would cause irreversible harm to the rural setting and views from the Sandstone Ridge and surrounding footpaths. Both FRO01 and FRO02 are important for biodiversity, carbon capture, and flood mitigation . Their development risks degrading local ecosystems. Development here may increase flood risk , particularly given Frodsham’s proximity to the River Weaver and lower-lying areas downstream. � Legal Precedent and Planning Appeal Risks Councils across England have faced successful legal challenges and planning appeal defeats where Green Belt releases were not clearly justified (e.g., Compton PC v Guildford BC [2019], and others). Proceeding with these allocations may expose Cheshire West and Chester Council to legal and procedural risks unless it can robustly evidence exceptional circumstances and defend them at Examination. ✅ Reasonable Alternatives Exist The Council must consider realistic alternatives , including: Higher densities in existing urban areas. Brownfield land regeneration. Prioritising allocations near transport corridors with lower environmental impact. These options are more aligned with sustainability objectives , and are less damaging to valued Green Belt land . � Unscrupulous purchasers The houses on this site will no doubt be purchased by wealthy investors who’s sole aim is to rent these out to those who were either unable to afford the purchase price, or those who had difficulty securing a mortgage once they were released.  Conclusion For all the reasons outlined above—legal, environmental, spatial, and procedural—I strongly object to the proposed development of FRO01 and FRO02. I urge the Council to: Remove both sites from the list of potential allocations. Recommit to the protection of Green Belt land in accordance with national and local policy. Redirect housing delivery toward genuinely sustainable, evidence-based solutions .

Comment

Representation ID: 8378

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Andrei Spanu

I&O_8869
We are deeply concerned that further overpopulation in this area will have a detrimental impact on both our daily lives and the well-being of our community. The existing infrastructure is already under strain, with narrow roads struggling to accommodate current traffic levels, and the increase in vehicles will inevitably bring more congestion, noise, and pollution. Our quiet neighbourhood, valued for its character and tranquillity, would suffer significant decline. In addition, the limited local amenities already present challenges, which would only be worsened by the increased demand. This level of development risks undermining the safety, quality of life, and cohesion of the community we have built here. We understand the need for new housing, but surely there are other, more suitable areas where the infrastructure can support it. For these reasons, I strongly object to any further development around Townfield Lane.

Comment

Representation ID: 8384

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Lesley Mitchell

SS42
I&O_8875
Hi I’m XXX of XXX and I’d like it to be registered that I’m objecting to policies SS41, SS42, and SS43 I’ve lived in Frodsham for over 40 years and regularly walk in Hob Hey Wood and the surrounding areas. I strongly object to the proposed development of homes on the protected Green Belt land next to Hob Hey Wood. I’m concerned about: Damage to the Ancient Woodland and the rare species that live there Destruction of vital Wildlife Corridors Loss of Community and Green Space important for fitness, relaxation and mental health Worse air quality and increased light and noise pollution Increased flood risk More gridlock on Frodsham roads More strain on our GP’s, dentists and schools I say NO to FRO01 and FRO02 Regards

Comment

Representation ID: 8390

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Rob and Robert Cowell

SS42
I&O_8881
I wish to object to the above proposals as adding these properties to would put a strain on local facilities eg, doctors, dentists, schools etc. It would also hugely affect Hob Hey wood and the damage this would cause to the wildlife that currently inhibit this area.

Comment

Representation ID: 8402

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Jackie Cottrell

SS42
I&O_8893
The proposal to build 500 homes on the above is ludicrous. There is no infrastructure for this development in terms of roads and vehicular access, it will destroy valuable green belt land and will negatively impact on the lives of current residents in the area for many years to come, notwithstanding the damage to wildlife and the destruction of the countryside just for profit. It simply is not viable!. I strongly object to SS41 SS42 SS43

Comment

Representation ID: 8410

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Gina Kerry

SS42
I&O_8901
Hi We are objecting to policies SS41,SS42 and SS43 in regards to building homes on protected green belt land  – this proposal is threatening our beautiful countryside -what we have left

