Comment

Representation ID: 10504

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Debbie Gayle

I&O_11002
As a frequent visitor to the Frodsham and as a property owner in the area l am writing to state my objections to the proposed building of new housing stock on the 3 sites in Frodsham;  namely SS41,SS42 and SS43. Frodsham will lose ancient woodland due to the destruction of Hob Hey Wood. In addition the rare species and other wildlife will be adversely affected due to lose of habitat and light pollution.  The increase in numbers of houses without the necessary infrastructure will result in clusters of families isolated from the wider communities leading to an inevitable rise in antisocial behaviour, not to mention lack of resources on the already stressed education, health and social care services. Traffic in the area is already at breaking point at several times during the week and as soon as there are problems on the M56, traffic diverts through the town causing mayhem and  protracted delayes. The increase in housing will only worsen an already unacceptable problem.  There is also an increased risk of flooding, an increase in air pollution and a decrease in property value. I object to these proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 10611

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jean Knowles

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_11109
I wish to record my objection to proposals FRO01 and FRO02 for possible housing development  in the two areas near to Hob Hey ancient woodland. Hob Hey wood is a much valued recreational area for local people and the proposal to build on adjacent green belt land would cause detrimental effects both to the wood itself and the wildlife living in the wood due to increased disturbance and light pollution. It would also destroy wildlife corridors.

Comment

Representation ID: 10698

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Rachel Downham

I&O_11196
I am writing to formally object to the proposed developments set out under Policies SS41, SS42 and SS43 relating to land by Hob Hey Wood in Frodsham. Hob Hey Wood is one of Frodsham’s most valuable community and environmental assets. It is an ancient woodland, a designated Local Nature Reserve, and an irreplaceable habitat for a wide range of wildlife. The proposals to build on the neighbouring land raise serious concerns on several grounds: Environmental impact Ancient woodlands are protected due to their ecological and historical importance. Any development nearby risks damaging the delicate ecosystems, root systems, and biodiversity that have developed over centuries. Building in this area threatens habitats for bats, owls, woodpeckers, amphibians, and other species that depend on Hob Hey Wood’s unique environment. Development would likely increase noise, light pollution, and chemical run-off, all of which would degrade the woodland. Flooding and water management Hob Hey Wood plays a critical role in natural drainage and flood prevention for the surrounding area. Developing adjacent land could increase the risk of flooding for Frodsham residents, particularly as climate change intensifies rainfall. The site acts as a natural carbon sink and water filter, helping to manage air and water quality locally. Community and heritage value Hob Hey Wood is used by local residents for walking, wellbeing, education, and recreation. It is a vital community green space that supports mental and physical health. The wood forms part of Frodsham’s cultural and historical heritage; its loss or degradation would irreversibly diminish the character of the town. Policy and planning considerations National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that development should not result in the loss or deterioration of irreplaceable habitats such as ancient woodland, except in wholly exceptional circumstances. There are alternative brownfield and less sensitive sites within Cheshire West that would be far more appropriate for development and would meet housing or commercial needs without destroying critical natural assets. Traffic and infrastructure Additional development in this area would place significant strain on local roads, schools, and health services, which are already under pressure. There are already substantial housing developments underway in nearby Helsby, which will add further demand on local infrastructure that already struggles to cope with the existing population. The proposed site does not have sustainable transport links, leading to further car dependency and increased emissions. Conclusion Hob Hey Wood and the surrounding land should be protected for future generations. Once destroyed, ancient woodland and its ecosystems cannot be replaced. I therefore urge the Council to reject the proposals under Policies SS41, SS42 and SS43, and to ensure Hob Hey Wood and the surrounding area remains safeguarded as a vital natural, cultural, and community asset for Frodsham and the surrounding area. 

Comment

Representation ID: 10726

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheryl Lockley

FRO01 FRO02
I&O_11224
I would like to add my objection to the above planning policy relating to Hob Hey Wood Ref FRO01 and FRO02.

