Comment

Representation ID: 13703

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Dr Ian Lancaster

I&O_14223
With regard to the consultation on development of green belt land adjacent to Hob Hey Wood, I raise the following objections: Hob Hey wood is an ancient woodland, predominantly broadleaf deciduous and home to a number of endangered species.  It offers a unique habitat and any development in the area immediately adjacent to it would be detrimental to both the woodland and its resident species. Development and the building of houses on this land would significantly increase traffic in the vicinity of Townfield Lane, Langdale Way, Fluin Lane and associated routes.  Frodsham is repeatedly gridlocked in the event of any disruption on the nearby M56 and further development would only worsen this.  Additionally, the traffic around Manor House School (Langdale Way) during the school run is already at capacity. There is insufficient infrastructure in Frodsham to accommodate any significant development.  Dentists, GP surgeries and other facilities are already full to capacity.  Unless there is significant associated investment in these vital resources to accommodate the increase in housing the development is unsustainable. Flood risk. Langdale Way has a recent history of flooding. Increasing the strain on drainage infrastructure will simply ensure a return to the recent flooding problems.  

Comment

Representation ID: 13726

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Emmanuelle Emslie

I&O_14246
Having read the information sent to me about potential building on Kingsley Road, I would like to voice a few concerns.  Kingsley Road is already a very busy road, with cars speeding, Lorrys passing by and with many children walking or cycling to school. Pedestrians are already limited to thin pavements.  I am extremely concerned that the traffic and footfall would increase and that the noise level would increase. It is currently very noisy due to the traffic heading to the forest and nearby primary schools, and villages and Frodsham centre.  Kingsley Road is already a dangerous road that would benefit from speed cameras! I am most grateful for having an opportunity to voice my concerns.  Thank you so much.  Please could you keep me informed of further discussions. 

Comment

Representation ID: 13746

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Anushka Reese

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_14266
I am writing to express my concern around the Frodsham Neighbourhood plans. Respectfully, I believe the proposal to build on the fields that the houses on Ellis Lane back on to, is a disastrous one. It is my sincere belief that developing these green belt areas would be irresponsible, impractical and a deeply misguided decision. I, along with many other local residents, object to the proposal for a number of reasons, and while I cannot speak for others, my own objections are as follows. My primary concern is the disruption and impact on the surrounding wildlife. It is clear the environmental consequences of these plans have either not been understood or have been afforded only scant consideration. Living so close to Hob Hey Woods, we are fortunate enough to have an abundance of native wildlife visiting throughout the year. Amongst them are Badgers, Foxes, Hedgehogs, Pipistrelle Bats, Barn Owls, Kestrels, Kingfishers, Crested Newts, Hares and even Stoats. It is these residents, 8 species of which are protected under law in the UK, that the plans most need to take into account. These creatures are as deserving as we are to have a home and space to live and thrive in, in a world that is increasingly ignorant to this. When I was twelve, I bought a night vision camera after developing an intense interest in monitoring and supporting the local wildlife. I was overjoyed to learn that we had a full family of Badgers (An adult male, female and three cubs) visiting our garden to feed and drink and it wasn’t long before hedgehogs and foxes followed suit. I am acutely aware that new residents may not be so welcoming of these critters. Despite being protected, Badgers in particular are prominently villainised in the media, largely thanks to the cull and its misinformed mindset in England. In addition to this and as a larger issue, paved driveways, hedgerow removal, and with widespread eradication of green spaces in favour of urbanisation becoming common practice, woodland animals are struggling for room to live alongside us. Fortunately, for several years now, the fields and Hob Hey have been a safe haven for these animals while still allowing humans to live unproblematically and adjacently.  We must continue to respect this boundary both as a duty to our protected, native species and to preserve a key piece of Frodsham’s history. These green belt areas should  explicitly remain so, and are to be recognised as important, valued and liberated expanses of rural British countryside. Another aspect I take issue with is the complete disregard these plans have for our pollinators who play a vital role in the security and survival of our ecosystem. Bees are already in decline, which urban development is a leading cause of, yet come the spring and summer, the fields erupts with activity. Building on these fields would callously invade this essential and flourishing space, threatening or outright destroying the homes and habitats of some of our most established residents. To say nothing of the tragic but probable increased roadkill new properties would generate. Whats more, my family and I have already experienced, firsthand, the impact of an unprecedented number of newcomers on Ellis Lane on to Hob Hey and Top Field. During the Covid-19 lockdown, people started to go for walks more often, as we were, and we soon noticed the evidence they left behind. Unfortunately, the lane and the woods saw a notable rise in litter and dog excrements. This demonstration of the lack of basic decency from people prompts genuine cause for concern regarding how the condition and upkeep of both the rural and residential areas would suffer with another influx of people, and this time, significantly more. The plans would also take over productive agricultural land. This seems a non sensical state of affairs particularly given there are brown belt areas to explore as alternative options for these plans. My final point is regarding the unsuitability of the fields in terms of infrastructure. All of the ponds in the area originated from marl pits. This unstable ground is simply not safe to build on. In addition to this, the ponds are home to Great Crested Newts, a species that is strictly protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017. This law also states that you must not build within 500 meters of a Great Crested Newt inhabited pond. Including the Top Field Pond Trail, we have several. I understand the need for housing in Frodsham, but these concerns, along with those raised by my neighbours, make it clear to me that the fields are not appropriate for the plans you have proposed. I am not sure how many residents are officially objecting, but I can tell you that the consensus on Ellis Lane is unanimously one of rejection. Frodsham’s prevalence as a welcoming, residential market town is as intertwined with its longstanding legacy as a semi-rural location with a keen eye for retaining its green belt areas. This proposal would blatantly disrupt the green belt's aesthetic and cultural value that Frodsham residents have cherished for many years. I sincerely hope you recognise and do not understate the responsibility you have to preserve this area as is, and that you act to protect it.

