Comment

Representation ID: 8179

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Rachel Mowbray

SS41
I&O_8668
Building in these areas will lead to : Worse gridlock on A56 and surrounding roads. Further strain on our Doctors, Dentists, schools. Increased flood risk.  Destruction of wildlife corridors. Damage to Ancient Woodland. Worse air quality and light pollution. Loss of community and green space.  

Comment

Representation ID: 8184

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs D Chadwick

I&O_8673
Objections to policesSS41  SS42 SS43.  No more walking in our woodland.  More pressure on our Doctors Surgery and Schools. Commuting to Frodsham more difficult due to increased traffic as we already have grid locks now when it’s holiday time at peak periods and also when M56 has closures. Please stop this building project.

Comment

Representation ID: 8189

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Dr Henry Finch

Map 5.10
I&O_8678
FR003 is the area of Frodsham most suitable for expansion, being closest to the town centre with excellent road access to the A56 (Chester Road).    The nearby Helsby High School is already attended by pupils from all parts of the town. 

Comment

Representation ID: 8198

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Catrin Jones

SS41
I&O_8687
To whom is may concern, My name is xxx , I live in xxx, In Frodsham. I’m writing to state my objections to the proposed building on the land by hob hey wood, an ancient woodland. I appreciate the housing crisis is taxing for our local area, but let’s be real these houses won’t be affordable for the young people of Frodsham to buy anyway. I am objecting to policies: SS41, SS42 and SS43. Thanks for your time,

Comment

Representation ID: 8200

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Andrew Helliwell

I&O_8689
Townfield Lane is situated very close to the land where the new homes are proposed, and the development would have a significant impact on my daily life. At present, it is a quiet and peaceful area, but the increase in traffic would bring noise and light pollution, and create congestion on local roads. This would particularly affect my daily commute in and out of Frodsham. My family and I also regularly walk around Hob Hey Wood, an ancient woodland at the end of our road. It is a treasured local space, home to a wide variety of wildlife, and I am very concerned that the development would cause lasting harm to this important natural environment. Frodsham itself is a small village with limited infrastructure. Additional housing on this scale would place unsustainable pressure on local services, including GPs, dentists and schools. My wife and I are planning to have children in the near future, and I want them to be able to attend local schools and grow up in a safe, quiet village with a strong sense of community. Finally, I am worried that such a development would make the area less desirable, leading to a decline in local house prices. Please could you reconsider the plan to build these new homes, in light of the concerns raised.

Comment

Representation ID: 8213

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Eleanor Helliwell

I&O_8702
Townfield Lane is situated very close to the land where the new homes are proposed, and the development would have a significant impact on my daily life. At present, it is a quiet and peaceful area, but the increase in traffic would bring noise and light pollution, and create congestion on local roads. This would particularly affect my daily commute in and out of Frodsham. My family and I also regularly walk around Hob Hey Wood, an ancient woodland at the end of our road. It is a treasured local space, home to a wide variety of wildlife, and I am very concerned that the development would cause lasting harm to this important natural environment. Frodsham itself is a small village with limited infrastructure. Additional housing on this scale would place unsustainable pressure on local services, including GPs, dentists and schools. My wife and I are planning to have children in the near future, and I want them to be able to attend local schools and grow up in a safe, quiet village with a strong sense of community. Finally, I am worried that such a development would make the area less desirable, leading to a decline in local house prices. Please could you reconsider the plan to build these new homes, in light of the concerns raised.

Comment

Representation ID: 8227

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Joe Laughton

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_8716
I strongly object to the proposed development on Green Belt land next to Hob Hey Wood (policies SS41, SS42, SS43, FR001, FR002). It would destroy wildlife corridors, damage ancient woodland, increase flood risk, worsen traffic and air pollution, and put more strain on local services, for example. It would also erode valuable community green space and the character of Frodsham’s countryside. Please reject this proposal in full.

