Comment

Representation ID: 8843

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Sue Ross

I&O_9336
SS 11, my choice is: Option A - Retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8846

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Raya Georgieva

SS11
I&O_9339
Question SS 11 and my choice is: � Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8848

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: James Chilton

I&O_9341
Option B, follow current local plan level and distribution of development 

Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 8858

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Jonathon Smedley

NOR01
I&O_9351
My name is XXX (tel XXX), I am a resident of Barnton.  I oppose building on greenfield sites, especially on NOR01 as these backroads are a popular place for locals to walk and are part of the character of the local community. This area is also very accessible to people with limited mobility (eg.wheelchair users) who may not be able to otherwise access green spaces.  It is also an accessible walk for people who may not drive, and I also know that many people use this space for cycling due to the scenery, good road, and lack of traffic. I strongly feel that building here will negatively affect the local community.  My answer to question SS11 is A - retain the greenbelt.  I am also very disappointed in the lack of publicity this proposal has had and feel that most residents are unaware of this. Especially when considering how much this will impact the community.   I would be more than happy to answer any more questions or engage further

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8866

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Michael Northeast

Northwich
I&O_9359
To whom it may concern, I am contacting you regarding the consultancy to build more homes in Northwich.  In regards to question SS11 I choose Option A - to retain the green belt.  Our green spaces and wildlife are of great importance to me and it should be to everyone. There are plenty of undeveloped sites in Northwich town centre so I suggest you focus your plans there. My contact details are, should you wish to discuss this further, are:

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8877

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Maciej Labiak

SS11
I&O_9370
Question SS11 I support Option A – Retain the Green Belt, as this is the only option that protects our countryside, local green spaces, and ensures sustainable long-term planning.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8894

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Laura Jane Rowlands

SS11
I&O_9387
Good morning My name is Laura Rowlands. I am emailing you regarding questions SS 11 and would like to express that my choice would be to retain the green belt.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8904

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Susanne McLoughlin

SS11
I&O_9397
Please include my vote option in your recent survey  Option A Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8909

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Michael McNamee

I&O_9402
Re Question  SS 11 My choice is: OPTION A: Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8920

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Craig thomson

SS11
I&O_9413
To whom it may regard I’m writing to express concerns for any increase in new homes in and around the Barnton area. The Barnton swing bridge is already struggling with the increase traffic from the Winnington developments especially since the local council seemingly made the mistake of not insisting that improvements were made to the bridge as part of the developments. On top of that there seems to be no additional public facilities being mentioned to help with the extra numbers on schools, doctors, dentists etc For one particular question- SS11 I strongly support option A

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 8921

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Sian Westby

I&O_9414
With regard to the consultation and in answer to question SS 11, my choice is: Option B - Follow local current plan level and distribution of development.
Neither of these
Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 8922

Received: 05/09/2025

Respondent: Carina Homer

SS11
I&O_9415
To the planning policy team,  As a resident of Chester I would like to offer my response to the consultation question SS11 and my choice is option a- protect the green belt. Kind regards 

Comment

Representation ID: 8923

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Mrs J Jenkins

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9416
Re: Hinderton Road, Chester 1.16 - We consider only a variation of OPTION B will deliver the most meaningful, logical and sustainable growth and delivery strategy for the Borough; the reasons of this will be presented in our answers that follow and we set out our alternative OPTION D below. 1.17 However, there is a recognition that rural communities must also provide an “uptick” and deliver infrastructure. There are over 6,000 on the housing waiting list and an increasing number reliant upon being housed in temporary accommodation. These households cannot wait for a Local Plan to deliver aspirational housing number solutions, they need housing solutions now. There is a need to address this acute and critical housing needs across the open market and affordable housing sectors along with delivery of essential infrastructure and attracting investment to deliver economic growth and jobs. 1.18 The opportunity therefore exists for the Local Plan Review to take a more progressive, balanced and proportionate approach to sustainable growth - one that offers to recalibrate and deliver greater relative sustainability to not just the Major or Key Service Centre settlements but also the Local Service Centres too. 1.19 However, the emerging plan will need to follow the direction set out in NPPF and adhere to the “Duty to Co-operate” and part of this will be the need to recognise that there has effectively been a complete collapse of housing delivery in the adjacent districts of Wrexham, Wirral and Shropshire over the past 20 years. 1.20 This submission urges a need for co-operation and there now being consideration of CWACC taking up the slack in delivering extra growth. It has proven that it is capable of delivery over the past/current 2010 to 2030 plan period and the level of delivery achieved indicates that it has capacity for additional growth. [See attachment para 1.21-1.23 tables and suggestion for Option D on housing growth and spatial distribution.] 1.24 This largely adopts the revised settlement hierarchy that is presented under SS4 but presents them in logical groupings and the only fundamental change is that Christleton moves up a tier – it benefits from a host of support services including Primary and Secondary schools and for this reason alone must be considered much more than just a Local Service Centre. 1.25 We consider that these amendments would allow the emerging plan to be found “sound” and we would welcome the opportunity to discuss these with Officers. [See NPPF context attached para 2.1]