Comment

Representation ID: 13781

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Molly Jones

I&O_14301
I am writing to formally object to the proposed development site allocations SS41, SS42, and SS43 as outlined in the current Local Plan consultation. These proposals raise several serious concerns for myself and many others in the local community, including: • Pressure on Local Infrastructure: The developments would place additional strain on already overburdened infrastructure such as roads, schools, and healthcare services. Access to GP appointments is already limited, and school capacity in the area is under significant pressure. • Impact on Green Space and Biodiversity: The sites lie within or adjacent to Green Belt land and include areas of important natural habitat. Hob Hey Wood, in particular, is a valued local amenity, rich in biodiversity and used by many residents. These developments would cause irreversible damage to this sensitive environment. • Increased Traffic and Road Safety Concerns: The proposed developments would significantly increase traffic through the village and surrounding areas, particularly during peak times. Many local roads are narrow and not designed to accommodate high volumes of traffic, raising concerns about road safety, congestion, and increased air pollution. • Character of the Area: The scale and density of the proposed housing are not in keeping with the existing character of our historic market town. Such large-scale developments would alter the town’s identity and may negatively impact local property values. • Flood Risk: The area includes several streams and watercourses, and further development could exacerbate local flooding issues, particularly with the loss of permeable green land. In light of these concerns, I believe these developments would negatively affect both the environment and the well-being of current and future residents. I urge the Council to remove SS41, SS42, and SS43 from the Local Plan and to consider more appropriate, sustainable alternatives.

Comment

Representation ID: 13808

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Linda Brown

I&O_14328
I would like to object to the proposed development of FR001 and FR002. Hob Hey wood: Ancient woodland is one of our most irreplaceable natural assets. Once lost, it cannot be recreated. These habitats support rare and threatened species, act as vital wildlife corridors linking fragmented landscapes, and play a crucial role in natural flood management by soaking up rainfall and slowing water flows. Protecting them is essential for biodiversity, climate resilience and community wellbeing. Although I now live in Runcorn I grew up in Frodsham as did my children and grandchildren. We have all enjoyed spending time in Hob Hey wood. It is a beautiful, very precious ancient woodland which belongs to the people of Frodsham and should never be threatened by proposed housing developments. At the same time, I recognise the housing crisis and the urgent need for new homes. Development is necessary, but it must be in suitable, sustainable locations where infrastructure, services and transport can support growth, and where it does not destroy irreplaceable habitats or undermine climate goals. I hope you will take my objection into consideration.

