Comment

Representation ID: 184

Received: 15/07/2025

Respondent: Richard Cannon

I&O_207
There are significant concerns regarding the current proposals for housing development in Frodsham. The existing Frodsham town plan calls for 250 new houses. However, the newly identified potential growth areas could accommodate up to 2,000 additional houses—representing a dramatic increase over previous plans. Frodsham currently has a population of approximately 9,000. The construction of 2,000 new homes could lead to a population rise of more than 50%, fundamentally changing the character and scale of the town. The proposed release of green belt land around Frodsham does not meet the "very special circumstances" requirement set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Development on such a substantial scale, even if limited to one of the suggested growth areas, risks significant urban sprawl and would undermine the historic character and setting of the town. The purported benefits of these growth areas and their associated housing numbers are overstated and not unique to green belt sites, especially considering that alternative, non-green belt locations are available. Furthermore, brownfield sites have not yet been fully explored, even within Frodsham itself. A critical issue with the proposed locations is the lack of provision for necessary infrastructure improvements. According to section 6.2 of the Frodsham town plan, the town is already limited to three primary access routes and frequently suffers from congestion, particularly during incidents on the nearby M56, which can leave Frodsham gridlocked. Each phase of development has brought increased road traffic volumes—an issue acknowledged in the town plan. The proposed sites would substantially increase the town's population, exacerbating congestion and associated pollution, which would pose a considerable problem for residents. Finally, there are no straightforward solutions for creating additional access routes into Frodsham. Without addressing these fundamental challenges, the scale of the proposed developments threatens the sustainability, heritage, and quality of life in the town.  

Comment

Representation ID: 215

Received: 17/07/2025

Respondent: Paul Hayes

SS42
I&O_244
F003 is the only site that could potentially be developed but it would only be possible with sigificant additional investment in the local road infrastructure. The A56 can't cope with the current leve of traffic. The M56 is prone to frequent accidents causing major congestion and disruption. The other sites would result in the destruction of wildlife habitats, the openess of the greenbelt area and also result in the town being overwhelmed with traffic.  

Comment

Representation ID: 253

Received: 17/07/2025

Respondent: Emma Malpeli

MAP 5.10
I&O_283
Those sites identifying the 250 new homes in the agreed Nov 24 neighbourhood plan are a starting point. Other brown and greyfield sites should be considered next, not greenfield.

Comment

Representation ID: 281

Received: 20/07/2025

Respondent: Derek Porter

I&O_311
Question SS42.  Option FRO01 is totally unsuitable for development.  This land is cherished green belt adjacent to ancient woodland (Hob Hey Wood) which I understand has protected status.  These fields are used daily for walking by many people who visit the wood, and home to wildlife including badger setts.  Within the region marked for potential development there is also a thriving allotment.  Road access to this area is also totally unsuitable for any new developments.  Access along Townfield Lane to the fields is restricted and subject to frequent jams due to the number of cars that park on the road, with a particular single-lane bottleneck where there are terraces on both sides of the road.  The latter part of Townfield Lane that is adjacent to the proposed site is only a narrow unpaved road at present and not suitable for expansion.  Access to Townfield Lane is possible from the Lakes Estate via Grasmere Road but again this is only a local access road to serve the estate and not designed to facilitate frequent two-way traffic. 

Comment

Representation ID: 284

Received: 20/07/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mercer

FRO01
I&O_314
All areas identified reduce green space that give Frodsham its rural charector and will be detrimental to the enjoyment of the village by existing residents. Area FR01 is only accessible through existing residential developments, passing school entrances or via single track roads. Development of this area would have significant safety impact interms of construction traffic and increased traffic accessing the future development. The infrastructure supporting the existing residential neighbourhoods surrounding FR01 would need significant improvement to accomadate development, again significanly impacting existing residents. Traffic congestion is already an issue in the town centre and on connecting roads along with associated air quality and parking issues, especially when M56 is conjested. All areas identified will rely on the existing road networks to support them. This will further impact on existing residents. 

Comment

Representation ID: 411

Received: 26/07/2025

Respondent: Ms Linda Smith

I&O_486
There are significant constraints associated with all 3 potential growth areas around Frodsham: 1500-2000 homes would result in a population increase of at least 40% which would lead to urban sprawl and a loss of distinctiveness and heritage value for the town and its surrounding countryside, with an associated adverse impact on the quality of life and health of residents.   Transport routes into and through Frodsham are already clogged at peak times and especially when traffic is diverted through the town from the motorway. The railway station has limited car parking space. A massive increase in population would only add to the strain felt by the current population, as well as increasing local atmospheric pollution and increasing the risk of vehicle accidents.  Each site would result in the loss of high-grade agricultural land.  The capacity of local schools and medical facilities would be inadequate for such a dramatic population increase.  It is already very difficult to get GP appointments within a reasonable timeframe! Would the current sewage treatment locations for Frodsham waste be able to cope with a 40%+ increase in volumes?.  There are a number of public rights of way (PROW) which run across areas 01, 02 and 03 providing an essential resource for the health and wellbeing of local people and visitors alike.  The urbanisation of these routes would adversely affect their character and dramatically reduce enjoyment for users. Frodsham 01 and 02 areas have an especially high density of PROW, including popular named routes (Eddisbury Way and North Cheshire Way routes).  Frodsham 01 would see development around the popular woodland and site of biological interest at Hob Hey Wood (the whole area is also subject to a Tree Preservation Order).  This woodland would almost certainly be adversely impacted by significant additional footfall from the new local residents, not to mention light and noise pollution impacts. The woodland would become an 'island' surrounded by houses, cutting off vital wildlife corridoes.  The current Local Plan and Sustainable Appraisal Objectives both highlight that development should be avoided on locations of high environmental value. Frodsham 02 - the spectacular views eastwards from Kingsley Road across the River Weaver valley and towards the Pennines would be obscured by new housing, changing the distinctiveness of the Fivecrosses area of the town.  Frodsham 03 - housing in this area represents significant sprawl towards Helsby, drastically reducing green space between the settlements.  If this was combined with development in Hel01 there would be no 'green' separation at all between Frodsham and Helsby.