Comment

Representation ID: 10730

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Andrew & Emily Griffiths

I&O_11228
I am writing to formally object to the proposed development on Green Belt land next to Hob Hey Wood under policies SS41, SS42, and SS43. I strongly oppose this plan for the following reasons: • Increased Flood Risk: Building on this land would heighten the risk of flooding in the local area, putting homes and infrastructure at risk. • Traffic & Gridlock: Frodsham’s roads are already under pressure, and additional housing will cause further congestion and delays. • Pressure on Public Services: Local GPs, dentists, and schools are already stretched. This development would place further strain on vital services. • Environmental & Wildlife Impact: Hob Hey Wood is an important ecological site. Development would destroy wildlife corridors, damage ancient woodland, and threaten local biodiversity. • Air Quality & Light Pollution: More housing will worsen air quality and increase light pollution, harming both people and wildlife. • Falling House Prices & Community Impact: The loss of countryside and green space will reduce the attractiveness of the area, affecting property values and community wellbeing. The Green Belt exists to protect the countryside, prevent urban sprawl, and safeguard areas like Hob Hey Wood for future generations. Once it is lost, it cannot be replaced. For these reasons, I urge Cheshire West & Chester Council to reject the proposed development and protect our countryside.

Comment

Representation ID: 10802

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Boulton

I&O_11300
I wish to object to Buildng plans next to Hob Hey wood 

Comment

Representation ID: 10813

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Vince and Bev Akers

I&O_11311
I am contacting you regarding policies SS41, SS42, and SS43. I would like to stress that I am in total opposition to these matters for the following reasons. Please ad the following salient comments to your growing list of objections. Having worked in Agriculture during my formative years in the locality and, having watched crops be grown and harvested on most of the fields within the plans, it would be a total loss of good grade agricultural land, which I believe the majority of which is protected Green Belt land, new land cannot be found to replace fields. Many of the fields have ponds within them which are valuable to native wildlife. Many of the fields have public footpaths crossing them which are a valuable asset to local residents.  Some of the areas border Hob Hey Wood which I am sure you will be aware is  ancient woodland, another valuable asset to the area which is home to a vast array of wildlife flora and fauna and is enjoyed by large numbers of locals for daily exercise. The woodland is maintained by a large group of volunteers. Fields around the woodland provide wildlife corridors. Any large scale construction would disturb all of the above. We cannot allow anything to damage the area of Antient Woodland. Loss of public space and a potential drop in house prices. A  large housing development  would increase run off from the roads which could pose further risks to wildlife. The roads in and around Frodsham barley cope with the traffic levels that we currently have so, to add a hundred houses would potentially add 100 to 200 car journeys per day on local roads, add a thousand houses and this could result in 1000 to 2000 journeys per day as an absolute minimum. Furthermore this could easily be doubled or trebled taking into account journeys to work, shopping, school or medical appointments. This would be further exacerbated if there are problems which often occur when there are problems on the M56 Motorway. Currently, there is limited availability in Schools, Doctors and Dentists. Any development would require the existing services to be increased to cope. Degradation of air quality and increased light pollution. The local roads, Ellis Lane, Langdale way, Townfield Lane, Bradley Lane and Kingsley road only just cope with current traffic levels.  There is a very large development of properties in the neighbouring village of Helsby which remain unsold and there is also an application for 91 properties to be build on land opposite Castle Park which both need to be taken into account. My 8 year old granddaughter would like to add that she loves visiting Hob Hey Wood and does not want to see any construction on the surrounding fields.

Comment

Representation ID: 10911

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Evans

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_11409
Objection to proposed development, FRO01 and FRO02 As a resident of Frodsham l am writing to state my objections to the proposed release of greenbelt land for building of new housing stock on the 3 sites in Frodsham;  namely FRO01 and FRO02. Frodsham will lose ancient woodland due to the destruction of Hob Hey Wood. In addition the rare species and other wildlife will be adversely affected due to lose of habitat and light pollution.  The increase in numbers of houses without the necessary infrastructure will result in clusters of families isolated from the wider communities leading to an inevitable rise in antisocial behaviour, not to mention lack of resources on the already stressed education, health and social care services. Traffic in the area is already beyond breaking point at several times during the week and as soon as there are problems on the M56, traffic diverts through the town causing mayhem and  protracted delays. Any small traffic light controlled roadworks e.g. pothole repairs near Fluin Lane,  have caused severe delays to traffic along the high street and exiting from Fluin lane. These delays have added 20-30 minutes in each direction. Additional vehicles from new housing will only worsen an already unacceptable problem.  There is also an increased risk of flooding, an increase in air pollution and a decrease in property value. I object to these proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 10990

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jack Makin

I&O_11488
I want to formally announce my objection to the following policies in relation to the development of housing on green belt land next to Hob Hey wood. SS42

Comment

Representation ID: 11078

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Claire Silk

I&O_11576
I am objecting to policies SS41, SS42 and SS43.  It would be a huge mistake to destroy this woodland area and the habitats of the animals that live there. The road infrastructure couldn’t handle more housing in areas 1 and 2 that are proposed. We have just moved to Frodsham and the biggest draw was the surrounding green areas - these plans would ruin what is special and important to people that live here and also would financially disadvantage everyone as house prices would likely decrease.  There are so many other areas that are available for development, please don’t ruin this one. 