Comment

Representation ID: 13814

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Julia Hiscock

I&O_14334
Hob Hey Wood  is my sanctuary. I walk there every day. I live with arthritis and am overweight, so it’s the one place close enough for me to manage regular exercise. Since losing my husband last year, it has been the single most important thing helping me keep going. It isn’t just about me. I bring my great-nephew and great-niece from urban Warrington, where they have little access to nature. In Hob Hey they’ve learned to love birdsong, watch for signs of badgers, talk about the bat boxes, play by the stream, and even cook with wild garlic. They are learning about wildlife in a way that will stay with them for life. When I first moved to Frodsham, I didn’t know anyone. Joining the volunteer group Friends of Hob Hey Wood  was how I began to feel part of the community. The sense of community spirit among the volunteers, and the care and hours people give, makes the wood feel so loved and so valued. If development takes place in the fields around the wood, it won’t just spoil the setting. It will damage an incredibly fragile and precious area.  So threatening species, disturbing the wildlife corridors used by badgers and bats, and putting at risk the balance of water flow and the natural environment that sustains the wood and its species. Hob Hey itself may remain, but the qualities that make it so special would be permanently harmed.

Comment

Representation ID: 13819

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Julia Hiscock

I&O_14339
Green Belt The Green Belt here is vital. It: Stops Frodsham from being swallowed up by more housing sprawl. Protects the character of the town and its open spaces. Safeguards Hob Hey Wood , which is one of the most valued places in the whole area. If the Green Belt is weakened, we lose more than fields. We lose part of what makes Frodsham special. Development would also risk damaging fragile species, affect natural water flow, and increase pollution, all of which would harm Hob Hey Wood itself.   Biodiversity and Wildlife Hob Hey Wood is home to hundreds of species, including rare butterflies, badgers, and bats. The fields around it are part of the same living system. They act as wildlife corridors.  For example, badgers have been seen travelling along Townfield Road from their sets and are important for bats and other nocturnal animals too. Development here would fragment habitats, block natural corridors, and disturb wildlife through noise, light, and loss of space. It would also risk the delicate balance of water flow and could bring pollution that the woodland cannot withstand. This is a very fragile environment, and once it’s damaged, it cannot be restored.   Community Wellbeing and Social Value This isn’t just about nature. Hob Hey Wood is where people walk, where children play and learn, and where volunteers put in hours of love and labour. It’s a place that supports health and wellbeing in a very real way. For me personally, it’s been vital. It’s where I walk every day to keep moving despite arthritis. It’s where I went after my husband died, and those daily visits helped me cope. It’s where I bring my great-niece and great-nephew so they can learn about nature in a way they’d never get at home in Warrington. And it’s where I found my community through volunteering with the Friends of Hob Hey Wood , meeting people and joining in the shared effort to care for our wood. Losing the surrounding fields to development would take away so much of what makes Hob Hey Wood valuable — not just to me, but to so many others in the community.   Conclusion I ask the Council to prioritise Option A  and protect the Green Belt around Hob Hey Wood. The fields next to the Hob Hey Wood must not be allocated for development. Hob Hey Wood is more than just trees — it’s a fragile ecosystem, a community hub, and a place of health, learning, and belonging. If the land around it is lost, the wood itself will suffer, and so will the people, community and wildlife who depend on it.

Comment

Representation ID: 13851

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Eve Dougherty

I&O_14371
Page 11,  FRO01 and FRO02. Local plan issues and options - 5.1 Key questions: SS41, SS42, SS43 This Development Must Not Go Ahead This is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. Source: Hansard (UK Parliament), 2015 –  https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-11-17/debates/15111754000002/M56(Junctions12To14)   Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/ ). Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate –  https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source:  https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/07/dog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA –  https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times –  https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports –  https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-control/local-plan/authority-monitoring-report Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan –  https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/pests-pollution-food-safety/pollution-and-air-quality/air-quality-review-and-assessment/action-plans/action-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004 ). Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise  New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) –  https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 Infrastructure on Bradley Lane Bradley Lane has no mains drainage  Many houses on Bradley lane have no mains drainage and the soak aways are in the fields were the developments are planned. This would be a huge cost and distruption as they would have to be put on mains drainage. In addition, the lane is too narrow for additional traffic and already has collapsed drains that cause traffic problems in icy weather that have not been repaired by the local authority. Greenbelt Is Not A Technicality The Greenbelt is there for a reason. Once you breach it, you set precedent for more erosion. This is not just about FRO01 or FRO02. It’s about what follows next if this goes ahead. National guidance is clear: development on Greenbelt land must be avoided unless there are absolutely no alternatives. In this case, there are alternatives. This land should remain untouched. Source:  GOV.UK  Greenbelt Guidance – ttps:// www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework/13-protecting-green-belt-land Final Statement – Reject This Now This proposal is bad planning. It adds pressure to failing infrastructure. It increases flood risk. It destroys wildlife corridors. It worsens air quality. It lowers property values. It puts lives at risk. It benefits developers and damages communities. This is not sustainable. It is not justified. It is not acceptable. FRO01 and FRO02 must be removed from development plans entirely. This objection demands that the proposal be rejected in full. 