Comment

Representation ID: 8271

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Tildsley

FRO01, FRO02
I&O_8760
Of the areas identified, FR001 and FR002 are completely unsuitable. I consider it not acceptable to destroy our greenbelt. According to National Policy” the Government attaches great importance to Green Belts!”  I list my other objections below; It adds pressure to failing infrastructure in the area. It increases flood risk.  It destroys wildlife corridors within the area. work has been undertaken by professionals and volunteers, over considerable years to improve, attract and sustain the wildlife here.  Extensive development and erosion of wildlife areas damages communities and it is not justified.  My other suggestions would be making use of the change of use policy re empty shops. Within the town making properties available for housing stock that have laying empty for years i.e. Amore, the empty Banks and the Station goods yard etc. We should also consider using new technology and methodology from other countries so that we can utilise available floodplain marshland outside the Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 8285

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Sue Benson

SS41
I&O_8774
FRO03 is most suitable for development due to a number of factors: It adjoins the A56, the main road running through Frodsham and connecting to the M56 FRO03 is relatively flat, which will encourage walking, cycling and wheeling, also having the advantage of new cycle lanes which were installed very recently FRO03 is relatively centrally placed between Frodsham and Helsby Rail stations and is on the main bus route FRO03 is within walking distance Helsby High school FRO03 is within easy reach of Castle Park, which has excellent play facilities, large green spaces and an Arts Centre, as well as Frodsham marshes. However, any increase in homes, people and cars would not be sustainable in Frodsham due to the other comments in my emailed responses.

Comment

Representation ID: 8305

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Samantha Chiffers

I&O_8794
This is to confirm that we strongly object to the following planning proposals:   SS41

Comment

Representation ID: 8323

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Patrick Cullen

SS41
I&O_8812
Good evening, I'm a resident in Frodsham (xxx) and I am objecting to policies SS41, SS42 and SS43. Kind regards

Comment

Representation ID: 8347

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Helen London

SS41
I&O_8836
I am writing to strongly object to the following proposed developments of Frodsham as identified in the local plan: Proposed development: FRO01 Proposed development: FRO02 Proposed development: FRO03 I am responding to questions SS41, SS42, SS43 on the consultation document. All 3 areas identified namely, (FRO01, FRO02 and FRO03) are all completely unsuitable for development for the following reasons: The proposed developments are in addition to the preceding development for 91 homes on the A56 opposite Castle Park plus also the plans to infill brown field plots within the exceeding town area. The proposed developments will add pressure to an already failing infrastructure.  There will be yet more gridlock on Frodsham roads.  Traffic in Frodsham (especially on the A56) is frequently very heavy at peak times.  In addition, roads are gridlocked when there is a traffic accident or heavy traffic on the M56. Thus compromising the free access/egress of emergency vehicles into Frodsham.  The A56, adjacent to the planned development opposite Castle Park, will become highly unsuitable for bicycles as it will pose an  increased risk for cyclists.   Trains in and out of Frodsham are often over crowded.  There will be strain on GPs, dentists and all schools (primary, Helsby High School as well as the special educational provision). There will be worse air quality and an increased risk of light pollution. There will be increased risk of flooding.  There will be significant destruction of wildlife corridors. There will be damage to ancient woodland. There will be a loss of community and green space areas.  Sports, recreation and community facilities will be oversubscribed, therefore compromising the health and wellbeing of residents.  Frodsham's Green Belt land must be protected.  Hob Hey Wood, our wildlife and our rural buffer must be protected.

Comment

Representation ID: 8377

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Andrei Spanu

I&O_8868
We are deeply concerned that further overpopulation in this area will have a detrimental impact on both our daily lives and the well-being of our community. The existing infrastructure is already under strain, with narrow roads struggling to accommodate current traffic levels, and the increase in vehicles will inevitably bring more congestion, noise, and pollution. Our quiet neighbourhood, valued for its character and tranquillity, would suffer significant decline. In addition, the limited local amenities already present challenges, which would only be worsened by the increased demand. This level of development risks undermining the safety, quality of life, and cohesion of the community we have built here. We understand the need for new housing, but surely there are other, more suitable areas where the infrastructure can support it. For these reasons, I strongly object to any further development around Townfield Lane.

Comment

Representation ID: 8383

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Lesley Mitchell

SS41
I&O_8874
Hi I’m XX of XXX and I’d like it to be registered that I’m objecting to policies SS41, SS42, and SS43 I’ve lived in Frodsham for over 40 years and regularly walk in Hob Hey Wood and the surrounding areas. I strongly object to the proposed development of homes on the protected Green Belt land next to Hob Hey Wood. I’m concerned about: Damage to the Ancient Woodland and the rare species that live there Destruction of vital Wildlife Corridors Loss of Community and Green Space important for fitness, relaxation and mental health Worse air quality and increased light and noise pollution Increased flood risk More gridlock on Frodsham roads More strain on our GP’s, dentists and schools I say NO to FRO01 and FRO02 Regards

Comment

Representation ID: 8387

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Ann Slater

SS41
I&O_8878
I strongly disagree that buildings should be built on policies SS41 ,SS42,SS43 , I moved to Frodsham 22 years ago with four children. I moved from a built up area which was not good for them .my children now have their own business. I have many happy times with them in hob hey wood .my children had never seen a pheasant. Mole, never seen a wood before and what lives there  .plus the traffic is bad enough in Frodsham. Please don't put buildings near the woods it will kill the wildlife off.