Comment

Representation ID: 11081

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Madeleine McCraight

I&O_11579
I am a local resident and a volunteer for the hobhey ancient woodland site. We are very distressed that there is consideration to build  houses close to this site which is one of the few remaining ancient woodlands. Any buildings, roads, infrastructure etc will significantly impact on the immense biodiversity that this site offers. I am also a plot holder on the adjacent allotments and am concerned for the future of these incredibly valuable sites which grow much of our food and are an amazing resource for people without access to gardens. I do hope you will take local concerns into consideration when making your assessments.

Comment

Representation ID: 11083

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Lilian Ward

SS 42
I&O_11581
I would like to object to policies SS41, SS42 AND SS43 on the following basis:  - Increased flood risk - More gridlock on Frodsham Roads - Strain on GPs, Dentists and Schools  - Destruction of Wildlife Corridors - Damage to Ancient Woodland  - Worse air quality and light pollution  - Falling house prices - Loss of community and Green Space

Comment

Representation ID: 11098

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Valerie Nield

SS 42
I&O_11596
I object to policies SS41, SS42 and SS43. This proposal, FRO01 and FRO02, will only exacerbate problems with gridlocked roads, strain on doctors and dentists and schools, not to mention loss of wildlife corridors etc and I totally reject it.

Comment

Representation ID: 11119

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Chris Jones

FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03
I&O_11617
I am writing to formally object to the proposed housing developments on sites FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03 in Frodsham. These parcels of Green Belt land, opposite my home on Kingsley Road and bordering Hob Hey Wood, would have a severe and lasting negative impact on my family, my neighbours, the wider community and the wildlife.  My objections are as follows: Flood Risk – FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03 act as natural drainage land. Removing them will increase surface water flooding to nearby homes, including mine. Frodsham already has a history of flooding (e.g. Langdale Way), and these fields are essential in preventing repeat incidents. Traffic & Congestion – The A56, Kingsley Road, and surrounding routes are already heavily congested, especially when the M56 is closed. Hundreds of additional vehicles from these sites will worsen gridlock and make it harder for emergency vehicles to get through, endangering lives. Pressure on Local Services – GPs, dentists, and schools in Frodsham are already oversubscribed. New housing on FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03 would overwhelm these services, with no improvements planned. Environmental Harm – Hob Hey Wood is an ancient woodland and a Site of Biological Interest. FRO01 and FRO02 form vital wildlife corridors connecting to the wood, while FRO03 would create a huge conurbation between Frodsham and Helsby. These developments would sever habitats permanently, destroying biodiversity. Air Quality & Light Pollution – Increased traffic and large-scale development will damage both human health and wildlife. Loss of Rural Buffer & Character – These sites form part of Frodsham’s Green Belt and countryside setting. Development here would permanently erode the town’s rural identity, reduce house values, and take away much-loved green space. For these reasons, I urge the Council to remove sites FRO01, FRO02, and FRO03 from the Local Plan. Building here is unsustainable, unjustified, and in direct conflict with Green Belt policy.