Comment

Representation ID: 8936

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah Walker-Swift

I&O_9429
With regard to the consultation and in answer to question SS 11, my choice is: Option B - Follow local current plan level and distribution of development.
Neither of these
Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 8948

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Mrs J Jenkins

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9441
Variation of Option B is preferred – see our Option D below [attached]

Comment

Representation ID: 8976

Received: 08/09/2025

Respondent: Mr John Andrews

SS11
I&O_9469
Please accept my response to Question SS 11 and that my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9001

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Jane Clayton

I&O_9494
I would like to answer question SS 11: option A: retain the Green Belt. We can’t let this go. Wildlife needs it and human beings need it. We need access to nature. Don’t destroy this protection.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9016

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Winsford Town Council

I&O_9509
In examining these options, Winsford Town Council has referred to the attached Appendix 1 (Draft Spatial Strategy Options). These show the following: - That Option A would mean over 10,000 additional homes in Winsford Options B and C would mean an additional 3-5,000 homes in Winsford The distribution of new housing in the Winsford area Having examined these options, Winsford Town Council wishes to support Option C for the following reasons: - The options reflect discussions at Town Council meetings and also discussions involving members of the public Option C delivers the ambitions set out in the Local Plan in a strategic sense Housing is distributed more fairly throughout the borough as a whole The options builds on existing networks and facilities In coming to the conclusion outlined above, Winsford Town Council has taken into account the points set out in the Local Plan documents issued to date and has also taken soundings of public opinion. The Town Council has also noted CWAC’s comment that under all of the options, it may be necessary to identify new areas or broad locations for development if not enough land can be identified within settlements, and that these areas may be located in the Green Belt and/or countryside. In addition, Winsford Town Council has noted that land has been excluded where there are constraints that would act as potential ‘showstoppers’ to restrict future development for example designated habitats sites, areas of flood risk and significant hazard zones. Finally, Winsford Town Council notes that that approximately 100 areas have been identified for potential growth and/or future allocation in the new Local Plan.

Option C - Sustainable transport corridors

Comment

Representation ID: 9020

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Janet Smith

I&O_9513
Option A- Retain the Greenbelt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9021

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Helen Hughes

I&O_9514
We are replying in answer to the green belt building in our area and responding accordingly by answering to SS 11.  Our reply is: A - DO NOT BUILD ON OUR AREA'S GREEN BELT.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9025

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Andy Muir

I&O_9518
I am answering question SS11 regarding planning on green belt. My choice is Option A - Retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9052

Received: 25/08/2025

Respondent: Hayley Roberts

CH01
I&O_9545


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9068

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Freya Brocklebank

I&O_9561
I’m writing in relation to question SS 11, and I choose option A to retain the green belt. There are many sites in CWAC that require regeneration before building new houses and many of us have paid higher prices to live in/around areas near greenbelt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9069

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Beverly Toolan

I&O_9562
I am answering question SS11 and my choice is Option A to retain the Green Belt. I believe housing developments need to focus first on brownfield sites and also more thought is needed into infrastructure to support new residents ( doctors, public transport, schools etc) and to balance retaining green spaces.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9070

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Karen Bundred

I&O_9563
My choice is option A RETAIN THE GREEN BELT

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9077

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Deborah Kamber

I&O_9570
One of the things I love about living in this area is the marsh, the woods & the surrounding fields! Have lived locally for 33 years,  I am lucky enough to live in Little Neston down by the marsh, lovely area with amazing views over to North Wales …   We, Nestoners, LOVE where we live & DEFINITELY do NOT want further house building on our green belt - I am referring to the the plans for the Leighton Rd area!!   DO NOT WRECK OUR GREEN BELT!!! I look forward to hearing positive news,

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 9080

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Matthew Beard

I&O_9573
In reference to the local village plan, specifically question SS 11 my preferred option would be: Option A - Retain the Greenbelt  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Support

Representation ID: 9119

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Alvanley Parish Council

I&O_9612
We would support Option B as the most appropriate strategy as this would appear to offer the most balanced approach to future development across the borough (i.e. development is spread more evenly across the key settlements).

Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 9123

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Miller Developments

Agent: NJL Consulting

I&O_9616
The detail of each option is discussed in more detail below, under option specific questions, however at present, we support none of the presented options in their current form. (See attachment for all responses) Miller Developments believe that subject to the detailed amends, Option B is the best option, however, the sustainable principle of option C is supported and would be the next preferred option.

Comment

Representation ID: 9172

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Louise Shawcross

I&O_9665
Option C Sustainable transport routes

Option C - Sustainable transport corridors