Comment

Representation ID: 440

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Kieran Brady

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_522
1. This Development Must Not Go Ahead This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. 2. Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. Source: Hansard (UK Parliament), 2015 – https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-11-17/debates/15111754000002/M56(Junctions12To14) 3. Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/). 4. Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf 5. Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/07/dog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study 6. Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e 7. GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-control/local-plan/authority-monitoring-report 8. Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/pests-pollution-food-safety/pollution-and-air-quality/air-quality-review-and-assessment/action-plans/action-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004). 9. Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 10. House Prices Will Drop People buy in Frodsham for access to open countryside, peace, and green views. Strip those away, and the value drops. This development removes the very features that give existing homes their worth. Homeowners who’ve invested in the area will be hit with lower resale values and a loss of the rural edge they were sold on. Developers walk away with profit. Residents are left picking up the cost. 11. Greenbelt Is Not A Technicality The Greenbelt is there for a reason. Once you breach it, you set precedent for more erosion. This is not just about FRO01 or FRO02. It’s about what follows next if this goes ahead. National guidance is clear: development on Greenbelt land must be avoided unless there are absolutely no alternatives. In this case, there are alternatives. This land should remain untouched. Source: GOV.UK Greenbelt Guidance – ttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework/13-protecting-green-belt-land 12. Final Statement – Reject This Now This proposal is bad planning. It adds pressure to failing infrastructure. It increases flood risk. It destroys wildlife corridors. It worsens air quality. It lowers property values. It puts lives at risk. It benefits developers and damages communities. This is not sustainable. It is not justified. It is not acceptable. FRO01 and FRO02 must be removed from development plans entirely. This objection demands that the proposal be rejected in full. Nothing else will do.

Comment

Representation ID: 443

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Hannah Keeffe

I&O_526
1. This Development Must Not Go Ahead This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. 2. Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. Source: Hansard (UK Parliament), 2015 – https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-11-17/debates/15111754000002/M56(Junctions12To14) 3. Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/ ). 4. Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf 5. Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/07/dog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study 6. Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e 7. GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-control/local-plan/authority-monitoring-report 8. Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/pests-pollution-food-safety/pollution-and-air-quality/air-quality-review-and-assessment/action-plans/action-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004 ). 9. Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 10. House Prices Will Drop People buy in Frodsham for access to open countryside, peace, and green views. Strip those away, and the value drops. This development removes the very features that give existing homes their worth. Homeowners who’ve invested in the area will be hit with lower resale values and a loss of the rural edge they were sold on. Developers walk away with profit. Residents are left picking up the cost. 11. Greenbelt Is Not A Technicality The Greenbelt is there for a reason. Once you breach it, you set precedent for more erosion. This is not just about FRO01 or FRO02. It’s about what follows next if this goes ahead. National guidance is clear: development on Greenbelt land must be avoided unless there are absolutely no alternatives. In this case, there are alternatives. This land should remain untouched. Source: GOV.UK Greenbelt Guidance – ttps:// www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework/13-protecting-green-belt-land 12. Final Statement – Reject This Now This proposal is bad planning. It adds pressure to failing infrastructure. It increases flood risk. It destroys wildlife corridors. It worsens air quality. It lowers property values. It puts lives at risk. It benefits developers and damages communities. This is not sustainable. It is not justified. It is not acceptable. FRO01 and FRO02 must be removed from development plans entirely. This objection demands that the proposal be rejected in full. Nothing else will do.

Comment

Representation ID: 452

Received: 29/07/2025

Respondent: Matt Bill

I&O_535
1. This Development Must Not Go Ahead This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. 2. Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. Source: Hansard (UK Parliament), 2015 – https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-11-17/debates/15111754000002/M56(Junctions12To14) 3. Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/). 4. Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf 5. Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/.../dog-pee-and-poo-harming... 6. Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e 7. GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-control/local-plan/authority-monitoring-report 8. Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/pests-pollution-food-safety/pollution-and-air-quality/air-quality-review-and-assessment/action-plans/action-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004).   9. Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 10. House Prices Will Drop People buy in Frodsham for access to open countryside, peace, and green views. Strip those away, and the value drops. This development removes the very features that give existing homes their worth. Homeowners who’ve invested in the area will be hit with lower resale values and a loss of the rural edge they were sold on. Developers walk away with profit. Residents are left picking up the cost. 11. Greenbelt Is Not A Technicality The Greenbelt is there for a reason. Once you breach it, you set precedent for more erosion. This is not just about FRO01 or FRO02. It’s about what follows next if this goes ahead. National guidance is clear: development on Greenbelt land must be avoided unless there are absolutely no alternatives. In this case, there are alternatives. This land should remain untouched. Source: GOV.UK Greenbelt Guidance – ttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework/13-protecting-green-belt-land 12. Final Statement – Reject This Now This proposal is bad planning. It adds pressure to failing infrastructure. It increases flood risk. It destroys wildlife corridors. It worsens air quality. It lowers property values. It puts lives at risk. It benefits developers and damages communities. This is not sustainable. It is not justified. It is not acceptable. FRO01 and FRO02 must be removed from development plans entirely. This objection demands that the proposal be rejected in full. Nothing else will do.    

Comment

Representation ID: 463

Received: 17/07/2025

Respondent: Michael Nield

I&O_546
This is a response to the local plan for Frodsham regarding potential areas to build houses, the land which has been suggested in the plans FRO01,FRO02 and FRO03 are not suitable what so ever and will cause huge distribution to our local facilities, schools, doctors, dentist etc.  More importantly these area should be kept as green belt land and not be built on to protect our area and keep it desirable. The Frodsham neighbourhood plan identified areas that were possible to be built on and these 3 sites have been snuck on. More importantly areas FRO01 and FRO02 are near hob hey wood a protected area, open fields with flourishing wildlife and you suggest we build on it to ruin residents and wildlife’s quality of life. Our town could not cope with the amount of people and traffic that this could bring. Use the brownfield site identifies in the Frodsham neighbourhood plan, best of both worlds. 