Comment

Representation ID: 8389

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Rob and Robert Cowell

SS41
I&O_8880
I wish to object to the above proposals as adding these properties to would put a strain on local facilities eg, doctors, dentists, schools etc. It would also hugely affect Hob Hey wood and the damage this would cause to the wildlife that currently inhibit this area.

Comment

Representation ID: 8401

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Jackie Cottrell

SS41
I&O_8892
The proposal to build 500 homes on the above is ludicrous. There is no infrastructure for this development in terms of roads and vehicular access, it will destroy valuable green belt land and will negatively impact on the lives of current residents in the area for many years to come, notwithstanding the damage to wildlife and the destruction of the countryside just for profit. It simply is not viable!. I strongly object to SS41 SS42 SS43

Comment

Representation ID: 8409

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Gina Kerry

SS41
I&O_8900
Hi We are objecting to policies SS41,SS42 and SS43 in regards to building homes on protected green belt land  – this proposal is threatening our beautiful countryside -what we have left

Comment

Representation ID: 8433

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: iain Bennett

SS41
I&O_8924
I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of over 1,300 houses in the areas designated as FRO01 and FRO02 in your Local Plan consultation. This proposal is a textbook example of poor planning that ignores fundamental principles of sustainable development and environmental protection. Wildlife Corridors and Ancient Woodland The proposed development sites, FRO01 and FRO02, are not isolated parcels of land. They are part of a crucial wildlife corridor that connects and supports the ancient woodland of Hob Hey Wood. Hob Hey is a Site of Biological Interest, an irreplaceable and highly biodiverse ecosystem that is home to thousands of species. Building on this land would sever these vital connections, isolating the woodland and leading to a significant decline in its biodiversity. Once these habitats are destroyed, they cannot be replaced. The Planning Inspectorate recognizes the importance of these corridors, and this proposal flies in the face of established ecological planning principles. Green Belt Policy and Flood Risk The areas in question are part of the protected Green Belt, a policy designed to prevent urban sprawl and preserve the open character of land. The proposed development directly contravenes this policy by building on land that acts as Frodsham's rural buffer. Furthermore, the land’s permeable nature is critical for managing flood risk. The Hob Hey Wood area acts as a natural sponge, absorbing rainwater and slowing surface runoff. The council's own Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) highlights the importance of these natural flood defenses. Paving over FRO01 and FRO02 would increase the speed and volume of runoff, putting existing homes at greater risk of devastating surface water flooding.   Infrastructure Strain Frodsham's infrastructure is already struggling. Our roads, particularly the A56, are frequently gridlocked. Adding hundreds of new houses would introduce hundreds of extra vehicles, further overwhelming the road network. This would not only worsen congestion but could also slow emergency services, potentially putting lives at risk. The strain on public services is equally dire, as there is no spare capacity in our local GP practices and schools. The addition of a large population without a corresponding increase in infrastructure would result in a decline in the quality of these essential services for all residents.   Loss of Property Value The proposed development also poses a direct financial threat to existing homeowners in Frodsham. A key reason people choose to live here is for its access to open countryside and green views. The development on FRO01 and FRO02 would effectively strip away this rural buffer, fundamentally altering the character of the area. A large-scale development that introduces more traffic, noise, and light pollution will diminish the very features that give homes in this area their worth. The developers will profit from building on this land, but existing residents will be left to face lower resale values and a loss of the peaceful environment they were sold on.   Air Quality and Light Pollution Frodsham is already within an Air Quality Management Area due to existing high levels of pollutants. The addition of hundreds of new cars will inevitably worsen air pollution, posing a direct risk to the health of all residents. Furthermore, the introduction of widespread lighting from new houses and streets will cause significant light pollution. This is not just a nuisance; it is a serious ecological threat that disrupts the natural behaviour of nocturnal wildlife, particularly bats and moths, both of which are present in Hob Hey Wood.   Antisocial Behaviour and Lack of Community Cohesion The proposed development fails to meet the fundamental requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which states that new growth should support community cohesion. By isolating new homes on the edge of town without integrated public services or social infrastructure, this proposal risks creating a disconnected community. Such estates can become under-supported and under-policed, leading to social fragmentation and a potential increase in antisocial behaviour. This approach is detrimental to both the new and existing residents and fails to create a unified, thriving community.   Conclusion  For all the reasons outlined above, I believe that the proposed development on Green Belt sites FRO01 and FRO02 is not sustainable, not justified, and not acceptable. My objection is a formal response to consultation questions SS41, SS42, and SS43. I urge you to remove these sites from the Local Plan immediately.

