Comment

Representation ID: 9898

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Angela Benson

I&O_10395
Option A- retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9899

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Katy Hanson

I&O_10396
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9900

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Scott Halliday

I&O_10397
I wish to make my representation on  Question SS 11 . My clear preference is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt. I strongly believe the Green Belt should remain protected. It provides vital environmental, recreational, and community benefits, and its preservation is essential for maintaining the character and sustainability of our local area.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9910

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Paul Jennings

I&O_10407
I believe that Cheshire West and Chester should retain the green belt boundary (Option A).

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9918

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Lyndsey Dodd

I&O_10415
Option A. You have already stated that all options are capable of supporting 29,000 new homes across CWAC, so it makes sense to retain all green belt land wherever possible.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9926

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Philip Brooking

I&O_10423
Please add my response to the latest local plan consultation Question SS11. My response to Question SS11 is option B

Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 9930

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Fiona McDonald

SS11
I&O_10427
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9931

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Emma Fletcher

I&O_10428
I support OPTION A Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9974

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes Ltd (North West)

Agent: Savills (UK) Limited

I&O_10471
The most appropriate spatial strategies for CW&C are Options B and C above. For the reasons outlined above, namely, to ensure the Plan is ambitious and plans to deliver sufficient housing, Option A should be discounted, as retaining the current Green Belt extent would restrict realistic opportunities to deliver sustainable development in appropriate locations in the District. In order to deliver at least 1,928 new homes per year, the Council will need to assess land that is currently within the Green Belt for its potential to deliver sustainable residential development. While Savills recognises the prioritisation of previously developed land for housing development, there is not a sufficient supply of available previously developed land in urban areas that is capable of accommodating the housing requirement within the Plan period.

Comment

Representation ID: 9976

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mike Worthington

SS11
I&O_10473
Hi All, Are you aware of the plans to build loads of houses on green belt land in Parkgate and Neston? Locals are being asked to email the council and vote against the proposed plans. The email has to be received by this Friday, 29th August. I’ve just sent an email to the council. I have done a template for anyone else who would like to send one; which I’m sharing below: You need to put your name and address at the top and email to: planningpolicy@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk   Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt* Yours faithfully,

Comment

Representation ID: 9988

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Hayley Andrews

SS11
I&O_10485
In answer to question SS 11, I would like choose Option A-  Retaining Green Belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Support

Representation ID: 10007

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Warrington Borough Council

I&O_10504
Thank you providing the opportunity for Warrington Borough Council to comment on Cheshire West and Chester’s Local Plan Regulation 18 consultation. Having reviewed the consultation material, we support your ‘suggested policy approach’ to plan to meet your development needs, including the need for new homes and employment land, in full within your administrative boundary. Warrington Borough Council is committed to working with Cheshire West and Chester Council under the Duty to Cooperate as you progress the preparation of your Local Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 10011

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Miss Helen Makin

I&O_10508
Why is option A retain the greenbelt marled n/a? It's not an option so we just go ahead and build all over it? I want this option and I do not want options B, The other thing I will say is that there are a huge number of complex papers attached to this, masses of questions and the Council expects ordinary residents a) to have the time to read through thousands of pages and b) respond to dozens and dozens of questions which can only be done by signing into a portal. Clearly the Council tried to make this as difficult as possible.  The bottom line is this, stop building on greenbelt and greenfield sites, prioritise brownfield sites, stop allowing developers to build on unsuitable land eg flood risk areas because they don't address the issues properly and it causes mayhem for residents and the developers don't care as long as they make a profit. Not to mention the disruption and noise and intrusion for residents again which no one cares about.
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 10028

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Horizon Cremation (Hooton) Ltd

Agent: AshtonHale

I&O_10525
It is Horizon’s view that Option C is the most appropriate spatial strategy for Cheshire West and Chester, as it allows for the delivery of development within strategic and accessible locations across the borough. Concentrating growth in these areas ensures new development is well connected to employment, education, and services, while reducing reliance on private cars and encouraging more sustainable patterns of movement. Horizon support the approach outlined in Option C which is proactive in recognising the need for sites being released from the Green Belt to deliver development in sustainable locations. In the case of Hooton, Horizon support the acknowledgement that there is an opportunity for an enhanced role of land around the train station and for development to be appropriate to the scale and function of the settlement.