Comment

Representation ID: 8435

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Hugh Benson

I&O_8926
FRO01 and FRO02 are unsuitable for development due to a number of factors: FRO01 and FRO02 are wildlife corridors in close proximity to Hob Hey Wood, an area of Ancient Woodland and a Site of Biological interest with more than 800 species, many of them rare, including bats. Hob Hey Wood is protected by the Woodland Trust and close to the Mersey Forest. Any developments in this area of Frodsham would clearly impact this and must not be allowed to happen. This area is enjoyed for recreation by walkers and dog walkers. An increase in both, especially dogs, would have a negative impact on the wildlife living here and reduce the quality of the natural environment. Forest-bathing and other outdoor activities are well documented as being vital for physical and mental health and contribute to the general wellbeing of residents and visitors. This area is also home to Townfield Allotments, a thriving vibrant community of over 82 active allotments. As well as growing food, the allotments site provides a great community amenity for plot holders and their families to enjoy. This undoubtedly contributes to community cohesion and good mental and physical health within Frodsham as well as providing freshly and sustainably grown produce for plot holders’ families, friends and the wider community. There is also a memorial orchard. The Allotment Society holds an open day each year where the local community can meet and enjoy the site and its produce. Schools, scouts, artists and other community groups visit throughout the year and enjoy this valuable registered community asset and there is a wellbeing plot tended by Petty Pool for the benefit of their service users. Beekeepers have their bees on the site, and this a haven for pollinators within the Weaver Valley. Although FRO01 and FRO02 seem to be in relatively close proximity to the station and town centre, they are over the top of a very steep hill and very few people walk or cycle here, relying on cars to travel up and down to and from Frodsham centre. Anyone living in new developments in this area would not be walking or cycling to the town and its amenities. The car parking in the town is very often full, so there is no capacity for more cars or parking areas. Train services to Liverpool and Manchester are poor and overcrowded. Access to FRO1 and FRO02 are very poor. Langdale Way is a residential road passing a junior school and feeding into Fluin Lane which is already a bottleneck where it joins the A56. This is dangerous double box junction. Alternative access would be via Ellis Lane, a track, which is on a dangerous bend and would necessitate major new road building. This would put further pressure on the Weaver Valley, an area which has been recognised as being of significant environmental importance. Another access route is Bradley Lane which is also a quiet residential road and totally unsuitable for high levels of traffic. Townfield Lane would potentially be an access route, but this is already an over-busy rat-run and is very congested with parked cars with vehicles struggling to pass. Any more traffic in this area or on the nearby B5152 which links the area to the town centre would lead to an unmanageable level of gridlock. A number of sites for housing development were identified in the Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan, so these should be the first places that are considered rather than precious greenbelt which will be lost forever. Building houses on these areas would damage the rural characteristics of Frodsham, the Weaver Valley and Ancient Woodland. Any developments in this green belt and designated area of open countryside on FRO01 and FRO02 would cause permanent harm to the character of the area and must not go ahead.