Comment

Representation ID: 8434

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Hugh Benson

I&O_8925
FRO03 is most suitable for development due to a number of factors: It adjoins the A56, the main road running through Frodsham and connecting to the M56 FRO03 is relatively flat, which will encourage walking, cycling and wheeling, also having the advantage of new cycle lanes which were installed very recently FRO03 is relatively centrally placed between Frodsham and Helsby Rail stations and is on the main bus route FRO03 is within walking distance Helsby High school FRO03 is within easy reach of Castle Park, which has excellent play facilities, large green spaces and an Arts Centre, as well as Frodsham marshes. However, any increase in homes, people and cars would not be sustainable in Frodsham due to the other comments in my emailed responses.

Comment

Representation ID: 8444

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Gerrard

I&O_8935
I wish to register my objections, in the strongest possible terms, to the proposal to build homes on protected Green Belt land adjacent to Hob Hey Wood, Frodsham (policies SS41, SS42, SS43). Much of Hob Hey Wood is ancient woodland and forms an important habitat for wildlife, flora and many rare species. It forms an important, irreplaceable oasis of beauty, calm and solitude within our County. I've known and loved the woodland since I was a child and always found it a place of retreat and comfort at any time. I've lived in the area of Bradley Lane, Frodsham all my life and seen much change and development in Frodsham down the years but this, I consider, a step too far. This proposed development would lead to: Damage to Ancient Woodland and harm to the wildlife. Destruction of important wildlife corridors. Loss of green space. More gridlock on Frodsham Roads. Poorer air quality and worsening of light pollution. Strain on local infrastructure including GP's, dentists and schools. Possible increased flood risk. Falling house prices. I sincerely hope that these proposals will be reconsidered.  

Comment

Representation ID: 8450

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Steve King

SS41
I&O_8941
Dear all  As a local resident I wish to object in the strongest possible terms to the above polices and the concept of building many new houses on this essentially Green Belt Land.   This would be completely contrary to the interests of local residents and beggars the question of the local countryside and infrastructure being able to properly enable such a ludicrous level of development in the absence of obvious local  need for it . My primary reasons for the objection are as follows:   Inability of the local infrastructure to support such a development (roads, schools, GP's, dentists etc, surface water drainage and sewage control and management) Loss of a vital part of our local green space and countryside, and likely impacts on wildlife in a protected Green Belt area Damage to the fabric of local community Severe damage to the reputation of the Council and its application of policies to support and protect its council tax paying residents in the face of ludicrous, unwarranted and unsustainable governmental housing targets

Comment

Representation ID: 8469

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Robert Swift

SS41
I&O_8960
I am formally objecting to the policies SS41, SS42, SS43. I am extremely worried about infrastructure of the town. The roads already become gridlocked at peak times. Schools are already incredibly competitive and we have to wait months to get a doctor when we moved here. These houses can not be built without serious investment in the local area for schools, doctors, parks, gyms, and more. Regardless, I'd hate to lose the amazing countryside that border Frodsham because of more houses.

Comment

Representation ID: 8487

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Dorothea Moreland

I&O_8978
I object to the above policies on many grounds. Main ones being extra traffic ( Frodsham is a nightmare when the M56 is closed between J12 and 14 - not a one off occasion ! ) , parking, definitely strain on GP’s, dentists, and destruction around Hob Hey wood.