Comment

Representation ID: 471

Received: 22/07/2025

Respondent: Neil & Valerie Rogers

I&O_554
We have registered on your website but were unable to find the correct area on your website to add comments on the proposed planning strategy for up to 3000 houses in Frodsham, options FRO02 & FRO03, so we are trying this email. Our comments/ questions as follows: -       Why hasn’t  this planning proposal been made general knowledge to everyone in the local Frodsham area? -       Hob Hey Wood  is an ancient woodland and ponds area with diverse wildlife including many active badger sets. -       This area also has multiple underground streams and waterways, which run under the surrounding fields and through the woods  A survey done in the past has highlighted this issue. -       Current road access in the Bradley Lane, Fairways area is very poor (tracks and narrow country roads) and new housing would create an extra unacceptable burden. -       Fields next to the River Weaver and the Weaver Canal are prone to flooding. Rain water run off from any new housing developments in to the River Weaver, especially in times of flooding, would be environmentally unacceptable. This also applies to run-off into the  streams in the Hob Hey Wood area. -       Frodsham already suffers badly from traffic congestion at peak times and also due to its proximity to the M56 & the swing bridge. -       The current schools are already at full capacity. -       The Doctor's surgery is at full capacity. Can you please advise as to when there are going to be public consultations held on these proposals and where?

Comment

Representation ID: 472

Received: 21/07/2025

Respondent: Graham Nixon

I&O_555
I'm lead to believe that planning permission is to be considered for some land off Townfield Lane in Frodsham. As a local resident I find this somewhat concerning. My first concern is for the ancient woodland of Hob Hay and the community orchards. The area identified is a haven and hunting ground for the many animals living in this local beauty spot. It saddens me that this area be considered for development and I would certainly object to this land being developed on before all brown belt land had been used. Another cause for concern is that the access to Townfield lane is very narrow. It's hard to image how the area would cope with additional vehicles. Schools are brimming, the health centre and nhs dentists are struggling too. If this land has been identified for development may I ask that the local community be made more aware and that a full and proper consultation take place. Frodsham may be in need of housing but a better solution is to encourage mature residents to downsize and free up family homes.

Comment

Representation ID: 474

Received: 23/07/2025

Respondent: Helen Harrison

I&O_557
I would like to register my extremely strong objection to proposed locations for housing developement on Green Belt land in the Frodsham area. I realise that councils are under pressure to build more housing. However building on Green Belt land, particularly land that has been farmed for generations, and wide open spaces is morally wrong. And destroying wildlife for profit is a heinous crime that should never be allowed. My concerens are particularly strong for proposed areas FRO01 Frodsham East and FRO02 Frodsham South. The openess of this area enhances, and is vital to, the character of the village. Just under thirteen percent of the England is Green Belt and this figure seems to be getting smaller by the day, will there be any nature left for future generations if we continue to massacre nature in this way? There is not the infrastructure in the village to support more houses in this area. One bus from Frodsham to Northwich every two hours is hardly sufficient public transport. Are there plans to build a school and a doctor's surgery? It is hard enough to get an appointment to see a doctor as it is, without adding more people into the equation. Local schools are at capacity now, education suffers if class sizes increase putting stress on teachers and pupils alike. The roads in the area are not equiped to take the volume of traffic that will come with a new estate.   Please consider very carefully before making this decision, once done it cannot be undone.

Comment

Representation ID: 475

Received: 24/07/2025

Respondent: Andrew & Donna Lewis

I&O_558
My Wife and I wish to raise an objection to the Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18) relating to the Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan, which proposes over-development of Frodsham onto Green belt land. We have lived on [redacted], Frodsham for 4 years. Having reviewed the (complicated) Consultation document, we wish to summarise our objections: Heritage and Character Preservation Objection: New developments will threaten the historic character and architectural integrity of Frodsham's market town identity. Concern: Certainly, the inappropriate scale of development will undermine the town's distinctive appearance and heritage assets. 2. Retail and Economic Adaptability Objection: Over-reliance on traditional retail models will not future-proof the declining town centre. The proposals will further reduce footfall into Frodsham, as the extra congestion caused will lead to visitors avoiding the Market Town completely. Concern: Insufficient support for independent traders or lack of flexibility in planning policy will hinder adaptation to changing shopping habits and the visitor economy. Green Space and Community Use Objection: Development on green spaces could reduce access to valued recreational and community areas, such as Hob Hey Wood and other valued green spaces. Concern: Loss of open space will negatively impact wellbeing, biodiversity, and community cohesion.  Traffic and Transport Objection: Increased development will certainly worsen existing traffic congestion, especially around Church Street & Main Street and the Fluin Lane junction. I see that a by-pass, requiring massive investment would be needed to prevent Frodsham coming to a complete grid-lock during rush hour or M56 incidents. Pollution from diesel & petrol vehicles will worsen. Concern: Without significant investment in sustainable transport (cycling, walking, rail), the town's infrastructure will be overwhelmed. Housing Needs Objection: The plan fails to address the real need for genuinely affordable housing for young people and families on brownfield land, partly due to Government Housebuilding policy. Concern: New housing will not meet local needs, especially for starter homes and older residents requiring accessible options.

Comment

Representation ID: 479

Received: 26/07/2025

Respondent: Joe Bell

I&O_562
I am a resident of Frodsham and strongly object to the plan to develop housing upon the beautiful green space of Bradley, as set out in 5.11 of the online consultation document. The area can barely stand current levels of traffic and is regularly gridlocked with small country lanes. Infrastructure cannot bear additional people - GP’s/services etc and the plan to destroy beautiful green spaces and wildlife habitat is beyond belief. Who dreams up these insane schemes to tarmac over our countryside? Without new services/amenities the area will become poorer, more congested and lead to social reaction.  This does not also comply with the National Planning Framework where green belt should only be used in ‘exceptional circumstances’. Also light pollution, noise, disturbance, pressure on ageing sewage systems, potential vandalism, litter, fires, wildlife choking and so on. This cannot go ahead. In summary. Housebuilding on green belt land (FRO01 and FRO02) would have serious detrimental effects for the town, its residents, and nature (specifically Hob Hey Wood). I do not believe that house building on FRO01 and FRO02 is a suitable solution for the demand for more houses and other areas should be chosen instead.