Comment

Representation ID: 13854

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Holly Henderson

I&O_14374
I object to policies SS41, SS42 and SS43.  As a family we use Hob Hey Wood and the surrounding fields lots and it would be awful to see it go. Such a beautiful spot that Frodsham is lucky to have.  

Comment

Representation ID: 13869

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Stone

I&O_14389
Yes, don’t build on FRO01 and FRO02. This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. Objections in detail   Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/ ). Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/07/dog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e

Comment

Representation ID: 13885

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Dobson

I&O_14405
I wish to lodge an objection to the planning policy for new housing options being considered in Frodsham. I strongly object to any proposal or option for the construction of housing on greenbelt land. Particularly areas in options FRO02 and FRO03 which are options to build housing on beautiful countryside. If developed the local community will lose beautiful countryside forever. Green belt development should be an absolute last resort. Especially when for example large stores such as Browns of Chester has closed and leaves a large vacant complex of buildings in the city centre that could be re-used. Cities are being vacated by shops due to an ever expanding online shopping culture. Re-use as living units in cities would be desirable as transport infrastructure is already in place. This should take priority over loss of green belt - once it’s gone it’s gone.

Comment

Representation ID: 13936

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: India Freer-Carmichael

I&O_14456
I would like to object to policy SS42. I feel that this building work would cause the following issues -  Increased flood risk More gridlock on Frodsham roads Strain on GPs, dentists and schools Destruction of wildlife corridors Damage to ancient woodland Worse air quality and light pollution Falling house prices Loss of community green space

Comment

Representation ID: 13942

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Laura Stone

I&O_14462
Yes, don’t build on FRO01 and FRO02. This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. Objections in detail   Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Farticles%2FPMC9665958%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C42d852bb73204baeace708dde71efdda%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638920842647910598%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dNWE1oFLuL6GK7gv%2BSWb3%2F2PszCcNZgrkz6Jng6MICM%3D&reserved=0 ). Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk%2Fpublished-documents%2FEN010153-000069-6.1_ES%2520Vol%25201%2520Chapter%25207%2520Terrestrial%2520Ecology.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C42d852bb73204baeace708dde71efdda%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638920842647939859%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VRmDyttREfEX8bqTjT8YA7WC7He2cCiW5Eaviw%2BVUSc%3D&reserved=0 Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2022%2Ffeb%2F07%2Fdog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C42d852bb73204baeace708dde71efdda%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638920842647957276%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WAVtR07SJkFTco%2BgbxdeGeiAJuEoW9%2FZ5JNFGS5C%2Fpg%3D&reserved=0 Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%2Fdocuments%2Fparking-roads-and-travel%2Fhighways%2Fflood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C42d852bb73204baeace708dde71efdda%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638920842647973571%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2jUWOcujeJgWRNHn0lAtGVkvos91jKwATKpbr%2FMwUTQ%3D&reserved=0 Source: Financial Times – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcontent%2Fff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C42d852bb73204baeace708dde71efdda%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638920842647989256%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NNuCXt5eI8B3kPc1%2F1w3qXapKrdD1aeDDoV%2FuGtFAEk%3D&reserved=0

Comment

Representation ID: 13956

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Emily Anderson

I&O_14476
I am writing to object to policy SS42 of the proposed development plan as it will cause irreversible environmental damage and place unnecessary added strain on already struggling local services. As a young person who has lived in Frodsham all my life, I am grateful for the beautiful historic woodland of Hob Hey Wood and abundance of green space which contributes to high air quality, improved physical and mental health outcomes (which has been proven by countless accredited medical studies and meta-analyses), in addition to providing habitats for hundreds of different species. The destruction of this space would firstly cause immense ecological damage to the native wildlife, in addition to removing a prime area for exercise, fresh air, socialisation and stress relief. There would also be increased air and light pollution (which creates risk factors for respiratory and ophthalmic diseases), in addition to increased flood risk as these green spaces absorb excess rainwater, hence their loss would put the local community in danger that was seldom a problem previously. Moreover, the services in Frodsham barely support the current population, with many residents struggling to get a GP appointment from the horrendous backlog at our one remaining practice, and the main roads often being very busy for most of the year. To dramatically increase the population, with new deteriorated health outcomes from a loss of green space, would be wholly irresponsible as the existing services cannot care for them without massive investment and upheaval. Furthermore, the roads to many of the proposed development sites are of poor quality, being very narrow, poorly lit and near livestock. Thus, to properly access any new housing estates, you would have to destroy even more land to create better roads and potentially a bypass to prevent increased gridlock, not only on existing estates but in the town centre also.  To conclude, I have been very fortunate to have grown up in such a beautiful rural area and can only implore you to allow the current and future generations to continue enjoying this incredible and irreplicable space.