Comment

Representation ID: 11152

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Charlie Close

I&O_11650
I am writing to formally object to the proposed policies SS41, SS42 and SS43 , which relate to future housing development around Hob Hey Wood, Frodsham . Hob Hey Wood is a unique and much-valued ancient woodland, serving not only as an important ecological site but also as a vital community green space. The proposed development poses a significant threat to the integrity and character of this area for the following reasons: Environmental Impact Hob Hey Wood is recognised for its biodiversity, supporting a wide range of plant and wildlife species. Any development adjacent to or encroaching upon the woodland risks damaging delicate habitats and disrupting ecological balance. Increased housing would bring additional light, noise, and pollution pressures, threatening the long-term sustainability of the woodland environment. Community and Wellbeing The wood is widely used by residents for recreation, walking, exercise, and wellbeing. Development nearby would fundamentally change the character of the area, reducing public enjoyment and the sense of tranquillity. Green spaces like Hob Hey Wood are increasingly essential for mental health, physical activity, and social cohesion, especially in a growing community like Frodsham. Infrastructure and Sustainability Concerns The local infrastructure, including roads, schools, and healthcare provision, is already under pressure. Additional housing developments under SS41, SS42 and SS43 would exacerbate these challenges without offering sustainable solutions. Development of this scale risks undermining the Council’s own climate and sustainability objectives, contradicting commitments to protect biodiversity and promote a green future. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Council to reconsider and withdraw policies SS41, SS42 and SS43 . Preserving Hob Hey Wood is not only about protecting the environment, but also about safeguarding an irreplaceable community asset for current and future generations. Thank you for considering my objection. I trust that the Council will give due weight to the environmental and social value of Hob Hey Wood and take steps to ensure its protection from development.

Comment

Representation ID: 11208

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah Gunning

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_11706
I am writing to object strongly to the planning application referenced above for the following planning reasons: Harm to Trees, Hedgerows, and Wildlife The proposed development would result in the loss of mature trees, hedgerows, and natural habitats that support local wildlife. These elements are crucial for biodiversity and cannot be replaced. Green Belt / Countryside Character The land appears to fall within designated Green Belt or countryside protection zones where new development is inappropriate. The proposal would reduce openness and undermine the purpose of protecting the countryside from encroachment.  Adverse Effect on Local Wildlife This wooded green space supports numerous species, and the disruption of this habitat would have a detrimental environmental impact. Landscape and Community Value The site provides a visual and recreational buffer to both residents and wildlife. Its removal would degrade local amenity and character. This countryside and woodland are beloved by many. The area provides rich pleasure and solace to the community while serving as a vital habitat for trees, plants, and wildlife. Research shows that visits to woodlands in England contribute around £162   million per year in terms of mental health benefits alone, underscoring its immense public value Forest Research . Across the UK, woodland recreation and tourism reached nearly 748   million visits , worth £907   million annually Office for National Statistics . Moreover, exposure to woodlands supports cognitive development and lowers emotional and behavioural issues in children and adolescents UK Research and Innovation University College London . Simply put, allowing development here would not only devastate irreplaceable wildlife and natural beauty—but also inflict catastrophic harm on community wellbeing, public health, and the natural balance we rely upon. I urge the Council to refuse permission due to all of the above. I look forward to your acknowledgment of this objection. Please confirm receipt and that it has been taken into consideration. Yours sincerely,

Comment

Representation ID: 11306

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

FRO01, FRO02, FRO03
I&O_11804
FRO01 Frodsham EAST: East of Townfield Lane Fully support the many comments from Frodsham residents regarding the protection of our green belt and ancient woodland, Hob Hey Wood. Building adjacent to it would cause serious harm. The remaining land if farmed and important for food production. Access to/from homes on that land would significantly increase traffic on a narrow road already congested with residential parking. FRO02 Frodsham SOUTH: East of Kingsley Road Fully support the many comments from Frodsham residents regarding the historical significance of Bradley fields. Green belt agricultural land and important for food production FRO03 Frodsham WEST: North of Marsh Green Green belt agricultural land and important for food production. Taken alongside Helsby HEL01, Frodsham and Helsby would no have any separation. Area HEL01, as marked on the Helsby Map appears to include part of Frodsham (The boundary is Godscroft Lane)