Comment

Representation ID: 480

Received: 26/07/2025

Respondent: Magdalena Kurowska Fray

I&O_563
Please stop taking our green areas. More houses more pressure on schools, doctors, dentists etc. It’s bad enough as it is. Please stop destroying wildlife. Some beautiful animals living around us. We want to breath fresh air and you’re continually destroying it. I’m against building new developments and probably everyone in Frodsham and surrounding areas. Regards, A very sad and disappointed Frodsham resident

Comment

Representation ID: 481

Received: 26/07/2025

Respondent: Jane Brady

I&O_564
My comments are specifically connected to the development of land on the Eastern side of Frodsham (areas FRO01 and FRO02 in your document) and to questions SS41, SS42 and SS43. NPPF : Does not comply with the National Planning Policy Framework. Paragraph 137–140 states that Green Belt land should only be developed in “exceptional circumstances.” Traffic : Without road improvements, Frodsham, already subject to severe congestion (especially during M56 problems), could be gridlocked often, increasing pollution levels. Emergency vehicles would struggle, putting lives at risk. Existing roads appear unsuitable to cope with construction traffic. Inadequate infrastructure: Services such as GPs, dentists, schools and social services are already stretched. Any increase in population without increased services would strain the services further. Sewage systems: Overpopulation intensifies surface drain issues in residential areas due to increased impermeable surfaces, overwhelming existing drainage systems and leading to flooding. The conversion of natural, permeable surfaces (e.g. fields), to concrete/tarmac, reduces rainwater absorption, causing more runoff and increased risk of surface water flooding. This occurs when drainage systems can't handle the volume of water, causing it to accumulate on the surface and potentially enter properties. Surface water runoff can carry pollutants into water bodies, impacting water quality and harming wildlife. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way. Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a yearlong disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again. Potential impact on property values: If development results in the problems listed above, it could impact residents’ property values. Impact on nature particularly Hob Hey Wood: Hob Hey is ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat which is being reduced every year. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Many species only occur in ancient woodland (so become rarer with each lost ancient wood). The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature (which are significant and scientifically proven). Building next to the wood could have catastrophic effects: Destruction of wildlife corridors. Wildlife relies on such routes (e.g. hedgerows) to move between areas. If destroyed (say, by a housing development) the wildlife becomes trapped and could decline. Hedgerows are themselves invaluable wildlife sites for nesting birds and animals and support myriad insect species. Pollution: A large number of houses could result in pollution, affecting the delicate balance of the woodland. Light pollution: Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats (seven species present including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle). Moths are also affected by light pollution. Disturbance: Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. Pets could also be an issue. Cats are supreme predators which could impact the wildlife. Dogs could also disturb wildlife and their faeces, if not picked up, have a detrimental effect on the wood. ASB. Potential for vandalism, fires, litter. Flooding. Converting ‘porous’ fields into tarmac and concrete-covered land would increase runoff during heavy rainfall. Flooding of the woodland could result in severe damage including trees falling due to the soil around their roots being eroded. Summary : Housebuilding on green belt land (FRO01 and FRO02) would have serious detrimental effects for the town, its residents, and nature (specifically Hob Hey Wood). I do not believe that house building on FRO01 and FRO02 is a suitable solution for the demand for more houses and other areas should be chosen instead.

Comment

Representation ID: 486

Received: 26/07/2025

Respondent: Julie Dawson

I&O_569
Traffic. Without road improvements, Frodsham, already subject to severe congestion (especially during M56 problems), could be gridlocked often, increasing pollution levels. Emergency vehicles would struggle, putting lives at risk. Existing roads appear unsuitable to cope with construction traffic. Inadequate infrastructure. Services such as GPs, dentists, schools and social services are already stretched. Any increase in population without increased services would strain the services further. Sewage systems. Overpopulation intensifies surface drain issues in residential areas due to increased impermeable surfaces, overwhelming existing drainage systems, leading to flooding. The conversion of natural, permeable surfaces (e.g. fields!), to concrete/tarmac, reduces rainwater absorption, causing more runoff and increased risk of surface water flooding. This occurs when drainage systems can't handle the volume of water, causing it to accumulate on the surface and potentially enter properties. Surface water runoff can carry pollutants into water bodies, impacting water quality and harming wildlife. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way. Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Potential impact on property values. If development results in the problems listed above, it could impact residents’ property values. Impact on nature particularly Hob Hey  Hob Hey is ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat which is being reduced every year. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Many species only occur in ancient woodland (so become rarer with each lost ancient wood). The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature (which are significant and scientifically proven). Building next to the wood could have catastrophic effects: Destruction of wildlife corridors. Wildlife relies on such routes (e.g. hedgerows) to move between areas. If destroyed (say, by a housing development) the wildlife becomes trapped and could decline. Hedgerows are themselves invaluable wildlife sites for nesting birds and animals and support myriad insect species. Pollution. A large number of houses could result in pollution, affecting the delicate balance of the woodland. Light pollution. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats (seven species present including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle). Moths are also affected by light pollution. Disturbance. Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. ASB. Potential for vandalism, fires, litter. Flooding. Converting ‘porous’ fields into tarmac and concrete-covered land would increase runoff during heavy rainfall. Flooding of the woodland could result in severe damage including trees falling due to the soil around their roots being eroded. Summary. Housebuilding on green belt land (FRO01 and FRO02) would have serious detrimental effects for the town, its residents, and nature (specifically Hob Hey Wood). I do not believe that house building on FRO01 and FRO02 is a suitable solution for the demand for more houses and other areas should be chosen instead. 