Comment

Representation ID: 13959

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Howard Pay

I&O_14479
I am writing to you to raise my strongest objection to any current or future planning application to the development of unwanted housing on Hob Hey Wood.    This is an appalling land grab on one of the coveted natural areas surrounding Frodsham and would lead to unwanted damage to not only the wood but all its living animals and insects.  Also it would lead to the following: Increased Flood Risk More Gridlock on Frodsham Roads Strain on GPs, Dentists, and Schools Destruction of Wildlife Corridors Damage to Ancient Woodland Worse Air Quality & Light Pollution Falling House Prices Loss of Community and Green Space Please reject this planning application NOW!

Comment

Representation ID: 13996

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Dr Llinos Brennen

I&O_14520
I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of housing on the fields just off Bradley Lane, adjacent to the ancient woodland near Frodsham. As a local resident, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact this development would have on both the environment and our local infrastructure. This site borders ancient woodland, which is an irreplaceable and ecologically sensitive habitat. My family and I regularly walk in this area and deeply value its peace, wildlife, and connection to nature. These green spaces play a vital role in community well-being and should be protected, not encroached upon. Beyond the environmental concerns, there are also serious questions about the capacity of local infrastructure to cope with further development. Local schools are already at or near full capacity, and securing places for children is becoming increasingly difficult for families in the area. An increase in population without corresponding investment in education, healthcare, and transport infrastructure would place even greater strain on services that are already stretched thin, negatively impacting the quality of life for both new and existing residents. For all these reasons — environmental, social, and infrastructural — I strongly urge you to reject this planning application and to prioritise the protection of our green spaces and the sustainability of our local community.

Comment

Representation ID: 14002

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Nicholas Johnson

I&O_14532
i want to object to policy ss42. this is to protect hob hey wood and our wildlife and to also protect our quality of living.

Comment

Representation ID: 14008

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Gillian Scholes

I&O_14545
I object to policy SS42.   As a family we regularly visit Hob Hey Wood and strongly object the removal of this important and locally treasured green area. I also don’t feel adequate assurance has been made to the impact to local services such as doctors, schooling and infrastructure like our local roads.  

Comment

Representation ID: 14012

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Rebecca Ravetto

I&O_14549
I would like to express concern about the proposed plans to build houses on land adjacent to Hob Hey Wood. I would urge you to reconsider the location. Hob Hey Wood is a precious gem in Frodsham and the surrounding fields are just so beautiful part of the charm of our ID and protect this area if vestry.

Comment

Representation ID: 14017

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Geraldine Dobson

I&O_14554
I am writing to strongly object to the proposed housing developments outlined in policy SS41 on Green Belt land in Frodsham. I have lived in Frodsham for 50 years, and I am deeply concerned about the impact these estates would have on our community, environment, and already stretched infrastructure.   Firstly, I wish to make clear that I am sympathetic and supportive of the government’s aims to build more affordable homes across the country. However, I do not believe that building on this area of local beauty and protected Green Belt is the appropriate location. There appears to have been little consideration given to the use of unoccupied buildings locally or brownfield sites, which could provide much-needed housing without destroying valued countryside.   My specific objections are as follows:   * Loss of character and community: Building over 1,300 houses will fundamentally alter the culture and sense of community that makes Frodsham unique.   * Traffic and infrastructure: Our local roads already suffer from congestion, severe potholes and the existing network is not suitable for the increased traffic these estates would generate. Access to the sites is not adequate and will cause serious safety and capacity issues.   * Strain on public services: Public services like health centres, dentists and schools in the area are already oversubscribed. The developments would put additional, unsustainable pressure on these essential services.   * Drainage issues: My property directly overlooks one of the proposed development sites. All properties on this road rely on septic tanks, and a large estate of this scale would require a complete overhaul of drainage systems, creating major cost and significant risk of flooding and pollution.   * Environmental harm:Hob Hey Wood is an ancient  woodland and a much-loved community asset. These developments would destroy wildlife corridors, damage biodiversity, and undermine efforts to protect our local environment.   * Lack of local benefit: No clear evidence has been presented to show how these developments will positively contribute to Frodsham’s economy, infrastructure, or services. Without these assurances, it is difficult to see how such harm can be justified.   For these reasons, I urge the Council to reject policies SS41, SS42 and SS43 and protect Frodsham’s Green Belt, countryside, and community.  