Comment

Representation ID: 11329

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Leo Gunning

FR001 FR002
I&O_11827
I am writing to object  strongly  to the planning application referenced above for the following planning reasons: Harm to Trees, Hedgerows, and Wildlife The proposed development would result in the loss of mature trees, hedgerows, and natural habitats that support local wildlife. These elements are crucial for biodiversity and cannot be replaced. Green Belt / Countryside Character The land appears to fall within designated Green Belt or countryside protection zones where new development is inappropriate. The proposal would reduce openness and undermine the purpose of protecting the countryside from encroachment.  Adverse Effect on Local Wildlife This wooded green space supports numerous species, and the disruption of this habitat would have a detrimental environmental impact. Landscape and Community Value The site provides a visual and recreational buffer to both residents and wildlife. Its removal would degrade local amenity and character. This countryside and woodland are beloved by many. The area provides rich pleasure and solace to the community while serving as a vital habitat for trees, plants, and wildlife. Research shows that visits to woodlands in England contribute around  £162   million per year  in terms of mental health benefits alone, underscoring its immense public value  Forest Research . Across the UK, woodland recreation and tourism reached nearly  748   million visits , worth  £907   million annually   Office for National Statistics . Moreover, exposure to woodlands supports cognitive development and lowers emotional and behavioural issues in children and adolescents  UK Research and Innovation University College London . Simply put, allowing development here would not only devastate irreplaceable wildlife and natural beauty—but also inflict catastrophic harm on community wellbeing, public health, and the natural balance we rely upon. I urge the Council to refuse permission due to all of the above.

Comment

Representation ID: 11340

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: David Steele

I&O_11838
I am writing to you to express concerns over the potential plans to build houses near Hob Hey Wood in frodsham. This would be disastrous in terms of the beautiful countryside and lack of green, family friendly areas nearby.

Comment

Representation ID: 11462

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Steve Bowle

I&O_11960
I don’t want to walk down to Hob Hey wood in Frodsham through a housing estate!!

Comment

Representation ID: 11472

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Gunning

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_11970
I am writing to object strongly to the planning application referenced above for the following planning reasons: Harm to Trees, Hedgerows, and Wildlife The proposed development would result in the loss of mature trees, hedgerows, and natural habitats that support local wildlife. These elements are crucial for biodiversity and cannot be replaced. Green Belt / Countryside Character The land appears to fall within designated Green Belt or countryside protection zones where new development is inappropriate. The proposal would reduce openness and undermine the purpose of protecting the countryside from encroachment.  Adverse Effect on Local Wildlife This wooded green space supports numerous species, and the disruption of this habitat would have a detrimental environmental impact. Landscape and Community Value The site provides a visual and recreational buffer to both residents and wildlife. Its removal would degrade local amenity and character. This countryside and woodland are beloved by many. The area provides rich pleasure and solace to the community while serving as a vital habitat for trees, plants, and wildlife. Research shows that visits to woodlands in England contribute around £162 million per year in terms of mental health benefits alone, underscoring its immense public value Forest Research. Across the UK, woodland recreation and tourism reached nearly 748 million visits, worth £907 million annually Office for National Statistics. Moreover, exposure to woodlands supports cognitive development and lowers emotional and behavioural issues in children and adolescents UK Research and InnovationUniversity College London. Simply put, allowing development here would not only devastate irreplaceable wildlife and natural beauty—but also inflict catastrophic harm on community wellbeing, public health, and the natural balance we rely upon. I urge the Council to refuse permission due to all of the above.

Comment

Representation ID: 11542

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12040
There should be no building on Green Belt or best quality farmland (e.g. the swathe of Grade Two agricultural land to the east and south east).

Comment

Representation ID: 11784

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Glover

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_12282
Dear Sirs I am writing to lodge my objection to the proposed building of houses on the protected green belt  land next to Hob Hey Wood, Frodsham ie policies SS41, SS42 and SS43. My objections are based on a) the loss of valued land and b) the effects such plans would have on Frodsham and its residents The fields in question are prime agricultural land. They have for decades produced tons of produce thereby supporting the level of food self-sufficiency for the country, something which we need to increase, not decrease. At the same time, these fields have provided habitats for a range of mammals, birds, and insects as well as plants and trees, all contributing to the quality of the local environment which itself has benefited the health and well-being of residents and visitors. I recognise, of course, that there is a need for more homes but, it seems to me, to make more sense to identify brown field sites for building long before we consider destroying our green belt areas. I also recognise that Frodsham just does not have the infrastructure to cope with a huge increase in its population. The current primary schools, the secondary school that we share with Helsby, the GP surgery and dental provision could not cope with the enormous increased demand for their services and the pressures on the water supply, sewerage and gas and electricity could only be met if more building on more valuable land took place. Added to this, Frodsham’s road system, built to service the needs of previous centuries, now struggles, frequently, to cope with the present volume of traffic. Clearly there will be individuals who will benefit financially if this proposal goes ahead but these individuals are not the people who would have to cope with the results of such a decision. I sincerely doubt that you would find many inhabitants of Frodsham who would support the proposals and I would urge those tasked with considering these proposals and who represent the interests of Frodsham inhabitants to vote against the proposals. Yours Faithfully,