Comment

Representation ID: 487

Received: 27/07/2025

Respondent: Holtons Consultancy Ltd

I&O_570
Traffic Congestion and Emergency Access Frodsham already experiences severe congestion when the M56 is closed, serving as a diversion route. A 2022 report by Highways England recorded a 22% increase in traffic during such events, adversely affecting emergency response times. Without substantial infrastructure improvements, any additional residential or construction traffic would further strain already congested roads like the A56 and B5152. This raises serious concerns about access for emergency services, especially for residents on the outskirts of town. Cheshire Fire and Rescue has previously highlighted these risks during periods of high traffic. Pressure on Public Services Frodsham falls within the Cheshire West jurisdiction of the NHS Cheshire and Merseyside Integrated Care System, where GP access is below the national average. The Knoll Surgery is already experiencing delays in routine appointments due to high patient numbers. NHS dental access in the region has diminished significantly since 2021, with many practices no longer accepting new patients. Schools such as Helsby High and nearby primary institutions are close to full capacity, with no current plans for expansion. Without upfront investment in local services, further population growth would place unsustainable pressure on health, education, and public services. Sewage and Flooding Risks Increased population density leads to more hard surfaces, such as roads and driveways, which limit natural water absorption and overwhelm existing drainage systems. This raises the risk of surface water flooding and pollution. Between the late 1990s and 2005, residents in Langdale Way experienced multiple sewage floods due to inadequate drainage. The resolution involved major excavation work at Manor House School fields to install large storage tanks, identified by United Utilities as the only viable solution. Any nearby development could trigger a recurrence of these problems. Property Value Implications Should the negative impacts mentioned above materialize, there could be a corresponding decline in property values for local residents. Environmental and Ecological Impact — Hob Hey Wood Hob Hey Wood is a designated Site of Biological Interest and an ancient woodland — one of the most biodiverse habitats in the UK, which are rapidly declining. Over 800 species have been recorded in the area, including some that are rare or endemic to ancient woodlands. The area is not only vital for biodiversity but also serves as a recreational and mental health resource for residents, supporting well-being, lowering blood pressure, and reducing anxiety, as confirmed in research including Mind’s Nature and Mental Health  report. Ecological Threats from Development: Wildlife Corridors : Developments could sever hedgerows and other wildlife corridors that allow species to move between habitats. Fragmentation could lead to population declines. Hedgerow Loss : Hedgerows support birds, small mammals, and countless insect species, serving as crucial ecological zones. Pollution : Increased vehicle use, surface runoff, and artificial lighting can significantly disrupt local ecosystems. A 2020 Natural England report found that even small-scale developments near ancient woodlands led to a 45% drop in invertebrate biodiversity within five years. Light Pollution : This poses a threat to nocturnal wildlife, particularly bats. Hob Hey hosts seven species, including the rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also impacted, as shown in a long-term German study on light pollution and insect morphology. Disturbance from Humans and Pets : New housing could bring noise, litter, and vandalism to the area. Cats pose a predation risk to birds and small mammals, while dogs can disturb wildlife and their waste can degrade soil quality. Flood Risk : Replacing permeable fields with impermeable surfaces increases runoff and could lead to flooding within Hob Hey. Waterlogged soil can destabilize trees, leading to root erosion and tree falls. Conclusion Developing Green Belt sites FRO01 and FRO02 would pose significant risks to local infrastructure, public services, the environment, and the well-being of residents. The unique biodiversity of Hob Hey Wood would be particularly vulnerable. In light of these issues, these sites should not be considered suitable for housing development. Alternative locations with less environmental and infrastructural impact should be prioritized.

Comment

Representation ID: 489

Received: 27/07/2025

Respondent: Eirlyse Crawford

I&O_572
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed developments of a large area of green belt in the Frodsham/Hob Hey area, section 5.1 key questions SS41, SS42 and SS43. As I'm sure you already know/has already been highlighted by other concerned residents, the proposed planning developments will have a detrimental effect on every aspect of daily life for the residents of the surrounding area.  From traffic/congestion/emergency services, to the strain on health/education/public services, to the impact on the sewage systems, access to GP's/hospitals and schools, the impracticality of this many new properties/residents is extremely widespread, and has not one positive impact. Besides these reasons there are also infrastructural factors which seem to have been disregarded in the proposed planning process - such as flood risks, the suitability of the land which is intended for development, and the fact that the proposed plans do not comply with the National Planning Policy framework (paragraph 137 - 140). The levels of pollution, light pollution and potential increase of criminal activity/vandalism/antisocial behavior has also not been considered.    I'm sure I am not the only resident who has expressed their distress and dissatisfaction with these ridiculous plans, and I/we emplore you to see reason regarding this matter.  These plans should be dismissed entirely, for the wellbeing of this entire community. My family has lived here for many generations, and the thought of this wonderful place being reduced to a huge property development in order to cram in as many people as possible and ruin our town, is a disgrace. 

Comment

Representation ID: 490

Received: 27/07/2025

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Colin & Susan Nuttall

I&O_573
Traffic Impact and Emergency Access Risks Frodsham is already used as a diversion route during M56 incidents, causing gridlock through the town. A 2022 Highways England report showed a 22% traffic increase during closures, with emergency response times impacted. Without major infrastructure upgrades, additional residential or construction traffic would put further pressure on already-congested routes such as the A56 and B5152. The risk to emergency vehicle access is serious, particularly for residents at the edge of town. Cheshire Fire and Rescue has previously flagged response concerns during peak traffic events. Strain on Health, Education and Public Services Frodsham falls under the Cheshire West area of the NHS Cheshire and Merseyside Integrated Care System, where GP access has been repeatedly flagged as below national average. The Knoll Surgery, which serves much of Frodsham, has reported growing delays for routine appointments due to patient volume. Dental access in the wider Cheshire West area has also been restricted since multiple NHS dentists ceased taking new patients post-2021. School places at Helsby High and other nearby primaries are near capacity, and no expansion plans are in place. Any major increase in population without up-front investment in services would put existing provision under unsustainable pressure. Sewage systems Overpopulation intensifies surface drain issues in residential areas due to increased impermeable surfaces, overwhelming existing drainage systems, leading to flooding. The conversion of natural, permeable surfaces (e.g. fields!), to concrete/tarmac, reduces rainwater absorption, causing more runoff and increased risk of surface water flooding. This occurs when drainage systems can't handle the volume of water, causing it to accumulate on the surface and potentially enter properties. Surface water runoff can carry pollutants into water bodies, impacting water quality and harming wildlife. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way. Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Potential impact on property values If development results in the problems listed above, it could impact residents’ property values. Impact on nature particularly Hob Hey Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat which is being reduced every year. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland (so become rarer with each lost ancient wood). The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression (‘Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind). Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/ ). Building next to the wood could have catastrophic effects: Destruction of wildlife corridors. Wildlife relies on such routes (e.g. hedgerows) to move between areas. If destroyed (say, by a housing development) the wildlife becomes trapped and could decline. Hedgerows are themselves invaluable wildlife sites for nesting birds and animals and support myriad insect species ( https://heartofenglandforest.org/news/why-are-wildlife-corridors-important ). Pollution A large number of houses could result in pollution, affecting the delicate balance of the woodland. Increased vehicle emissions, surface water runoff, and light pollution have been proven to degrade native habitats, disturb wildlife patterns, and introduce harmful particulates into fragile soil systems. A 2020 Natural England report found that small-scale developments near ancient woodland caused a 45% drop in invertebrate biodiversity within five years. Light pollution Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats as detailed in Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. There are seven species present including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution(Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004 ). Disturbance Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. Pets could also be an issue. Cats are supreme predators which could impact the wildlife. Dogs could also disturb wildlife and their poo, if not picked up, have a detrimental effect on the wood. ASB. Potential for vandalism, fires, litter. Flooding. Converting ‘porous’ fields into tarmac and concrete-covered land would increase runoff during heavy rainfall. Flooding of the woodland could result in severe damage including trees falling due to the soil around their roots being eroded. Summary . Housebuilding on green belt land (FRO01 and FRO02) would have serious detrimental effects for the town, its residents, and nature (specifically Hob Hey Wood). We do not believe that house building on FRO01 and FRO02 is a suitable solution for the demand for more houses and other areas should be chosen instead.