Comment

Representation ID: 8436

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: iain Bennett

SS42
I&O_8927
I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of over 1,300 houses in the areas designated as FRO01 and FRO02 in your Local Plan consultation. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning that ignores fundamental principles of sustainable development and environmental protection.   Wildlife Corridors and Ancient Woodland The proposed development sites, FRO01 and FRO02, are not isolated parcels of land. They are part of a crucial wildlife corridor that connects and supports the ancient woodland of Hob Hey Wood. Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest, an irreplaceable and highly biodiverse ecosystem that is home to thousands of species. Building on this land would sever these vital connections, isolating the woodland and leading to a significant decline in its biodiversity. Once these habitats are destroyed, they cannot be replaced. The Planning Inspectorate recognizes the importance of these corridors, and this proposal flies in the face of established ecological planning principles.   Green Belt Policy and Flood Risk The areas in question are part of the protected Green Belt, a policy designed to prevent urban sprawl and preserve the open character of land. The proposed development directly contravenes this policy by building on land that acts as Frodsham's rural buffer. Furthermore, the land’s permeable nature is critical for managing flood risk. The Hob Hey Wood area acts as a natural sponge, absorbing rainwater and slowing surface runoff. The council's own Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) highlights the importance of these natural flood defenses. Paving over FRO01 and FRO02 would increase the speed and volume of runoff, putting existing homes at greater risk of devastating surface water flooding.   Infrastructure Strain Frodsham's infrastructure is already struggling. Our roads, particularly the A56, are frequently gridlocked. Adding hundreds of new houses would introduce hundreds of extra vehicles, further overwhelming the road network. This would not only worsen congestion but could also slow emergency services, potentially putting lives at risk. The strain on public services is equally dire, as there is no spare capacity in our local GP practices and schools. The addition of a large population without a corresponding increase in infrastructure would result in a decline in the quality of these essential services for all residents.   Loss of Property Value The proposed development also poses a direct financial threat to existing homeowners in Frodsham. A key reason people choose to live here is for its access to open countryside and green views. The development on FRO01 and FRO02 would effectively strip away this rural buffer, fundamentally altering the character of the area. A large-scale development that introduces more traffic, noise, and light pollution will diminish the very features that give homes in this area their worth. The developers will profit from building on this land, but existing residents will be left to face lower resale values and a loss of the peaceful environment they were sold on.   Air Quality and Light Pollution Frodsham is already within an Air Quality Management Area due to existing high levels of pollutants. The addition of hundreds of new cars will inevitably worsen air pollution, posing a direct risk to the health of all residents. Furthermore, the introduction of widespread lighting from new houses and streets will cause significant light pollution. This is not just a nuisance; it is a serious ecological threat that disrupts the natural behaviour of nocturnal wildlife, particularly bats and moths, both of which are present in Hob Hey Wood.   Antisocial Behaviour and Lack of Community Cohesion The proposed development fails to meet the fundamental requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which states that new growth should support community cohesion. By isolating new homes on the edge of town without integrated public services or social infrastructure, this proposal risks creating a disconnected community. Such estates can become under-supported and under-policed, leading to social fragmentation and a potential increase in antisocial behaviour. This approach is detrimental to both the new and existing residents and fails to create a unified, thriving community. Conclusion For all the reasons outlined above, I believe that the proposed development on Green Belt sites FRO01 and FRO02 is not sustainable, not justified, and not acceptable. My objection is a formal response to consultation questions SS41, SS42, and SS43. I urge you to remove these sites from the Local Plan immediately.

Comment

Representation ID: 8446

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Gerrard

I&O_8937
I wish to register my objections, in the strongest possible terms, to the proposal to build homes on protected Green Belt land adjacent to Hob Hey Wood, Frodsham (policies SS41, SS42, SS43). Much of Hob Hey Wood is ancient woodland and forms an important habitat for wildlife, flora and many rare species. It forms an important, irreplaceable oasis of beauty, calm and solitude within our County. I've known and loved the woodland since I was a child and always found it a place of retreat and comfort at any time. I've lived in the area of Bradley Lane, Frodsham all my life and seen much change and development in Frodsham down the years but this, I consider, a step too far. This proposed development would lead to: Damage to Ancient Woodland and harm to the wildlife. Destruction of important wildlife corridors. Loss of green space. More gridlock on Frodsham Roads. Poorer air quality and worsening of light pollution. Strain on local infrastructure including GP's, dentists and schools. Possible increased flood risk. Falling house prices. I sincerely hope that these proposals will be reconsidered.  

