Comment

Representation ID: 12518

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah and Andy Smith

I&O_13035
I support  Option A – Retain the Green Belt . This is the only option that protects communities, prevents urban sprawl, and supports the regeneration of existing urban areas.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12522

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Martin Pulford

I&O_13039
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12523

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Lynda Hodson

I&O_13040
My choice is option A Please retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12525

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Joe Taberner

I&O_13042
I support  Option A – Retain the Green Belt . This is the only option that protects communities, prevents urban sprawl, and supports the regeneration of existing urban areas.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12530

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Amanda Taberner

I&O_13047
I support  Option A – Retain the Green Belt . This is the only option that protects communities, prevents urban sprawl, and supports the regeneration of existing urban areas.

Comment

Representation ID: 12534

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Clare McPartlin

NOR10, NOR11, NOR12
I&O_13051
With regards to the proposed housing areas surrounding Weaverham village. (NOR10, NOR11, NOR12) In answer to question SS 11, I would like to choose Option A- Retaining Green Belt.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12535

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Dawn Citrine

I&O_13052
Option A - protect the greenbelt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12536

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Marilyn Farrington

I&O_13053
May I cast my 'vote' in favour of Option A - Retain our Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12540

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Charlotte Thorning

I&O_13057
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposal for the development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: OPTION A - RETAIN THE GREENBELT.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12541

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Will Huckle

I&O_13058
I am voting for Option A on Question SS 11

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12542

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Elizabeth Prescott

I&O_13059
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A - Retain the Green Belt My family farm lots of this land and they are important to the Neston community.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12544

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jeff Horn

I&O_13061
I support Option A – Retain the Green Belt. This is the only option that protects communities, prevents urban sprawl, and supports the regeneration of existing urban areas.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12548

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Carol Atkinson

I&O_13065
I read with dismay the proposals relating to the proposed  development of greenbelt land in and around Neston and Parkgate and am contacting you to strongly object to such a large scale development.  I have significant concerns that the local infrastructure is simply not geared up to serve such a significant increase in residential homes. I am answering question “SS 11”  and my choice is: Option A:  Retain the Greenbelt 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12549

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Eileen Scanlan

SS 11
I&O_13066
My choice is option C.

Option C - Sustainable transport corridors

Comment

Representation ID: 12550

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Sarah Farrell

FRO01 and FRO02
I&O_13067
Objection to Local Plan – Sites FRO01 and FRO02 I’m writing to object to plans to build any number of houses on green belt land in Frodsham. The relevant questions I’m answering in this email are as follows: Please select the option which is the most appropriate spatial strategy for Cheshire West and Chester: Option A - Retain the Green Belt Option A is the only one that safeguards the Green Belt and our countryside.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12552

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Catherine Porter-Cernik

SS 11
I&O_13069
I live in Delamere Park in Cuddington.  I attended a meeting last night led by Gillian Edwards who explained some of the proposed options.  I think that out of the three options proposed option A seemed like the best option. I am concerned that any other option would put the current infrastructure under great strain and would be massively opposed by farmers and local people.  In addition to this our green spaces are important spots for wildlife, particularly in our area of Delamere Park where we regularly get hedgehogs. Unfortunately hedgehogs are currently in decline nationally due to habitat loss and busier roads. I think option A would be a good happy medium providing houses for those that need them without putting too much strain on current services available.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12558

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Robert Holt

SS 11
I&O_13075
My choice is to retain the green belt land. 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12559

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Alice Axon

I&O_13076
I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12560

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Kate Hodson

SS 11
I&O_13077
My answer is Option A retain the green Belt 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12562

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Joanna Green

I&O_13079
With regards the current consultation on the future of the Green Belt ... My choice is Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12563

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jill Lowman

SS 11
I&O_13080
I support  Option A – Retain the Green Belt . This is the only option that protects communities, prevents urban sprawl, and supports the regeneration of existing urban areas. I strongly object to the proposed allocation of Green Belt land for housing development. The Council should reject such proposals and instead pursue sustainable growth through brownfield regeneration and urban capacity studies, fully in line with the NPPF and the principles of Option A.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12570

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ashley Clark

I&O_13087


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12571

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Scanlan

I&O_13088
in my previous email regarding question SS11, I made an error when I put that I chose option A. On further analysis, I I wish to rescind that choice, and let you know that my preferred option is OPTION C. Please take this into consideration.

Option C - Sustainable transport corridors

Comment

Representation ID: 12572

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: John McLannahan

I&O_13089
I want to make it quite clear that I want to protect the Green Belt in this area and I do not want to see more houses built on our countryside.  I am therefore supporting  OPTION A to RETAIN THE GREEN BELT.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12574

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Kelly Hannon

I&O_13091
I am responding to Question SS 11 and choose Option B!!

Option B - Follow current Local Plan level and distribution of development

Comment

Representation ID: 12577

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Steven Pinder

I&O_13094
TO question SS11 , my answer is Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12581

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Ronald Jones

I&O_13098
I would like to select Option A - Retain the Green Belt I do not agree with Option B I do not agree with Option C

Comment

Representation ID: 12585

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Chris Briggs

SS 11
I&O_13102
I would like to respond to recent proposals revealing plans to build hundreds of houses on green belt land.  This is in direct response to question SS 11 submitting my answer as option A - retain the green belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12587

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Gemma Otway

I&O_13104
SS 5 Spatial Strategy Options, Question SS13, I’m Voting for Local plan A

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 12588

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Carolyn Stanton

I&O_13105
I’m writing as a resident of Frodsham in response to your consultation.  My response to your question SS 11 is Option A - Retain the Green Belt