Comment

Representation ID: 8511

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Dan Thompson

SS41
I&O_9002
Dear Sir / Madam I write to object to the building of land next to Hob Hey or Hobby Wood as I have known it to be called all my life The policy numbers in this case are SS41 SS42 SS43 I write to register my objection to these policies I object because the areas proposed for development are all on areas designated as greenbelt land Greenbelt, this a highly important designation for land as it provides open space, protect natural habitats, prevents urban sprawl. Greenbelt act as natural buffers during wildfires that, in my opinion are going to become more common as the summers become warmer. They help provide essential groundwater during droughts and help off set global climate change as they store carbon dioxide. Greenbelt policies were designed to preserve remaining green areas for the benefit of human and animal life. I object to the development of this greenbelt as the local infrastructure is already under stress, Townfield Lane develops new pot holes regally leading to damage to vehicles and housing foundations. Whenever the M 56 is closed for any reason the local roads become gridlocked sometimes for many hours leading to increased air pollution and this will increase to intolerable levels if this development is granted planning permission If these policies are given permission there will be an increase in local noise levels and air and water pollution, this area has ancient woodland and wildlife which will both be harmed by development in this area. The local GP surgery and chemists struggle to cope with the numbers in the area currently and this will be further impacted. There are many areas such as near land adjacent to Gleeves garden centre more suited to development

Comment

Representation ID: 8527

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs L Williamson

I&O_9018
I am objecting to building on hob hey wood Frodsham. policies ss41,ss42,ss43.

Comment

Representation ID: 8535

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs G Moore

I&O_9026
I write having just been made aware of the Cheshire West and Chester local plan, Draft Spatial Strategy Options – Option B (follow current local plan level and distribution of development). The following, objecting, comments also apply to Option C (sustainable transport corridors). Regarding the potential building of housing adjacent to and bordering Hob Hey Wood in Frodsham - FRO01 & FRO02 , there appear to be multiple reasons for objection that cannot have been given proper consideration when formulating these plans. Green Belt Protection Given the current climate emergency, it is irresponsible to build on green belt land. Green belt land should only be bult on in exceptional circumstances, of which the plans shown would be an egregious misuse of the land and contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework. No clear justification has been provided for why these homes must be built on this specific Green Belt land as opposed to brownfield or infill sites elsewhere and the proposal undermines the very purpose of Green Belt designation: to protect countryside from urban sprawl, preserve character of rural communities and safeguard natural environments Environmental and Ecological Damage With the wood being Frodsham’s remaining ancient woodland it is a cherished, ecologically sensitive ancient woodland with high biodiversity and public value, used as a quiet refuge by many, which will be irrefutably ruined if housing is so close, a considerable blow to the mental and physical health of those who use it. Building so close will have a detrimental effect on the woodland even if the wood itself is not touched; irreversible habitat destruction, edge effects such as the change in water run-off, light, litter, noise and air pollution when built would negatively impact on every aspect of the wood and wildlife therein (including bats). Development would harm visual amenity, remove key wildlife corridors, degrade views for locals and affect walking routes. Additionally, building would violate the national and local biodiversity and Natural England principles on protecting ancient woodland buffer zones. Traffic and Infrastructure Pressure The harm sustained during construction would be unjustifiable. With no existing road infrastructure improvements proposed to cope with the increased volume of vehicles and notwithstanding the inevitable dust and noise issues, there is only one possible access/egress route for construction traffic, Langdale Way, which would cause significant issues. Traffic build-up would be unreasonable, with the Langdale Way/Fluin Lane junction becoming blocked and the Fluin Lane/Main Street junction following suit. Langdale Way is unsuitable for construction traffic and permanent increased flow; the road surface is already full of potholes which would only increase in number and size (the council will already be liable for vehicle damage considering the time the current defects have been there and this would increase). The vibrations from construction traffic would have the ability to damage the foundations of existing housing, creating another liability. Construction traffic would undoubtedly consist of diesel-powered vehicles, many of which would not meet the latest emissions standards regarding particulates and as the Supreme Court has set a precedent that vehicle emissions can be directly linked to health issues, any newly arising issues of such nature could be subject to legal action. If built, how would residents access/egress the Lakes Estate? The problems outlined above would remain and Townfield Lane is unsuitable (both in road surface and space) for any more commuter traffic. There are insufficient jobs within Frodsham, so a large increase in commuter traffic would be unavoidable. Furthermore, Frodsham/Helsby already suffers severe congestion/gridlock, at school run times and especially around the M56 junctions/whenever there is an issue with the M56 (i.e. very frequently), whilst the Weaver swing bridge is unable to cope with the existing level of traffic without requiring frequent repairs, so how could it possibly survive with an increased load? This would all increase air pollution and further exacerbate the problems experienced by emergency vehicles. Stating or expecting that new residents would use the train for transport is naïve at best and there is insufficient station car parking to accommodate them if they do, as the majority would not walk that distance to the station. Lack of Infrastructure Capacity/Overdevelopment How would Frodsham’s current facilities accept such a population increase (potentially up to 50%); the GP practices have already been ejecting patients from their registers who are close/on neighbouring council areas, so where is the capacity to accept new patients? The same is true for no expansion capacity in Frodsham’s dentists, schools, social services and shopping; the development would be unsustainable and therefore contrary to national guidelines. Water run-off/drainage/sewer capacity has previously been a major issue on the Lakes Estate, especially in Langdale way (necessitating the building of underground water tanks) and the areas of FRO01 & FRO02 currently act as a sponge; building over them will likely make the issue return and with no further tank storage space available, where would this excess water and sewage go? Further Comments The land identified in FRO01 includes the Townfield Allotments with over 80 tenants including a special school plot and an adult care support plot. The whole site is registered as an assert of Community Value and includes a memorial orchard and a field hedge planted in 2016 in memory of World War One, therefore it should not be disturbed. Food sufficiency is a major issue for the UK, with the percentage of food imported continuing to grow and further increase the national debt that the government is trying to reduce, all while world politics and climate change continues to make the global food supply more fragile. As a nation, we should be encouraging our farmers to produce food, not building on productive agricultural land particularly land that is of good quality. As a final point, I note that there was not an option of a meeting for residents of Frodsham to attend and comment; why?