Comment

Representation ID: 516

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Historic England

I&O_599
Any option should be accompanied by a robust assessment of the historic environment, heritage assets and their setting to inform the best solution.

Comment

Representation ID: 597

Received: 29/07/2025

Respondent: Andrew Garland

I&O_680
The 3 potential growth areas around Frodsham all have potential shortcomings, in particular those associated with Option C: 1500-2000 homes would result in a population increase of at least 40%.  This would lead to the amalgomation of Frodsham and Helsby to create a single urban area, with resultant loss of local identity and heritage value for the town and its surrounding countryside. Transport routes into and within Frodsham are already congested at peak times and especially when traffic is diverted through the town from the motorway. A massive increase in population would only add to the strain felt by the current residents with respect to transport issues, as well as increasing local atmospheric pollution and increasing the risk of vehicle accidents. Each site would result in the loss of  agricultural land. The capacity of local schools and medical facilities would be inadequate for such a dramatic population increase. It is already very difficult to get GP appointments within a reasonable timeframe! Would the current sewage treatment locations for Frodsham waste be able to cope with a 40%+ increase in volumes? Would expansions to these facilities be able to keep pace with population growth? There are a number of public rights of way (footpaths, bridleways etc) which run across areas 01, 02 and 03 providing an essential resource for the health and wellbeing of local people and visitors alike. The urbanisation of these routes would adversely affect their character and dramatically reduce enjoyment for users. Frodsham 01 and 02 areas have an especially high density of public footpaths, including popular named routes (Eddisbury Way and North Cheshire Way routes). Frodsham 01 would see development around the popular woodland and site of biological interest at Hob Hey Wood (the whole area is also subject to a Tree Preservation Order). This woodland would almost certainly be adversely impacted by significant additional footfall from the new local residents, not to mention light and noise pollution impacts. The woodland would become an 'island' surrounded by houses, cutting off vital wildlife corridoes. The current Local Plan and Sustainable Appraisal Objectives both highlight that development should be avoided on locations of high environmental value. Frodsham 02 - the spectacular views eastwards from Kingsley Road across the River Weaver valley and towards the Pennines would be obscured by new housing, changing the distinctiveness of the Fivecrosses area of the town. Frodsham 03 - housing in this area represents significant urban sprawl towards Helsby, drastically reducing green space between the settlements. If this was combined with development in Hel01 there would be no 'green' separation at all between Frodsham and Helsby.

Comment

Representation ID: 604

Received: 30/07/2025

Respondent: Laura Herriott

I&O_687
1. This Development Must Not Go Ahead This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. 2. Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. Source: Hansard (UK Parliament), 2015 – https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-11-17/debates/15111754000002/M56(Junctions12To14) 3. Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/). 4. Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf 5. Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source:  https://www.theguardian.com/.../dog-pee-and-poo-harming... 6. Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e 7. GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-control/local-plan/authority-monitoring-report 8. Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/pests-pollution-food-safety/pollution-and-air-quality/air-quality-review-and-assessment/action-plans/action-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004).   9. Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 10. House Prices Will Drop People buy in Frodsham for access to open countryside, peace, and green views. Strip those away, and the value drops. This development removes the very features that give existing homes their worth. Homeowners who’ve invested in the area will be hit with lower resale values and a loss of the rural edge they were sold on. Developers walk away with profit. Residents are left picking up the cost. 11. Greenbelt Is Not A Technicality The Greenbelt is there for a reason. Once you breach it, you set precedent for more erosion. This is not just about FRO01 or FRO02. It’s about what follows next if this goes ahead. National guidance is clear: development on Greenbelt land must be avoided unless there are absolutely no alternatives. In this case, there are alternatives. This land should remain untouched. Source: GOV.UK Greenbelt Guidance – ttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework/13-protecting-green-belt-land 12. Final Statement – Reject This Now This proposal is bad planning. It adds pressure to failing infrastructure. It increases flood risk. It destroys wildlife corridors. It worsens air quality. It lowers property values. It puts lives at risk. It benefits developers and damages communities. This is not sustainable. It is not justified. It is not acceptable. FRO01 and FRO02 must be removed from development plans entirely. This objection demands that the proposal be rejected in full. Nothing else will do.

Comment

Representation ID: 613

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Kathryn Pill

I&O_696
I am in particular objecting to the option to use Green Belt land in Frodsham to build houses around the Langdale Way / Townfield Lane / Hob Hey Wood area.    As a Frodsham resident and someone who uses this greenbelt area on a daily basis whether that is to walk my dog, walk with friends or visit my allotment at Townfields Allotments I value this quiet and beautiful area to support my physical and mental health. This area is full of wildlife, has an orchard, ancient woodland and a thriving badger population which we see evidence of daily on our allotment site which are protected by law.   I am very concerned that you are considering this area to build on. Our local Neighbourhood Plan was only completed last year and included sufficient alternative areas in Frodsham that can be utilised for housing without needing to ruin and lose valuable green space.    The government and other environmental bodies are trying desperately to improve our green space and this proposal is so out of line with what we as residents of frodsham want.   The destruction and devastation to wildlife that would be caused by building houses is just not acceptable, especially when alternative suitable sites have already been identified.   There is also the concern about access to new houses in this area. Getting out onto Fluin Lane from Langdale Way is already extremely difficult at Peak times and runs right next to the school. Additional roads and alternative access for transport would need to be put in place as current roads would not be able to support a new housing development. This will increase volume of traffic in frodsham which is already problematic along with increased noise and pollution.   Not to mention the need for additional school places, increased GP and dental services, which are rarely provided when houses are built.   There really are no positives for this proposal and the only option I support is option 1 which is to retain the greenbelt area.  

