Comment

Representation ID: 169

Received: 14/07/2025

Respondent: Mike Mather

I&O_191
No, I've not read it but sounds like nanny statism. People are responsible for what they eat noone else.

Comment

Representation ID: 1324

Received: 02/08/2025

Respondent: Dr & Mrs JF & GM Higgs

I&O_1429
Drive through outlets should not be permitted as they generate rubbish along the road sides and idling engines generate harmful emissions, also the queueing can cause traffic congestion

Comment

Representation ID: 1644

Received: 12/08/2025

Respondent: Roberta Pomponio

I&O_1754
Yes – the 2023 guidance elements worth including are: Exclusion zones (800–1000m) around schools, playgrounds, and leisure centres. Caps on clustering of takeaways within local centres. Requirement for active frontages and mixed use in commercial areas to avoid “dead zones.” Embedding these in policy would give them more weight than a standalone SPD.

Comment

Representation ID: 3760

Received: 23/08/2025

Respondent: Deryn O'Connor

I&O_3942
N/A

Comment

Representation ID: 6610

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Councillor Lucy Sumner

I&O_7030
21 | HW5   Should Hot Food Takeaways guidance (2023) be added?   🐝 Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan Evidence Base   FNHP seeks to support independent retail and healthy food choices, limiting unhealthy clustering.   🌳 Ancient Woodland Hob Hey Wood   Access to nature is linked to mental and physical health; woodland and corridors should be factored into policy as part of green amenity provision.   🌹 Labour Perspective   Labour nationally backs action on childhood obesity and food deserts. Sheffield’s Labour-led council has banned unhealthy food advertising on council property.   🧠 Wider Context   Research (TRUUD 2023, LSHTM 2019) shows fast food near schools drives obesity and worsens inequalities.   📌 Important Considerations Enforce 400m exclusion around schools, except in town centres. Restrict clustering of takeaways to protect retail diversity. Support healthy food outlets and community cafes as alternatives.

Comment

Representation ID: 6853

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Philip Marshall

I&O_7289
Yes - policies should restrict hot food takeaways within 400m of schools, prevent over-concentration in centres, and require consideration of litter, noise, and health impacts. This would help address obesity, anti-social behaviour, and environmental quality concerns.

Comment

Representation ID: 11009

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11507
No, keep it out of the policy.

Comment

Representation ID: 11382

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11880
Don't know 

Comment

Representation ID: 11700

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: CPRE Cheshire Branch

I&O_12198
No comment.

Comment

Representation ID: 14311

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Judith Critchley

I&O_14855
Dont know 

Comment

Representation ID: 15661

Received: 21/10/2025

Respondent: Wirral Borough Council

I&O_16220
No comments at this stage.

Comment

Representation ID: 16402

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Active Cheshire

I&O_16983
Yes, we support the inclusion of relevant elements of the Hot Food Takeaways Guidance in the Local Plan. We particularly recommend: Restricting new hot food takeaways within 400m proximity to education settings, to help shape healthier environments for children and young people. Considering the cumulative impact of multiple takeaways on local health outcomes, particularly in areas with higher obesity prevalence and/or deprivation. Broadening the guidance note to include leisure centres, sports facilities, and other community settings where healthier environments can support increased opportunities for activity and wellbeing.