Comment

Representation ID: 8549

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Helen Miles

FRO01, FRO02 and FRO03
I&O_9040
I am writing to object to the plans to build houses on the proposed greenbelt areas of Frodsham FRO01, FRO02 and FRO03 (SS41, SS42, SS43). One of the main attractions of people moving to Frodsham is its semi-rural location and the green belt which separates it from the neighbouring communities of Sutton Weaver, Runcorn, Kingsley and Helsby. The proposed developments would completely change the nature of the village and the appeal to anyone wanting to settle there. Additionally it would have an impact on the local wildlife, such as foxes, badgers, birds of prey and bats. As well as removing their habitat, there would be impact of air, noise and light pollution (bearing in mind many of these creatures are nocturnal). In addition, the current dwellings would be bordering the reserve of Hob Hey woods, which would significantly increase the amount of human-wildlife interactions, which do not always end positively. The infrastructure in Frodsham is under pressure now without the added pressure of 2,500 new families. Any new developments would also require an overhaul of the current infrastructure facilities, with new road networks, transport networks, additional school places, health & dentist facilities, recycling centre, banking facilities (only 1 currently opened) and social care facilities. The cost of such development would not be borne by the housing construction companies, but by the local authorities and ultimately the taxpayer. Currently, in Frodsham there is a wide variety and price  of homes available, from Park Homes for the over 55s, to the large houses and bungalows on Fluin Lane. There are houses available to meet everyone's budget, and currently some of these houses are remaining on the market for over 9 months before being sold. This does not point to there being a boom in demand for any new house builds in the vicinity. Therefore, I do not see where there will be a demand for over 2,500 new houses, especially when this has come at the cost of the green belt area which does attract newcomers. If you take the example of nearby Helsby, where a large housing development has already gone bust, and had to be taken over by a rival builder, it does not bode well for any green field development in Frodsham. Frodsham has been very successful in the last few years of re-developing sites which had outgrown their original purpose. Several churches, the Cheshire Cheese Pub, the Old Hall Hotel and the old Library building have all been repurposed to provide additional accommodation in the village without taking away from the appearance of the character of the buildings developed. Frodsham still has many empty buildings which could benefit from such development, as well as the brownfield sites next to the Health Centre, land next to Gleaves Garden Centre or industrial park on Fountains lane. In conclusion I do not think there is the current demand in Frodsham for the scale of housing outlined in the current plans, especially if this is at the detriment to the character of the village and surrounding areas. There are more tailored options available, using current buildings and brownfield sites, which would enhance the nature of the village, and create a limited but more sustainable housing plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 8613