Comment

Representation ID: 615

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Mick Flaherty

I&O_698
Objection to Proposed Development in Helsby and Frodsham Introduction Cheshire West’s three development options all include major housebuilding near Helsby and Frodsham. These two distinct but neighbouring communities are surrounded by protected countryside and Green Belt, valued for their environment, wildlife, and character. Building thousands of homes here would breach national planning rules, damage the environment, overload infrastructure, and permanently alter the landscape. This objection sets out the case against that development, backed by local policy, national law, and public evidence. 1. Green Belt Policy and National Planning Framework The Green Belt around Helsby and Frodsham exists to prevent urban sprawl and protect the countryside. Cheshire West’s Local Plan confirms 42% of the borough is Green Belt, and states that only development that ‘requires a rural location’ should take place here. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) only allows Green Belt development in ‘exceptional circumstances’ and these have only been accepted in Chester, not Helsby or Frodsham. The council’s own documents make this clear. [See Local Plan Part One](https://cheshirewestandchester.objective.co.uk/portal/cwc_ldf/cwc_lp/localplanexamination/examination?pointId=1387277962825). 2. Local Neighbourhood Strategy and Sustainability Frodsham’s Neighbourhood Plan, approved through local consultation, proves the town can meet its housing need—around 250 homes by 2030—without touching the Green Belt. Residents were clear: they want protection of countryside, views, and town identity. That plan also highlights the value of preserving open fields and green corridors. [See Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan](https://frodsham.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/FNP-Referendum-version-comp.pdf). 3. Wildlife, Ecology and Landscape Damage Helsby and Frodsham border Local Wildlife Sites and are close to Ince Marshes, a nationally important ecological area. The Local Plan Part Two (Policies DM2, DM46–50) sets out strict protections for these sites. Development here would fragment habitats, disturb protected species and breach legal commitments to maintain biodiversity. [See Helsby Neighbourhood Plan](https://www.helsbyparishcouncil.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/116/2024/10/Helsby-Neighbourhood-Plan-made.pdf). 4. Infrastructure and Overload Risk The area’s roads, schools, and GP surgeries are already stretched. Building another 1,500 to 3,000 homes would push them beyond breaking point. There is no confirmed Infrastructure Delivery Plan to fix this. Local Plans are required to set development only where there is infrastructure to support it. This isn’t happening. [See Local Plan FAQs](https://cuddingtonandsandiwayonline.org/CWaC/2507_Local%20Plans%20Issues%20and%20Options%20FAQs.pdf). 5. Transport and Settlement Identity Option C pushes for housing along rail corridors. Helsby and Frodsham both have train stations, but this doesn’t mean they can take massive growth. Transport infrastructure is limited and no upgrades are planned. These towns are at risk of being swallowed into continuous sprawl. [See Local Plan Consultation](https://cheshirewestandchester.objective.co.uk/portal/cwc_ldf/lp2025/new_local_plan_2025?pointId=s17446409945409). 6. Historic Character and Community Value Frodsham’s market town character, local green space, and visual views of the Mersey estuary are a huge part of why people live here. Helsby has historic walking routes and a strong rural identity. Dumping thousands of homes here undermines the setting, identity, and well-being of residents. These aren’t just gaps on a map—they are living, valued landscapes. Consequences if Development is Allowed If these development options are approved, Helsby and Frodsham will lose their identity and purpose as distinct, semi-rural towns. They will be subsumed into ribbon development, with road congestion, longer GP waiting times, increased flooding risk, and loss of wildlife. This isn’t speculation. This is what happens when you ignore planning policy, local people, and ecology. Once the land is gone, it’s gone. Summary The Green Belt exists for a reason. These proposals are off-policy, unnecessary, and dangerous to the long-term quality of life in Helsby and Frodsham. No exceptional circumstances have been proven. The infrastructure isn't there. The law doesn't support it. The community doesn't want it. The consequences would be irreversible. Policy References and Sources Cheshire West and Chester Local Plan Part One: https://cheshirewestandchester.objective.co.uk/portal/cwc_ldf/cwc_lp/localplanexamination/examination?pointId=1387277962825 Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan: https://frodsham.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/FNP-Referendum-version-comp.pdf Helsby Neighbourhood Plan: https://www.helsbyparishcouncil.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/116/2024/10/Helsby-Neighbourhood-Plan-made.pdf Local Plan Issues and Options FAQs: https://cuddingtonandsandiwayonline.org/CWaC/2507_Local%20Plans%20Issues%20and%20Options%20FAQs.pdf Local Plan 2025 Consultation: https://cheshirewestandchester.objective.co.uk/portal/cwc_ldf/lp2025/new_local_plan_2025?pointId=s17446409945409

Comment

Representation ID: 617

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Will Moran

I&O_700
I have made some comments in the online consultation about both environmental assessments and habitat surveys but there doesn’t seem any way of making broader comments for consideration. I found the site very difficult to navigate and use. The proposed land for development outlined on the map on page 16 FRO 01 seems to include both Hob Hey wood and Frodsham Townfield Allotments as well as farm land which some of the owners say has been included without their permission. Building houses on an 82 plot allotment site which is registered as an asset of Community Value and includes a school plot and an adult care plot as well as a memorial hedge and orchard, would be an act of environmental vandalism and a huge blow to the health and wellbeing of all those who benefit from the site. I have no doubt the same is true of Hob Hey wood. Bradley Lane at the other end of the FRO 01 area is very narrow in places and would struggle with more traffic on it. The lane is affected by natural springs which regularly break up the road surface and cause disruption. The building of houses across this area would impact on the environment and drainage as many properties are on septic tanks for drainage. I hope that issues of school places, local health facilities and road capacity would be addressed if such large scale development of Frodsham is considered in this plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 618

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Emma Woodhouse

I&O_701
Please find attached to this email a document outlining my formal objection to the proposed planning development around Helsby and Frodsham. The objection outlines my reasoning based on planning policy, infrastructure capacity, lack of exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release and the consequential long-lasting environmental damage. 