Comment

Representation ID: 8451

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Steve King

SS42
I&O_8942
Dear all  As a local resident I wish to object in the strongest possible terms to the above polices and the concept of building many new houses on this essentially Green Belt Land. This would be completely contrary to the interests of local residents and beggars the question of the local countryside and infrastructure being able to properly enable such a ludicrous level of development in the absence of obvious local  need for it . My primary reasons for the objection are as follows:   Inability of the local infrastructure to support such a development (roads, schools, GP's, dentists etc, surface water drainage and sewage control and management) Loss of a vital part of our local green space and countryside, and likely impacts on wildlife in a protected Green Belt area Damage to the fabric of local community Severe damage to the reputation of the Council and its application of policies to support and protect its council tax paying residents in the face of ludicrous, unwarranted and unsustainable governmental housing targets

Comment

Representation ID: 8471

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Robert Swift

SS42
I&O_8962
I am formally objecting to the policies SS41, SS42, SS43. I am extremely worried about infrastructure of the town. The roads already become gridlocked at peak times. Schools are already incredibly competitive and we have to wait months to get a doctor when we moved here. These houses can not be built without serious investment in the local area for schools, doctors, parks, gyms, and more. Regardless, I'd hate to lose the amazing countryside that border Frodsham because of more houses.

Comment

Representation ID: 8489

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Dorothea Moreland

I&O_8980
I object to the above policies on many grounds. Main ones being extra traffic ( Frodsham is a nightmare when the M56 is closed between J12 and 14 - not a one off occasion ! ) , parking, definitely strain on GP’s, dentists, and destruction around Hob Hey wood.

Comment

Representation ID: 8490

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Ann Slater

SS42
I&O_8981
I strongly disagree that buildings should be built on policies SS41 ,SS42,SS43 , I moved to Frodsham 22 years ago with four children. I moved from a built up area which was not good for them .my children now have their own business. I have many happy times with them in hob hey wood .my children had never seen a pheasant. Mole, never seen a wood before and what lives there  .plus the traffic is bad enough in Frodsham. Please don't put buildings near the woods it will kill the wildlife off.

Comment

Representation ID: 8495

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: A-M, WR and AJA Posnett

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_8986
FROD1 and 2 suffers from poor access and comprises quality BMV FROD3 appears the most logical