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Roger and Sue Frost

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_9104
Objection to Proposed Development in Frodsham FR001, FR002 A Detailed Case Against Expansion Cheshire West's proposed development plans involve extensive house building in Frodsham, on areas surrounded by protected countryside and Green Belt. This objection details the reasons such development should not proceed, focusing on breaches of planning policy, environmental harm, infrastructure constraints, and the risk of altering the local landscape forever. Green Belt Policy and National Planning Framework The Green Belt around Frodsham is designed to prevent urban sprawl and safeguard natural countryside. Development here is only permitted under ‘exceptional circumstances', which have not been demonstrated in this instance. Local Neighbourhood Strategy and Sustainability Frodsham's Neighbourhood Plan-created and approved with local involvement-shows that the town's housing needs can be met without building on the Green Belt. The plan underscores the importance of preserving open fields and green corridors. Wildlife, Ecology, and Landscape Impact The proposed development would break up habitats, threaten protected species, and violate legal. obligations to maintain biodiversity. Frodsham is close to critical ecological sites, and the LocaI Plan Part Two outlines stringent protections for these areas. Infrastructure and Overload Risk LocaI infrastructure-roads, schools, and GP practices-is already under strain. Additional homes would increase the pressure, and currently, there is no confirmed plan to improve or expand these services. Transport and Settlement Identity Although Frodsham has a train station, transport links are limited and no upgrades are planned to accommodate large population growth. Historic Character and Community Value The proposed expansion would undermine the historic and community character of Frodsham, cherished for its market town atmosphere, local green spaces, and scenic views. Final Statement : The Green Belt serves a crucial purpose. These development proposals are contrary to policy, unnecessary and pose a risk to the long-term quality of life in Frodshasm.         Key Objections to Development near and around Hob Hey Wood (FR001 and FR002) Objection : Development on FR001 and FR002 is strongly opposed due to increased flood risk, heavier road traffic, pressure on local services, fragmentation of wildlife routes, and violation of national policy. Traffic lssues : The A56 and other main roads through Frodsham are already congested, and further development would worsen the problem, even affecting emergency response times. Townfield Lane is already heavily blocked by residents parking, creating only single lane passage, restricting access and limiting the ability of emergency vehicles to pass safety through. This area cannot manage any further traffic increases. lmpact on Ancient Woodland : Hob Hey Wood, an ancient woodland and recorded as a Site of Biological Interest in 1992, would suffer greatly. Home to thousands of species, the wood provides both ecological and mental health benefits. For over 100 years there have been significant badger setts within the wood, nesting owls, and areas covered by native English bluebells. Ancient woodland cover is now only 2.4% in Britain; a fraction of what it once was. Frodsham's ancient woodland is now owned by Frodsham Town Council, protected as a Field in Trust, and looked after by Hob Hey Wood Friends Group, which was to ensure that it remains, an extremely important asset for the people of Frodsham to enjoy for many years to come. Destruction of Wildlife Corridors : The planned development would remove essential wildlife corridors connected to Hob Hey Wood, which are vital for local biodiversity. Disturbance to Woodland : Housing built close to the woodland would disturb habitats and wildlife, with domestic pets posing further risks. Flood Risk : The development would increase the chance of surface water flooding, a problem already noted in the area. The council’s own Flood Risk Assessment advises against removing natural barriers. lnfrastructure Strain : Local GPs and schools are full, and the new development would stretch them further-without any clear plans for new public services. Air Quality and Light Pollution : More development would mean poorer air quality and more light pollution, harming both wildlife and people. Antisocial Behaviour and Isolation : Estates built without proper integration risk social fragmentation and increased antisocial behaviour. House Prices : Removing the natural features that give existing homes their value is likely to reduce property Prices. Green Belt lmportance : The Green Belt should remain intact-there are alternatives available. Breaching it here sets a dangerous precedent.

Comment

Representation ID: 8628

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Pamela Foster

FR001 and FR002
I&O_9119
Of the three areas identified, FRO01 and FRO02 are completely unsuitable and completely unacceptable. Suggesting FRO01 and FRO02 for development is a dreadful idea. It will destroy wildlife, increase flood risk and adds further strain to infrastructure already under pressure. Air quality will worsen, and it will lower property values. All it does is benefit developers whilst damaging communities. It is a completely unjustified, unsustainable and unacceptable proposal.  FRO03 is probably a little more suited of the identified areas, of course assuming that the extra pressure on local services and infrastructure is accommodated? Will traffic be able to access without an increase in congestion? Will public services such as GPs be increased to accommodate the increase in population? Have any other areas been considered such as brownfield sites, or possibly even the land to the south of Lady Heyes - to the right of the B5152 when heading away from Frodsham. Although it is about two miles from Frodsham Train Station, using the iTravel bus this journey could be completed in just a few minutes allowing residents to use the train if they wish to do so.