Comment

Representation ID: 10816

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Maria Wood

SS11
I&O_11314
Hi My name is XX, of XXX, Weaverham, Cheshire, XXX. XXX In response to Question SS 11, I choose option A. Retain the Green Belt. Regards  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10817

Received: 27/08/2025

Respondent: Deryn Waring

SS11
I&O_11315
In response to SS 11 our choice is; Option A - retain the green belt  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10818

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Debbie McMaster

I&O_11316


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10819

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jayne Peters

SS11
I&O_11317
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A - Retain the Green Belt* Yours faithfully, 

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10820

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Karen McFarland

SS11
I&O_11318
Dear Sir/Madam, As a resident of Neston, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*   To build such a vast number of houses adjacent to an internationally important SSSI, namely the Dee Estuary would be disastrous for the birds & wildlife that rely upon this habitat.  Yours faithfully,

Comment

Representation ID: 10821

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Kelly

I&O_11319
I would prefer Option A – Retain the Green Belt , as it prioritises brownfield land and avoids unnecessary loss of valuable Green Belt. This is the most sustainable and responsible option given the environmental and infrastructure constraints in Cheshire West.
Neither of these
Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10823

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Ian Waugh

SS11
I&O_11321
This is a hugely over-complicated document you have produced, it's almost as if you don't want people to be able to read and respond to it! But just to be clear, I am answering question SS 11 and my chosen option is A – RETAIN THE GREEN BELT.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10825

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sally Bebbington

SS11
I&O_11323
I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10826

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Matthew Billinge

I&O_11324
I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10827

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Phillippa Day

SS11
I&O_11325
  My response is Option A – Retain the Green Belt My reasons for this is that the green spaces were a key factor in choosing this area to live in. Also my concern is that the sewer system is not capable of supporting this proposal. As a resident in this area our drains are blocked approximately every 6 months. We are fed up of the additional costs incurred. Further properties will exacerbate this problem.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10830

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Pauline Lander

I&O_11328
I am writing in response to your consultation about where new houses should be built in the borough and I would like to state that my response to question SS 11 is Option A - Retain the Green Belt. There are still a great number of brown sites areas in the borough which would benefit from being developed rather than encroaching into the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10831

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Graham O'Sullivan

I&O_11329


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10832

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Jon-Paul Stanford

SS11
I&O_11330
I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is:   Option A – Retain the Green Belt Reasons I am currently abroad and have only just become aware of these planning changes CUD01-CUD05. As such, I will keep this short. We moved to Cuddington as it is a charming country village, surrounded by countryside. The proposed changes will change where we live to being in the middle of several housing estates - essentially encircling us. The proposed changes will ruin the area for the local people who chose to live here. Furthermore there simply isn’t the infrastructure to support so many more households - neither schools, drs, roads/traffic or other essential services.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10833

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Pierangelo Rolle

I&O_11331
My option is A to retain the green belt !

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10838

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Josh Carew

I&O_11336


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10839

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Steve McConnell

I&O_11337
Based upon sight of the consultation map, proposing a number new houses to Cuddington area and east of Delamere Park my vote and objection would be as follows:   My preferred option is Option A - to retain the area as is, promote the green belt land for agricultural and natural use. Ultimately we have to have a self sufficient food source in the UK.   If building is absolutely essential under national plans then I would elect Option B - limiting the builds to 500 houses and in line with the old local and neighbourhood development plans.   Option C is NOT acceptable as there is no real transport corridor in this area. Only a weekly bus service on Delamere Park, trains are only 1 per hour from Cuddington station, A and B roads are of poor quality currently. Adding more traffic would create more problems.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10840

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Lynda Rickels

SS11
I&O_11338
My choice to question SS 11  is - Option A to retain green belt.  

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10841

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Davina Crawford-Young

I&O_11339
My choice is Option A - retain the greenbelt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10844

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Judith Yates

I&O_11342
My choice is: Option A  Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10847

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kath Adshead

I&O_11345
I am answering Question SS 11and my choice is : Option A - Retain the Green Belt.   I could reiterate the objections which will have already been put forward to you regarding infrastructure, loss of agricultural land, increased flood risk etc etc but I know that you will have already received numerous emails concerning these. The bottom line is that retention of green belt in Acton Bridge is paramount to retaining its village status otherwise the area will become yet another urban sprawl.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10851

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Alasdair Dobbing

I&O_11349
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering *Question SS 11* and my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt*

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10852

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr. Ian Slater

I&O_11350
I shall attempt to go through the consultation survey and it's supporting documents but, in case that doesn't work, I wish to state that, with the council's poor track record of ensuring that developers deliver on their promise of intelligent and adequate infrastructure to support growing communities, I support OPTION A - TO RETAIN THE GREEN BELT.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10857

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sue Thomas

I&O_11355
My option is A to retain green belt land in kelsall I feel strongly that our green belt land needs to be protected for future generations. I moved here to be In the country and it’s disappearing rapidly. We don’t have the infrastructure either new schools doctors or roads They are all full of pot holes and constantly cause problems for the village Well I say village it’s gone past that now unfortunately.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10860

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Kathryn Marray

I&O_11358
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A - Retain the Green Belt land

Comment

Representation ID: 10861

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Sonya Evans

I&O_11359
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate. I am answering Question SS 11 and my choice is: Option A – Retain the Green Belt

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10862

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Powell

I&O_11360
egarding question SS11 I would advise you that I support Option A, retain the Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 10864

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Hoyland

I&O_11362
I wish to make my views known regarding the Spatial Strategy Options (Part 5 of the Local Plan) and in particular question SS11.  Question SS11. I choose option A (Retain the Green Belt)

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10865

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Nicola Dolbear

I&O_11363


Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10866

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Amy Beaumont

I&O_11364
I am answering question SS 11 :- Answer - Option A (Retain the green belt)

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10875

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mark Wrigley

I&O_11373
my response is option A - Retain the green belt.

Option A - Retain the Green Belt