Comment

Representation ID: 11796

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Alfie Gunning

FR001 FR002
I&O_12294
I am writing to object strongly to the planning application referenced above for the following planning reasons: Harm to Trees, Hedgerows, and Wildlife The proposed development would result in the loss of mature trees, hedgerows, and natural habitats that support local wildlife. These elements are crucial for biodiversity and cannot be replaced. Green Belt / Countryside Character The land appears to fall within designated Green Belt or countryside protection zones where new development is inappropriate. The proposal would reduce openness and undermine the purpose of protecting the countryside from encroachment.  Adverse Effect on Local Wildlife This wooded green space supports numerous species, and the disruption of this habitat would have a detrimental environmental impact. Landscape and Community Value The site provides a visual and recreational buffer to both residents and wildlife. Its removal would degrade local amenity and character. This countryside and woodland are beloved by many. The area provides rich pleasure and solace to the community while serving as a vital habitat for trees, plants, and wildlife. Research shows that visits to woodlands in England contribute around £162 million per year in terms of mental health benefits alone, underscoring its immense public value Forest Research. Across the UK, woodland recreation and tourism reached nearly 748 million visits, worth £907 million annually Office for National Statistics. Moreover, exposure to woodlands supports cognitive development and lowers emotional and behavioural issues in children and adolescents UK Research and InnovationUniversity College London. Simply put, allowing development here would not only devastate irreplaceable wildlife and natural beauty—but also inflict catastrophic harm on community wellbeing, public health, and the natural balance we rely upon. I urge the Council to refuse permission due to all of the above.  

Comment

Representation ID: 11816

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Alex Watson

SS42
I&O_12314
I would like to register my objection to policies SS41, SS42 and SS43.

Comment

Representation ID: 11838

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Lyn Nicholson

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_12337
Question SS 42 Do you have any further comments about any of the potential growth areas identified around Frodsham? Yes. Do not build on FRO01 and FRO02. These are 2 sections of greenbelt land are border Hob Hey Wood ( increasingly rare ancient woodland home to thousands of species) and provide a rural buffer, which decrease flood risks and provide a wildlife corridor I am sure that you will have had a detailed breakdown as to why wildlife corridors, significant disturbance to the woodland and the flood risk concerns should be taken seriously

Comment

Representation ID: 11877

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Eric J Wynne

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_12391
As a resident of Frodsham, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed plans and policies laid out in SS41, SS42 and SS43. In addition,  I  am saying NO to Ref.: FRO01 and FRO02. Additional traffic in Frodsham will only add to regular issues of gridlocking the already congested roads.  I believe that schools and doctors surgeries are already at capacity and additional residents would only add to the issues that already exist.   

Comment

Representation ID: 11883

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Janet Wynne

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_12397
As a Frodsham resident, I am writing to oppose the plans and policies laid out in SS41,SS42 and SS43. In addition I am saying NO to Ref:FRO1 and FRO2. We simply do not have the infrastructure to deal with additional traffic, as the village regularly gets gridlocked.  Schools and Dr's surgeries are all full to capacity.  Destruction of our ancient woodland and wildlife.  These plans must not be passed!!!!