Comment

Representation ID: 14070

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: John Davies

FR001 and FR002
I&O_14613
FR001 and FR002 are part of a green corridor along the River Weaver extending from Frodsham to the outskirts of Northwich. This should be a priority area for CWAC to keep as undeveloped Green Belt land. It is a unique and special landscape of historic fields and hedgerows, old marl pits and ancient woodland. Allowing development close to Hob Hey Wood, for example, would be disastrous for this priceless site which is such a valuable asset for the people of Frodsham. As a plot holder at Frodsham Townfield Allotments, at the top of Langdale Way, I would like to stress what an important and valuable site it is. Overall official allotment provision In Frodsham is poor and our site now has over 80 plot holders and a long waiting list. It is registered as an Asset of Community Value and CWAC has recently been very helpful in providing money for toilet provision on site. Our plot holders are a mix of young and old, male and female, with a growing number of families taking up plots. The site is used by a local special needs school and provides a free well being plot for Petty Pool College for young people with learning disabilities and difficulties. In addition to the actual plots the allotment has reinstated a native hedge along an old field boundary, planted a community orchard and developed a native wildflower meadow. It is a great asset to the area and to our local community.

Comment

Representation ID: 14081

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Emma Miller

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_14624
I am writing to express my response in relation to the proposed planning in the Local Plan document - namely in relation to the planning proposal for Frodsham - ref FRO01 and FRO02, (SS41, SS42 and SS43). My objections are as follows: Green Belt Protection - The site is within the Green Belt. Green Belt protection is a major consideration in planning decisions. I do not feel development on this particular green belt would qualify as "exceptional circumstances." Traffic & Highway Safety - Frodsham already experiences significant congestion through the town, especially when incidents occur on the M56. On occasion, I have been unable to collect my children on time from their childcare settings in the town due to this congestion. Additional housing could exacerbate this. - substantial changes need to be made to the existing road and pathway infrastructure to make active travel safe before it is encouraged. There are no cycle lanes in the proposed planning area and often only one footpath on one side of the road which are regularly overgrown and impassable with wheelchairs/prams. - public transport options along Kingsley Road are limited to one infrequent bus service. The itravel bus is an option but is regularly booked up during school/work commuting hours. This limitation results in residents relying on car use. - The train service to Manchester is already a very busy service at commuting times. Standing room only is not uncommon and this would only get worse and more unbearable by increasing the population in the town. Any busier, and I would certainly consider driving to Manchester as a more stress free option defeating the proposal to encourage more use of public transport and active travel. Strain on Infrastructure (GPs, schools, etc.) - Existing public services are overstretched. The GP surgery is already challenged with appointment demand. Most recently, I was advised to take my son to Halton Urgent Care due to there being no available appointments, consequently, putting additional strain on this urgent service. - The same son is due to start Reception this summer - in a class of 31 children. Research strongly shows that smaller class sizes reap significant benefits for children, particularly in early years. The proposed planning is in this local school's catchment area which will only add to the pressure for places forcing families to have to make journeys to schools further away. - Increasing the population will also increase the long waiting lists for existing community groups - Scouts/Cubs/Beavers, local swimming lessons and allotment allocations to name a few. Sewage & Flooding Risks - Historically there has been significant surface water flooding in Langdale Way; major interventions were needed in the past. The risk of increasing impermeable surfaces needs significant consideration in relation to putting properties, businesses and highways at increased risk of flooding. Harm to Biodiversity and Ancient Woodland (Hob Hey Wood) - Hob Hey is ancient woodland – irreplaceable habitat. Development could disrupt wildlife, habitats and ecosystems. Hob Hey is home to a number of wildlife species including bats and is thoroughly enjoyed as a green space by the local community. - the community allotments are also a wonderfully enjoyed green space by many members of the community, also attracting pollinators and other wildlife. In conclusion, I feel this proposal cannot go ahead. It will add significant pressure to an already failing infrastructure, implode our public services and will cause permanent damage to our Greenbelt habitats, biodiversity and community green spaces.  

