Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Search representations

Results for Vistry Group and J Whittingham search

New search New search

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 78

Representation ID: 9715

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10211
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 81

Representation ID: 9716

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10212
Largely unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station, school and pub but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance. We do, however, see some merit in LOS2 and 3 but they do have access issues to contend with.


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 84

Representation ID: 9717

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10213
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station and a pub, but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question CH 1

Representation ID: 9718

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10214
Yes, but it could be enhanced - Chester should be identified as the principle “driver for growth” in the Borough. Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough.


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question CH 2

Representation ID: 9719

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10215
No


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question CH 3

Representation ID: 9720

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10216
No


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question CH 5

Representation ID: 9721

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10217
Yes


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question CH 6

Representation ID: 9722

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10218
Yes


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question CH 7

Representation ID: 9723

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10219
Yes


Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question CH 8

Representation ID: 9724

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

Agent: J10 Planning

Representation Summary:

I&O_10220
Maybe, subject to what is proposed


For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.