Comment

Representation ID: 11962

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Natalie Smith

I&O_12476
Yes, don’t build on FRO01 and FRO02. This is not a polite suggestion. It is a firm and direct objection to building on FR001 and FR002, two parcels of Greenbelt land that border Hob Hey Wood and form part of Frodsham’s only remaining rural buffer. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning: it increases flood risk, overloads roads, strains local services, destroys wildlife routes, and rips up national policy. If approved, it will damage the town and everyone in it. Objections in detail Severe Impact on Ancient Woodland Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest and ancient woodland, Britain’s most biodiverse habitat. The wood is home to thousands of species varying from common, to locally scarce, to nationally rare. Over 800 species are listed on the national biological recording site iRecord. Many species only occur in ancient woodland, an increasingly rare habitat. The wood is a haven for both wildlife and local people who enjoy walking the woodland and reaping the benefits of being in nature such as reduced anxiety and depression. Improvements to the immune system and reduced blood pressure also result from time spent in nature. Source: Nature and Mental Health Report’, Mind. Source: ( https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Farticles%2FPMC9665958%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C1bf74fa1d3c445e29f3008dde6383b57%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638919851691183435%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5esia0JaJYP9HULZlLVWCNHNHWY7nMSq1xvkneiBr64%3D&reserved=0 ). Wildlife Corridors Will Be Destroyed Hob Hey Wood is not a decorative patch of trees. It is a functioning woodland used by many species that need access to the surrounding environment. The wood connects to wider habitat corridors through the FR001 and FR002 areas. These corridors keep the ecology alive. Building here breaks those links forever. You can’t replace a hedgerow or regenerate a breeding ground once it’s buried under concrete. Source: Planning Inspectorate – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnsip-documents.planninginspectorate.gov.uk%2Fpublished-documents%2FEN010153-000069-6.1_ES%2520Vol%25201%2520Chapter%25207%2520Terrestrial%2520Ecology.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C1bf74fa1d3c445e29f3008dde6383b57%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638919851691214061%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QrVHJxxD%2FmIq%2BDU%2BcqNiggeQOkhDywDlz0JPRNch1W4%3D&reserved=0 Significant Disturbance to The Woodland Hob Hey is relatively secluded. Building hundreds of houses nearby could lead to significant disturbance of the woodland and its wildlife. The resulting huge increase in pets would result in problems. Cats are supreme predators which would take a toll on wildlife. Dogs would also disturb wildlife and their feces have been shown to cause nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. Source: https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2022%2Ffeb%2F07%2Fdog-pee-and-poo-harming-nature-reserves-study&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C1bf74fa1d3c445e29f3008dde6383b57%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638919851691230450%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FXeEfognizTQalq0TwzApj62PG3ilresZblAL4vB4MA%3D&reserved=0 Flood Risk is Not a Hypothetical Surface water flooding is the biggest threat to homes in England today. Over 4.6 million homes are now at risk from it. That’s double the number at risk from rivers or coastal surge. In Frodsham, those risks already exist. Hob Hey Wood and the green land around it act as a sponge. They slow rain and reduce flood peaks. Building on FR002 and FR001 means water runs off faster, overloading drains and pushing into homes and roads. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment warns against removing these natural barriers. From the late 1990’s to 2005 this happened in Langdale Way! Residents experienced multiple sewerage floods leading to a campaign involving both the council and United Utilities to resolve the issue before the houses became uninsurable. This resulted in a year long disruptive excavation at Manor House School fields to install huge tanks to stem the catastrophic floods. UU stated that this was the only site that that type of construction could take place. House building adjacent could result in these issues arising again! Source: Cheshire West SFRA – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%2Fdocuments%2Fparking-roads-and-travel%2Fhighways%2Fflood-risk-assessment-final-report.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C1bf74fa1d3c445e29f3008dde6383b57%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638919851691246431%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UBa8wMxuHynn7%2BMCTqF0I0njot6Zd%2BuzPPVwk86Wa90%3D&reserved=0 Source: Financial Times – https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcontent%2Fff3bb769-9339-4015-80bc-4a3ea446504e&data=05%7C02%7Cspatialplanning%40cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk%7C1bf74fa1d3c445e29f3008dde6383b57%7C9cd0230785364d0abe00c4062a2326a2%7C0%7C0%7C638919851691263504%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KJTMalS%2FhYBVv9HKRt1aeafUWyNTH6PSaRbomcHWP3U%3D&reserved=0  