Comment

Representation ID: 10045

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: C Williams

SS11
I&O_10542
My answer is OPTION A - RETAIN THE GREENBELT" there has been a huge decline in wildlife around where I am. The whole stretch from us to the main road is currently being threatened which would take everyone living here from having green space and fields we use for dog walking to being basically in the middle of an extended housing estate, and pretty much cut off the donkey sanctuary and local horse livery from the countryside.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10046

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Reverend G H Buchan

SS11
I&O_10543
I strongly prefer Option A to Question SS1 which is to preserve the existing green belt area. I am a resident in Anderton. The infrastructure of the area is already grossly overloaded, particularly with regard to access to medical facilities. Existing traffic levels can not sustain further increases.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10050

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Wood

SS11
I&O_10547
In response to question SS11. My choice is Option A retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10051

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Karen Spruce

SS11
I&O_10548
In response to the planning in Cheshire West and Chester / Sandiway / Cuddington area and in answer to Question SS 11 - Option A – PLEASE retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10052

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Ms Nicola Park

I&O_10549
I believe there is a proposal to build on the green belt  in Northwich . In regards to question SS 11 , i strongly prefer option A which is to preserve the existing green belt area .  Wildlife is under great pressure in this area . We have protect species such as newts and bats , badgers and hedgehogs residing in these fields , hedgerows and trees . We have large populations of wild bees in our area providing vital pollination Also all wild birds are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, including their nests and eggs.  Winnington estate and the new solar farm are all ready challenging the roads infrastructure. Particularly Winnington Bridge . There are a distinct lack of schools , dentists and doctors in the area to cope with an ever increasing population. There will be noise , traffic and environmental pollution created from the building site and the increased numbers of homes .  Please don’t allow are Greenbelts to be destroyed- we need them for our future , our food and our oxygen. 
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

Comment

Representation ID: 10053

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Colin Benson

SS11
I&O_10550
Answer to QuestionSS11 is Option A

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10082

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: R E, S, E and T Smith, Taylor, Cox and Carter

Agent: Savills (UK) Limited

I&O_10579
The Local Plan (Part One) was adopted in January 2015, which is more than 10 years ago. Since that time, national policy in relation to Green Belt has changed substantially. The most recent version of the NPPF requires local authorities to make plans to meet their local housing need (standard method figure) in full. This requirement stems from the Government’s commitment to significantly bolster the delivery of homes and speed up planning in order to deliver 1.5 million new homes over the next Parliament. In order to deliver at least 1,928 new homes per year, the Council will need to assess land that is currently within the Green Belt for its potential to deliver sustainable residential development. In doing so, the Council should first consider the most sustainable locations that are adjacent to existing facilities, services and transport options. While Savills recognises the prioritisation of previously developed land for housing development, there is not a sufficient supply of available previously developed land in urban areas that is capable of accommodating the housing requirement within the Plan period.

Comment

Representation ID: 10094

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Margaret Degville

I&O_10591
i strongly prefer option a to keep the green belt area.i oppose building on the land anderton barnton as the roads bridge are not suitable now and could not cope with more houses as these and on the tata site.also with the approved solar panel scheme more traffic will be on the roads.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10098

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Nia Bradley

I&O_10595


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10099

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Mike Wheeler

I&O_10596
I would like to remind you that the planet is already suffering enough and that it is critical that we all make choices that do not make it even worse. We have fitted solar panels and an air source heat pump, so that we are now carbon free in heating/lighting our household. You have the power NOT to ruin the greenbelt; I hope you do this.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10100

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Alan McLellan

SS11
I&O_10597
I answering Question SS 11 and my choice is Option A - Retain the green belt Supporting reasons Chester’s road infrastructure will not support the extra housing that is proposed. The currently being built school on Kings Moat will not have the capacity to accommodate the additional future proposed  housing. There will be additional pressure on existing medical facilities which are greatly overstretched at the moment. Sent from my iPad 4

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10101

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Debra van Berkel

SS11
I&O_10598
Good afternoon  My name is XXX I'm emailing to object to the building of more houses on green belt land in and around Northwich. And would like to voice my opinion for Option A question SS11 as this has the least impact on our very precious green belt.  Barnton Weaverham do not have the facilities to cope with even more new builds after the Winnington estate was built with no infrastructure, getting into the doctors dentist has been a nightmare on top of not enough schools in the area to support another influx of people. The bridge going into Winnington from Barnton and visversa was not designed for all this extra traffic and the large vehicles traveling through.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10102

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Stephen Boyd

I&O_10599
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10104

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Angela and Patrick Klabou

SS11
I&O_10601
Dear Sir/Madam We are writing to express our very strong opposition to the proposed large scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. We are answering Question SS11 and our choice is:  Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10118

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Clair Lindon

SS11
I&O_10615
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt* Yours faithfully,

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Support

Representation ID: 10119

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Geoffrey Thomson and Over Estates (Winsford) Ltd

Agent: Savills (UK) Limited

I&O_10616
The Site could come forward under any of Options A, B or C above. The Site is not located within the Green Belt and is in a sustainable location nearby to facilities in the existing settlement and local transport options. Notwithstanding that the Site could come forward under Option A, it is considered that the Council will still need to consider sites that are currently within the Green Belt in order to ensure sufficient land can come forward to meet the local housing requirement. Therefore, Options B and C are considered to be most appropriate to plan for a sustainable pattern of development in the District.