Comment

Representation ID: 14110

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Stephanie Garner

I&O_14653
I am extremely concerned and I am writing about SS41, SS42, SS43 proposals for Frodsham housing development. I know having been a recent property buyer in the area the importance of housing stock and accessibility to the housing market. It makes me very angry that people of my age cannot have access to housing in the local area, and even small properties are expensive.    That being said, I am appalled at the proposals outlined above, they clearly have no appreciation for the current infrastructure or residents or the area and show a lack of thought and care for the community of Frodsham. This area is unsuitable for a number of reasons which I have outlined below, I would urge you to consider in particular the impact on current infrastructure in line with planning proposals.    Traffic is Already Broken The A56 and main roads through Frodsham are regularly gridlocked. When the M56 is closed or partially shut, all diverted traffic comes through the town. The Weaver Viaduct carries over 112,000 vehicles daily. That number spikes during roadworks, collisions, or closures. None of this is future risk. It's already happening. Add hundreds of extra vehicles from FR001 and FR002 and the problem gets worse. Emergency vehicles already struggle to get through. This development will slow response times even more, putting lives at risk. GP Practices and Schools Are Full There is no spare capacity in Frodsham’s infrastructure. GP practices are running at limit. Schools are close to capacity. New homes mean more pressure, more waiting, more stretched services. No part of this development includes concrete plans or funding for new public services. That means the burden falls on existing ones, which are already struggling. Source: Cheshire West Monitoring Reports – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-control/local-plan/authority-monitoring-report Air Quality and Light Pollution Will Get Worse Frodsham is already inside an Air Quality Management Area. Cars are the top local pollutant. FR001 and FR002 would bring more cars, more exhaust, and more noise into a space that’s supposed to be protected. Lighting from new housing, cars and street lamps will spill into Hob Hey Wood and rural zones. This ruins habitat for nocturnal species and affects human sleep cycles. Light pollution has a detrimental effect on bats. There are seven species present in Hob Hey Wood including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle. Moths are also affected by light pollution. Source: Cheshire West AQMA Action Plan – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/pests-pollution-food-safety/pollution-and-air-quality/air-quality-review-and-assessment/action-plans/action-plan-frodsham-0118.pdf Source: Bat Conservation Trust Guidance NoteGN08/23Bats and Artificial Lighting At Night. Source: Impact of light pollution on moth morphology–A 137-year study in Germany https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.05.004 ). Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation Will Rise New estates without integrated planning lead to social fragmentation. These areas become disconnected, under-policed, and under-supported. This isn’t speculation. It’s known from other developments nationally. The National Planning Policy Framework requires that growth supports community cohesion. This proposal does not. It isolates new homes on the edge of town and dumps responsibility for cohesion onto already stretched services. Source: NPPF (2023) – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/ ). Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source:  Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e  

Comment

Representation ID: 14129

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Emily Evans

I&O_14672
I am writing to object to policies SS41, SS42, and SS43. Building homes on the protected greenbelt next to Hob Hey Wood in Frodsham would have a significant negative impact on the community, for the following reasons:   Destruction of our ancient woodland, orchard and rare species with worse air quality, light & noise pollution, contamination, and predators like cats. •Destruction of vital wildlife corridors, cutting animals and insects off from food, mates, and safe migration routes. Loss of the woodland and fields to walk, and views that bring local residents peace. Hundreds more cars on our roads, leading to more potholes, congestion & danger. Even longer delays to get an appointment with a GP or dentist. Local children struggling to get into local schools.

Comment

Representation ID: 14160

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Sally Haslewood

I&O_14704
I wish to record my objection to the potential new homes planned to be built near Hob Hey Wood in Frodsham. I’m therefore objecting to SS41, SS42 and SS43. This area of Frodsham is not suitable for new homes. It would present a flood risk and increased traffic problems especially on Fluin Lane. I live at [address redacted] which is already a busy and noisy road with the traffic for Delamere. Frodsham does not have the infrastructure to cope with the increased number of new houses proposed in the planning proposals. The new houses would also destroy a beautiful area of ancient woodland and wildlife corridors which would detract from the appeal of living in a rural market town (which is what Frodsham is). In any event I do not consider there is a need for the new housing in this area since there is an abundance of properties for sale.