Comment

Representation ID: 11964

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Judith Riches

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_12478
> I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of sites FRO01 and FRO02 in Frodsham. These areas fall within the Green Belt and border Hob Hey Wood, an irreplaceable area of ancient woodland and a valued community green space. I believe the proposals are unsound, unsustainable, and contrary to both local and national planning policy, for the following reasons: > 1. Green Belt Protection > The sites fall within the Green Belt. National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) paragraphs 137–140 make clear that Green Belt can only be released in exceptional circumstances. No such circumstances have been demonstrated here. Development would undermine the permanence of the Green Belt, contribute to urban sprawl, and set a damaging precedent. > 2. Unjustified Housing Targets and Alternative Land Supply The housing > targets underpinning the Local Plan are significantly higher than ONS household growth projections, and therefore unjustified. Development should prioritise brownfield land and vacant industrial sites within existing settlements, not productive agricultural or Green Belt land. Much of FRO01 and FRO02 comprises best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1–3A) that should be protected. > 3. Traffic Congestion and Highway Safety Frodsham already experiences > severe congestion, particularly when the M56 is closed, when traffic is diverted through the town. A 2022 Highways England report showed traffic increases of 22% during such closures, impacting emergency vehicle access. Additional residential and construction traffic would worsen safety and congestion on already pressured roads such as the A56 and B5152. Cheshire Fire and Rescue have previously raised concerns about response times during peak events. > As a resident of the Langdale Way area, I can confirm that several times a year the road becomes completely gridlocked with stationary traffic. Although it is normally a very quiet residential street, it is heavily impacted during motorway incidents or local highway works when vehicles are diverted through the town. > At peak times – particularly during school drop-off and pick-up at Manor House School – congestion at the exit from the Lakes Estate (Langdale onto Fluin Lane) routinely causes delays of 15 minutes or more. Any further housing on the proposed sites would significantly worsen these already unsustainable traffic pressures. > 4. Strain on Local Infrastructure and Services Local services are > already overstretched: > GP and dental access in Cheshire West are below national averages, with local surgeries facing delays and NHS dentists not taking new patients. > Local schools, including Helsby High, are near capacity with no expansion plans. > Without significant up-front investment, new housing would place unsustainable strain on health, education, and public services. > 5. Flood Risk, Drainage, and Sewage Capacity The proposed development > would replace permeable land with hard surfaces, increasing runoff, surface water flooding, and sewer overload. Residents recall repeated sewer flooding in Langdale Way in the late 1990s–2000s, which required major intervention by United Utilities. Building on adjacent land risks a repeat of these problems. > 6. Biodiversity, Ancient Woodland, and Wildlife Corridors Hob Hey Wood > is a designated Site of Biological Interest and an irreplaceable ancient woodland, home to over 800 recorded species, including nationally rare and locally scarce wildlife. Development on FRO01 and FRO02 threatens: > Wildlife Corridors: Hedgerows and green links vital for species movement. > Pollution: Runoff, vehicle emissions, and light pollution would degrade habitats. > Disturbance: Increased human and pet activity would disrupt sensitive species, including bats (seven species recorded, including rare Nathusius’ pipistrelle) and invertebrates. > Once lost, ancient woodland cannot be replaced, making this a direct conflict with NPPF policy to protect irreplaceable habitats. > 7. Loss of Community Green Space > Hob Hey Wood and its surrounding fields are widely used by local residents for recreation, walking, and wellbeing. Studies consistently show that access to natural green space improves physical and mental health. Development here would permanently reduce the availability of safe, accessible green space for the community > 8. Unsustainable Spatial Strategy > CWAC’s strategy of concentrating growth around railway stations ignores the inadequacy of the local transport network. Trains to major cities are infrequent and overcrowded, while local roads are not designed for cycling or increased car use. This approach is unrealistic and contrary to the NPPF’s requirement that development be sustainable both environmentally and socially. > 9. Conflict with Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan The Frodsham > Neighbourhood Plan, a legally significant local policy, prioritises the protection of green spaces, enhancement of biodiversity, and management of traffic. Development of FRO01 and FRO02 conflicts with these aims and should therefore be refused. > 10. Concerns About the Consultation Process > Residents who attended the CWAC consultation Q&A session in Winsford reported deeply concerning levels of unpreparedness and misinformation: > Staff appeared unaware of the true location, biodiversity value, and ancient woodland status of Hob Hey. > Hedgerows, ponds, tree preservation orders, and flood risks were not acknowledged. > The decision to hold the Q&A in Winsford, away from Frodsham residents most directly affected, limited local engagement. > This raises serious questions about the adequacy and transparency of the consultation process. At best, it suggests a lack of due diligence; at worst, it implies an attempt to minimise local scrutiny of unsuitable site allocations. Either way, this undermines public confidence and should be taken into account when considering the soundness of the Local Plan. > Conclusion > The proposed development of FRO01 and FRO02 is unsound and contrary to multiple provisions of the NPPF and the Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan. It would cause unacceptable harm to the Green Belt, biodiversity, ancient woodland, flood resilience, local infrastructure, and community wellbeing. > For these reasons, I strongly urge that the application be refused and that development be redirected towards brownfield sites within existing settlements.