Comment

Representation ID: 620

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Stewart Lightfoot

I&O_703
I wish to object to the potential developments listed below. Frodsham is page 11, areas affecting Hob Hey are FRO01 and FRO02. https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fconsult.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%2Fkse%2Fevent%2F38393&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253364611%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FOLuy8epMHmy92UYfyyZnrsN8L6imdLmjXPhPtKAdrY%3D&reserved=0 section 5.1 Key questions: SS41, SS42, SS43  This Development Must Not Go Ahead This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it.  Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. Source: Hansard (UK Parliament), 2015 – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhansard.parliament.uk%2FCommons%2F2015-11-17%2Fdebates%2F15111754000002%2FM56&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253399925%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=j4jHDGJ8oYkfb%2BK22568t6slsKytQtjWoP%2Fk83SXGic%3D&reserved=0(Junctions12To14)   Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Farticles%2FPMC9665958%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253417343%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZeUYbNeL8ficFnInME5qc3YIg3iie6xh49lyM8MzBb0%3D&reserved=0 ).  Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk%2Fpublished-documents%2FEN010153-000069-6.1_ES%2520Vol%25201%2520Chapter%25207%2520Terrestrial%2520Ecology.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253431732%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=SVIS1EEPZxXax7TTqXUMT1EUUbEKmu2c9gbzlh5Rxwo%3D&reserved=0   Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2022%2Ffeb%2F07%2Fdog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253445828%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5TjcNnBOHE%2FFBT0aGRGwSyY6WIjn2gwm6gLsYoTkgKU%3D&reserved=0   Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%2Fdocuments%2Fparking-roads-and-travel%2Fhighways%2Fflood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253459091%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BYh9OJbeTJbGSoW3MyMY6kaKQgk942VtvEP9cIS95Ms%3D&reserved=0 Source: Financial Times – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcontent%2Fff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253472489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OIoJbkihPIcINorOrT4MUfJOaq2GMR4goHBdfnXa7D4%3D&reserved=0   GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%2Fresidents%2Fplanning-and-building-control%2Flocal-plan%2Fauthority-monitoring-report&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253485697%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gwX0x%2BftLouEqHf3u8RIJf6g9Vth%2BJwqWZT5EnX9mSI%3D&reserved=0   Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%2Fdocuments%2Fpests-pollution-food-safety%2Fpollution-and-air-quality%2Fair-quality-review-and-assessment%2Faction-plans%2Faction-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253498791%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FJ1oLg9IINKEJAc3RB3Q4awWilCykrn%2F1X1SG0FjFmg%3D&reserved=0 Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.baae.2021.05.004&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253511956%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QEjbXmVDIUdQrPSPRpx2VgTSoZSUYKmlD1Ag1ncQvu4%3D&reserved=0 ). Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%2Fpublications%2Fnational-planning-policy-framework--2&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253525352%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JXU%2BQe0HAgvFqpkjuvKvPN1%2B1SNHqb3VzCBPmx%2F%2BvPY%3D&reserved=0   House Prices Will Drop People buy in Frodsham for access to open countryside, peace, and green views. Strip those away, and the value drops. This development removes the very features that give existing homes their worth. Homeowners who’ve invested in the area will be hit with lower resale values and a loss of the rural edge they were sold on. Developers walk away with profit. Residents are left picking up the cost. Greenbelt Is Not A Technicality The Greenbelt is there for a reason. Once you breach it, you set precedent for more erosion. This is not just about FRO01 or FRO02. It’s about what follows next if this goes ahead. National guidance is clear: development on Greenbelt land must be avoided unless there are absolutely no alternatives. In this case, there are alternatives. This land should remain untouched. Source: GOV.UK Greenbelt Guidance – ttps://https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%2Fguidance%2Fnational-planning-policy-framework%2F13-protecting-green-belt-land&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7Cd4002abd1fc1402bfd7e08ddcdeee2a3%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638893148253540945%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xOJsVAzs6Vekd2tUN4F3pvMT%2FI4mQlRRqzAOnw36WWk%3D&reserved=0  Final Statement – Reject This Now This proposal is bad planning. It adds pressure to failing infrastructure. It increases flood risk. It destroys wildlife corridors. It worsens air quality. It lowers property values. It puts lives at risk. It benefits developers and damages communities. This is not sustainable. It is not justified. It is not acceptable. FRO01 and FRO02 must be removed from development plans entirely. This objection demands that the proposal be rejected in full. Nothing else will do.

Comment

Representation ID: 621

Received: 28/07/2025

Respondent: Fran Holland

I&O_704
CWAC council have highlighted many green belt areas to build houses on to meet their housebuilding targets. One of these is the area between the Lakes Estate, Frodsham and Bradley, encompassing Hob Hey Wood. It appears this area was chosen due to proximity to Frodsham Train Station, WITHOUT any consideration to its suitability. This Development Must Not Go Ahead. This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. Source: Hansard (UK Parliament), 2015 – https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-11-17/debates/15111754000002/M56(Junctions12To14) Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/ ). Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/07/dog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-control/local-plan/authority-monitoring-report Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/pests-pollution-food-safety/pollution-and-air-quality/air-quality-review-and-assessment/action-plans/action-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004 ). Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 House Prices Will Drop People buy in Frodsham for access to open countryside, peace, and green views. Strip those away, and the value drops. This development removes the very features that give existing homes their worth. Homeowners who’ve invested in the area will be hit with lower resale values and a loss of the rural edge they were sold on. Developers walk away with profit. Residents are left picking up the cost. Greenbelt Is Not A Technicality The Greenbelt is there for a reason. Once you breach it, you set precedent for more erosion. This is not just about FRO01 or FRO02. It’s about what follows next if this goes ahead. National guidance is clear: development on Greenbelt land must be avoided unless there are absolutely no alternatives. In this case, there are alternatives. This land should remain untouched. Source: GOV.UK Greenbelt Guidance –  ttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework/13-protecting-green-belt-land Final Statement – Reject This Now This proposal is bad planning. It adds pressure to failing infrastructure. It increases flood risk. It destroys wildlife corridors. It worsens air quality. It lowers property values. It puts lives at risk. It benefits developers and damages communities. This is not sustainable. It is not justified. It is not acceptable. FRO01 and FRO02 must be removed from development plans entirely. This objection demands that the proposal be rejected in full. Nothing else will do.