Comment

Representation ID: 8504

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Michelle Riches

FRO01 & FRO02
I&O_8995
I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of sites FRO01 and FRO02 in Frodsham. These areas fall within the Green Belt and border Hob Hey Wood, an irreplaceable area of ancient woodland and a valued community green space. I believe the proposals are unsound, unsustainable, and contrary to both local and national planning policy, for the following reasons: Green Belt Protection The sites fall within the Green Belt. National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) paragraphs 137–140 make clear that Green Belt can only be released in exceptional circumstances. No such circumstances have been demonstrated here. Development would undermine the permanence of the Green Belt, contribute to urban sprawl, and set a damaging precedent. Unjustified Housing Targets and Alternative Land Supply The housing targets underpinning the Local Plan are significantly higher than ONS household growth projections, and therefore unjustified. Development should prioritise brownfield land and vacant industrial sites within existing settlements, not productive agricultural or Green Belt land. Much of FRO01 and FRO02 comprises best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1–3A) that should be protected. Traffic Congestion and Highway Safety Frodsham already experiences severe congestion, particularly when the M56 is closed, when traffic is diverted through the town. A 2022 Highways England report showed traffic increases of 22% during such closures, impacting emergency vehicle access. Additional residential and construction traffic would worsen safety and congestion on already pressured roads such as the A56 and B5152. Cheshire Fire and Rescue have previously raised concerns about response times during peak events. As a resident of Ennerdale Drive, I can confirm that several times a year the road becomes completely gridlocked with stationary traffic. Although it is normally a very quiet residential street, it is heavily impacted during motorway incidents or local highway works when vehicles are diverted through the town. At peak times – particularly during school drop-off and pick-up at Manor House School – congestion at the exit from the Lakes Estate (Langdale onto Fluin Lane) routinely causes delays of 15 minutes or more. Any further housing on the proposed sites would significantly worsen these already unsustainable traffic pressures. Strain on Local Infrastructure and Services Local services are already overstretched: GP and dental access in Cheshire West are below national averages, with local surgeries facing delays and NHS dentists not taking new patients. Local schools, including Helsby High, are near capacity with no expansion plans. Without significant up-front investment, new housing would place unsustainable strain on health, education, and public services. Flood Risk, Drainage, and Sewage Capacity The proposed development would replace permeable land with hard surfaces, increasing runoff, surface water flooding, and sewer overload. Residents recall repeated sewer flooding in Langdale Way in the late 1990s–2000s, which required major intervention by United Utilities. Building on adjacent land risks a repeat of these problems. Biodiversity, Ancient Woodland, and Wildlife Corridors Hob Hey Wood is a designated Site of Biological Interest and an irreplaceable ancient woodland, home to over 800 recorded species, including nationally rare and locally scarce wildlife. Development on FRO01 and FRO02 threatens: Wildlife Corridors: Hedgerows and green links vital for species movement. Pollution: Runoff, vehicle emissions, and light pollution would degrade habitats. Disturbance: Increased human and pet activity would disrupt sensitive species, including bats (seven species recorded, including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle) and invertebrates. Once lost, ancient woodland cannot be replaced, making this a direct conflict with NPPF policy to protect irreplaceable habitats. Loss of Community Green Space Hob Hey Wood and its surrounding fields are widely used by local residents for recreation, walking, and wellbeing. Studies consistently show that access to natural green space improves physical and mental health. Development here would permanently reduce the availability of safe, accessible green space for the community. Unsustainable Spatial Strategy CWAC’s strategy of concentrating growth around railway stations ignores the inadequacy of the local transport network. Trains to major cities are infrequent and overcrowded, while local roads are not designed for cycling or increased car use. This approach is unrealistic and contrary to the NPPF’s requirement that development be sustainable both environmentally and socially. Conflict with Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan The Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan, a legally significant local policy, prioritises the protection of green spaces, enhancement of biodiversity, and management of traffic. Development of FRO01 and FRO02 conflicts with these aims and should therefore be refused. Concerns About the Consultation Process Residents who attended the CWAC consultation Q&A session in Winsford reported deeply concerning levels of unpreparedness and misinformation: Staff appeared unaware of the true location, biodiversity value, and ancient woodland status of Hob Hey. Hedgerows, ponds, tree preservation orders, and flood risks were not acknowledged. The decision to hold the Q&A in Winsford, away from Frodsham residents most directly affected, limited local engagement. This raises serious questions about the adequacy and transparency of the consultation process. At best, it suggests a lack of due diligence; at worst, it implies an attempt to minimise local scrutiny of unsuitable site allocations. Either way, this undermines public confidence and should be taken into account when considering the soundness of the Local Plan. Conclusion The proposed development of FRO01 and FRO02 is unsound and contrary to multiple provisions of the NPPF and the Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan. It would cause unacceptable harm to the Green Belt, biodiversity, ancient woodland, flood resilience, local infrastructure, and community wellbeing. For these reasons, I strongly urge that the application be refused and that development be redirected towards brownfield sites within existing settlements.

Comment

Representation ID: 8512

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Dan Thompson

SS42
I&O_9003
Dear Sir / Madam I write to object to the building of land next to Hob Hey or Hobby Wood as I have known it to be called all my life The policy numbers in this case are SS41 SS42 SS43 I write to register my objection to these policies I object because the areas proposed for development are all on areas designated as greenbelt land Greenbelt, this a highly important designation for land as it provides open space, protect natural habitats, prevents urban sprawl. Greenbelt act as natural buffers during wildfires that, in my opinion are going to become more common as the summers become warmer. They help provide essential groundwater during droughts and help off set global climate change as they store carbon dioxide. Greenbelt policies were designed to preserve remaining green areas for the benefit of human and animal life. I object to the development of this greenbelt as the local infrastructure is already under stress, Townfield Lane develops new pot holes regally leading to damage to vehicles and housing foundations. Whenever the M 56 is closed for any reason the local roads become gridlocked sometimes for many hours leading to increased air pollution and this will increase to intolerable levels if this development is granted planning permission If these policies are given permission there will be an increase in local noise levels and air and water pollution, this area has ancient woodland and wildlife which will both be harmed by development in this area. The local GP surgery and chemists struggle to cope with the numbers in the area currently and this will be further impacted. There are many areas such as near land adjacent to Gleeves garden centre more suited to development