Comment

Representation ID: 14170

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Victoria Conway

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_14714
Yes, don’t build on FRO01 and FRO02. This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. Objections in detail   Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665958/ ). Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://nsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/published-documents/EN010153-000069-6.1_ES%20Vol%201%20Chapter%207%20Terrestrial%20Ecology.pdf Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/07/dog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/documents/parking-roads-and-travel/highways/flood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf Source: Financial Times – https://www.ft.com/content/ff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e  

Comment

Representation ID: 14171

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Ms S Cox

I&O_14715
FR001 is more remote from the town centre and would put a strain on road traffic volumes in current residential areas, requiring access to most amenities via Langdale Way, Fluin Lane, Blue Hatch, etc. More importantly, environmental loss (with all its implications) at Hob Hey wood and the riverside would be severe.  This is a very well-used and important green space for Frodsham residents to enjoy for their well-being and for children to have access to nature and wildlife safely, locally and without needing to use transport to get there. FR002 is largely given over to grazing livestock but has footpaths cutting through this area. Housing would remove another well-used and essential environmental escape used by many local walkers and dog owners and ruin the exceptional scenic view across the Weaver valley, providing a respite from the largely industrial views from Frodsham town in other directions. This south-eastern edge of Frodsham should remain the green space amenity for Frodsham that is heavily used by runners, ramblers, and especially families. I believe that the proposal to accept development within FR001 and FR002 is counter to National Planning Policy on greenbelt.

Comment

Representation ID: 14178

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Elaine Scott

I&O_14722
I have lived in Alvanley for twenty five years and the local area for fifty five years. One of the main reasons I have chosen to stay here with my family is because of the green spaces available. I am writing to object to SS44, SS45, and SS46 for the planning of HEL01, HEL02, and HEL03. I would also like to object to SS41, SS42, and SS43 for the planning of FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03. My reasoning for this includes adding pressure to already strained infrastructure. Including access to schools, doctors, dentists. The risk of floods and improper infrastructure in place to drain this, particularly in Alvanley. There would also be negative impacts on wildlife with the destruction of natural habitats and increased light and air pollution. There is also the worry of dropping house prices to consider in an already uncertain economic time. Overall, the proposed planning on green belt land has a negative impact on residents physical and mental health as it would take away our green spaces.

Comment

Representation ID: 14190

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: James Roberts and Nichola Lee

I&O_14734
I strongly object to proposals FR001 and FR002 because they would cause lasting and irreversible harm to Hob Hey Wood, its wildlife, and the wider community.   My key concerns are:   Loss of ancient woodland and natural habitat: Once destroyed, this cannot be replaced. The woodland supports rare species and provides essential ecosystem services such as clean air and pollination.   Destruction of vital wildlife corridors: Cutting through the wood will isolate animals and insects from food sources, breeding areas, and safe migration routes, accelerating biodiversity decline.   Impact on community health and wellbeing: Hob Hey Wood is a valued green space where people walk, exercise, and find peace. Removing this will reduce opportunities for mental and physical wellbeing.   Infrastructure pressure: More houses will increase traffic, potholes, congestion, and pollution, while local services such as GPs, dentists, and schools are already under heavy strain.   Negative effect on local residents: More noise, worse air quality will harm those who already live here.   This proposal prioritises short-term development over long-term sustainability. Hob Hey Wood is irreplaceable, and once lost, it is gone forever.   I urge you to reject REF: FR001 and FR002 to protect our environment, community, and future.

Comment

Representation ID: 14243

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Judith Critchley

I&O_14787
FRO01 Frodsham EAST: East of Townfield Lane Fully support the many comments from Frodsham residents regarding the protection of our green belt and ancient woodland, Hob Hey Wood. Building adjacent to it would cause serious harm. The remaining land if farmed and important for food production. Access to/from homes on that land would significantly increase traffic on a narrow road already congested with residential parking. FRO02 Frodsham SOUTH: East of Kingsley Road Fully support the many comments from Frodsham residents regarding the historical significance of Bradley fields. Green belt agricultural land and important for food production FRO03 Frodsham WEST: North of Marsh Green Green belt agricultural land and important for food production. Taken alongside Helsby HEL01, Frodsham and Helsby would no have any separation. Area HEL01, as marked on the Helsby Map appears to include part of Frodsham (The boundary is Godscroft Lane)